Profile of Crecer13

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2

General Information


Thread: Tank stories16 Dec 2019, 19:31 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Dec 2019, 18:48 PMTiger Baron Ahhh yes, modern Soviet propaganda. I love nothing more than to read how the Tiger wasn't scary as it was painted, even tho there are caught recordings of Soviet tankers saying how really scared they were when they saw a Tiger. I also love reading how the T-34 inspired the Tiger and Panther when in reality those designs had been in the works since the 30s. Unlike you, a person works with archives both foreign and domestic and confirms his words with photographs of documents. And does not bring complete nonsense, we already know about your position “Blessed Murica” and “Damned Commie”, it is not worth repeating it here again, so in the future I will ignore your comments. In addition, The Chieftain himself asks Yuri for information about tanks, and I have often heard him referring to Yuri in his stories. In: The Library
Thread: Shock troop separate timer for grenades? 16 Dec 2019, 12:05 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Dec 2019, 11:47 AMKhan As Farlion mentioned earlier, Obers/Falls can't run through their smoke grenade without getting a movement and health penalty. Shock Troops specialized squad for assault. Without any improvements like a flamethrower. So they must have a separate grenade - this is their direct role. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Guards underperform13 Dec 2019, 17:18 PM Guard and why is it needed when there are Penals with PTRS? And even if remove the PTRS from Penals, the whining that the Guard + Penals is an OP will return again. Soviet infantry is just a mess. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tank stories12 Dec 2019, 19:08 PM https://warspot.ru/users/12363-yuriy-pasholok/published Yuri Pasholok, a tank historian and Wargaming consultant about tanks, has articles on tank stories in English. In: The Library
Thread: Maxim Sustained Fire11 Dec 2019, 13:48 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Dec 2019, 13:41 PMthedarkarmadillo I think I'd rather make it function and balance its price and build time based on that performance (taking into account the large crew) than try and make it fit into the price point and siny not function properly as a result And I think that the cost directly affects the timing in the game. Make Maxim "balanced" and for example a 300mp machine gun. I will never build it: because for a lower price other fractions will have a machine gun with similar characteristics or even better, and some also have a machine gun in T0. Build T2 + hypotical 300mp? No thanks, I'm going to T1. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Maxim Sustained Fire11 Dec 2019, 13:36 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Dec 2019, 13:22 PMT.R. Stormjäger There are ways around that. What if you increased Maxim cost to 280, doubled its build time and narrowed its cone of fire a bit? That way spamming them would be very difficult, especially at the start, and you could then improve the Maxim as a machine gun to do its job. Maybe then it’s easier to remove Maxim? This is a rather ridiculous proposal, Make the unit more expensive and reduce the characteristics. No, Maxim should cost as much as machine guns of other factions and have similar performance for the same price. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: State of the Soviets9 Dec 2019, 10:59 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Dec 2019, 10:50 AMblvckdream Dear Santa Claus, for ~~christmas~~ next patch, I wish for "Insert any fraction" Cheeseborne nerfs. I have been a good boy all year and only sometimes been naughty. Thank you. blvckdream In: COH2 Balance
Thread: smoke canisters7 Dec 2019, 20:26 PM But the Soviet tanks are definitely not enough smoke. T-34-76 must receive a smoke shell and T-34-85 receive smoke bombs that are already in the model; they work like Churchill smoke only without slowing down the speed. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: State of the Soviets7 Dec 2019, 11:29 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Dec 2019, 11:21 AMVipper I suggest you read my post again more carefully this time, I have not suggest that IS-2 should be returned to what it was, I simply point out that IS-2 no longer has the "identity" of a "unbreakable shield with meh firepower". It can dish out damage just fine and even got vet 1 ability to dish out more damage. Here I just agree with you, "unbreakable shield with meh firepower" concept is not needed. No damage - no veterans - no sense. And finally, the IS-2 lost this concept. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: State of the Soviets7 Dec 2019, 11:16 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Dec 2019, 11:07 AMVipper The IS-2 lost the identity of "unbreakable shield with meh firepower" with the latest changes to its gun. It no longer has "meh firepower". Because of this, this tank was - complete shit, no one needs an expensive tank in which the AA DShK does more damage than the main gun. Return to "unbreakable shield with meh firepower" conception - This is an absolutely stupid idea. In: COH2 Balance