Profile of Crecer13

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2

General Information


Thread: State of the T34-858 Jan 2020, 20:08 PM Another important disadvantage T-34-85. There is no commander with the T-34-85 and Shock Troops. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Some buff for all factions commander weapon package 8 Jan 2020, 16:03 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Jan 2020, 15:47 PMVipper Yet conscripts where used allot in the latest torment and where Soviets one of the most successful faction. Neither Conscirpt nor Soviets need another buff. Lmg use a specific profile with a negative curve making it inferior at close range and can not be fired on the move by mainline infatry. BAR is not a LMG in this game. The fact that it can be dropped is rather irrelevant. Yeah, great solution. Ignore the obvious thing that the Soviet infantry is poorly designed. We do not have PPSh-41 to fight against the LMG infantry because "I decided so." We have an eternal pull between Conscripts and Penals. We have the eclipse of the Guard because the Penals have are PTRS. What the Soviets really need is a big and radical restructuring of the infantry, because it does not work correctly. if the BAR not a machine gun, should it not drop? Or should the SMG and AR drop, because if the BAR is just an automatic rifle, its name is deciphered. Rifles must not drop. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Some buff for all factions commander weapon package 8 Jan 2020, 15:24 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Jan 2020, 15:06 PMVipper There is nothing wrong with my eyes, when it comes to mainline infatry: Grenadier have access stock Lmg but they have their limitation IS have access to stock LMg but they have their limitation the other faction do not have access to lmg in their mainline infatry and they should not have. And the Soviet faction hardly needs any buffs. And also they should not have PPSh-41 as a weapon without a doctrine for countering infantry with a machine gun, all that they are supposed to do is only useless molotov. And the BAR as if it were not listed in the game files is still a machine gun. If it were a light weapon like an Assault Rifle, then it should not be dropped. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Some buff for all factions commander weapon package 8 Jan 2020, 13:17 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Jan 2020, 13:10 PMVipper BAR in game is not LMG. It has good DPS mid and can be fired on the move. And no Conscripts should not have access to LMG because then you would LMG blobs fighting LMG blobs and no reason for engaging in a better range. Then open your eyes - this is already in the game, the rest of the factions have a machine gun for the starting infantry and only conscripts suck because we do not want to "insert any ridiculous excuse." They don’t even have a non-doctrinal PPSh-41 to at least somehow justify this distance. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: State of the T34-858 Jan 2020, 11:57 AM I don’t use, I prefer specialized units SU-85 + Katyusha. T-34-85 universal mediocrity in the game. For the price similar to Pz-4, his anti-infantry ability is clearly worse, the anti-tank’s ability is also not great. Stupid 1st vet. And the more so the T-34-85 is absolutely poor against the background of the M4C - which has a similar price, similar characteristics to the main gun, but has an AA machine gun, the better 1st vet, smoke, and a change of shells. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Some buff for all factions commander weapon package 8 Jan 2020, 11:17 AM Conscripts should receive DP-27 without any specialization. A machine gun is the basis of any infantry platoon. And all the base infantry has access to a machine gun. Grenadiers - MG-42, IS - Bren, Riflemans - BAR, Volksgrenadiers - machine gun substitute STG-44. And only Conscripts without a basic weapon upgrade, because a unique 7-person, we see such a role. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Sega exec join Tencent & China Expansion21 Dec 2019, 20:24 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Dec 2019, 20:17 PMKatitof It already did. One of the football players spoke out against CCP and chinese had him removed from latest Fifa, because EA will suck any kind of cock to get even a single penny more if it could. Same for activision blizzard, but I suppose that story is known enough to not repeat it again here. Gaming goes political, because most big companies grew too big and too greedy, willing to do anything it takes and betray whatever values they need to just to get some chinese money. I can imagine the situation if Activision made the Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 with the same campaign, instead of Russia, China would be. They didn’t get a single cent in the Chinese market anymore. In: Lobby
Thread: Sega exec join Tencent & China Expansion21 Dec 2019, 06:27 AM 21 century gold rush. In: Lobby
Thread: Guards underperform20 Dec 2019, 15:05 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Dec 2019, 14:53 PMSneakEye FYI: source Buttoning is very realistic. Indeed, an instruction was created for the soldiers where to shoot. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet Lendlease rework20 Dec 2019, 12:51 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Dec 2019, 12:48 PMT.R. Stormjäger Yes it does, if you put it at T3 the call in is pointless. Putting it at T4 means that the call in group allows you to obtain a T4 unit for a 50mp cheaper price, or you can just wait for 50ish fuel and get the squad from T4. Or you can take a similar or better call-in the infantry in 2-3 CP and the Shock Troops will also cost the same as the Assault Guards. T4 is makes no sense. In: COH2 Gameplay