Profile of Crecer13

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2

General Information


Thread: Lead coh 2 designer left Relic18 Nov 2019, 08:49 AM Maybe modern / sci-fi is needed for Homeworld 3? I honestly don’t imagine the Company of Heroes modern, it has an excellent setting for the Second World War, with a huge number of unused fractions, equipment and time periods. Moreover, CoH mechanics are not very compatible with guided missiles, MBTs that replace all tanks, etc. The maximum where I see the Company of Heroes is the mid-60s (Caribbean Crisis of 1962). In the period 1945-1960s, a huge number of cool tanks, armored personnel carriers, artillery, etc. were created. but they are still close to the concept of World War II. And only the first helicopters and MBT began to appear. In: Lobby
Thread: Relic working on Age of Empires 415 Nov 2019, 07:11 AM If Relic is no longer working on AoE4, And is working on an unannounced game that they have been creating since 2018. Maybe an email survey conducted in 2017 about the future Company of Heroes is in progress. In: Other Games
Thread: Guard Rifle QOL Improvement14 Nov 2019, 11:14 AM I think this is ok. But it may be to make them more specialized. To make sure that the Guard could buy - or 2 DP-27, with the 1st ability of the veteran "Suppressing Fire" - something like the Rear Echelon analogue - or 2 Bazooka, namely Bazooka because the USSR has too many PTRS, Penalties with PTRS generally make the Guard senseless. Which has always been synergy with T1. And Antitank 1st veteran’s ability to “shoot at weak points” slows down the speed of the movement or does more damage to tanks. Maybe give AT mines with Bazooka (use the renamed Wehrmacht AT mines) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Not getting loot anymore12 Nov 2019, 13:48 PM I have a question, why do you need to get loot? Receive for the sake of receiving? Because during the introduction of the loot system, all loot has long been received or purchased, and now there is no sense in coins, because there is nothing new that can be bought on them. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Zis Barrage9 Nov 2019, 18:58 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Nov 2019, 18:44 PMachpawel At guns' anti tank performance is really similar. There are no differences in combat situations. Problems occur when one side pays more for something that works the same or when one side gets more for the same price. Imo Soviets often get more than tha pay for. Zis barrage is a good example here. No, they don’t. Anti-tank guns usually have the worst high-explosive projectile, due to the fact that the projectile in them flies at a higher speed. So the walls of the projectile have more thickness to withstand the pressure of the powder gases and less explosives. Plus anti-tank guns have a lower elevation angle of the gun. QF 6 pounder: + 15°, PaK-40: + 22°, ZiS-3: + 37° In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: WW2 Daily Pic4 Nov 2019, 19:42 PM A woman treats a soldier with milk, pay attention to a soldier with seven stripes for the wound. In: The Library
Thread: Zis Barrage1 Nov 2019, 14:28 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Nov 2019, 11:25 AMKatitof ZiS-3 is a field gun, not dedicated anti tank gun. Its as much light artillery as it is anti tank gun and it was used extensively in both its roles, its not relics fantasy, its probably most historical portrayal of usage of unit we have in CoH2. 45mm and 57mm were soviet dedicated ATGs in WW2. Even anti-tank guns had excellent anti-infantry capabilities, because they had buckshot. Here is one interesting historical case: On April 29, 1945, the 320th Guards Anti-Tank Regiment found itself on the path of the German units breaking through the Halbe encirclement. The ensuing battle was reminiscent of the battles of the Napoleonic times: the Germans had practically no armored vehicles and attacked the firing positions of the guns with large masses of infantry. As noted in the connection report: "The masses of the corpses of the enemy lay around firing positions, and the enemy continued to harass" During the battle, about 420 German soldiers were killed, 250 soldiers were taken prisoner, 2 armored personnel carriers were destroyed. Soviet losses 9 killed and 22 wounded. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: How to make airborne guards better?31 Oct 2019, 07:10 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Oct 2019, 20:40 PMMaret Soviets never used bazookas, while get some amount in 1941. They have much more piats than bazookas, but not used them too. IMHO, airborne should have booby trap ability in both variants - they diversion specialists, it's they work. While with ppsh will get tactic advantage instead suppresive fire. They don't have stealth like other diversion troops and you can't make combo - stealth + tactic advantage. No, they were used. Documents were found: a summary of the 272th OMSBON, they mention "reactive rifle" and award sheets for platoon of "reactive rifle" that used Bazook. This unit used the Ford GPA, which included the Bazookas. In April 1944, 11 such OMSBONs were created. So this is true as in the photograph: cars of amibia and Bazooka. Plus, during the excavation of the Zeelow Heights, a Bazooka was found, which belonged to the Soviet troops. So we can conclude: Bazooka was used in the USSR, not very intensively, for objective reasons - one of them is the extreme unreliability of batteries. But still used. In: Lobby
Thread: How to make airborne guards better?30 Oct 2019, 20:12 PM At the stage of discussing the creation of this unit, I said that such ability is stupid and does not meet their "role" to soldiers operating behind enemy lines. In: Lobby
Thread: Dismiss button30 Oct 2019, 20:10 PM This ability was in the campaign and I lacked such mechanics in multiplayer. In: COH2 Gameplay