Profile of Crecer13

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2

General Information


Thread: Possibilities for commandos6 Dec 2019, 18:53 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Dec 2019, 18:47 PMT.R. Stormjäger https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commandos_(United_Kingdom) Look at their list of equipment. I don’t think they should get AT packages or M1 carbines. I’d rather see them use weapons that they used in real life. I think the Commandos could use the M1 Carbine, because they are based on the Airborne Forces, and the British Paratroopers used the M1 Carbine: In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: State of the Soviets6 Dec 2019, 17:11 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Dec 2019, 16:45 PMVipper That is like saying that M-42/Dhsk/120/Guards are not needed because similar units are available stock. There is plenty of room for many units. Here are just the listed units almost out of the game. I don’t know how it is in 1 versus 1 but in 3 after 3 and above - I do not see these units. - Even when the M-42 had a really good buckshot shell, it was limited in team games because the ZiS-3 does a better job. And now with the destroyed ability M-42 again offside. - DShK is not a frequent guest in the game, although not a bad unit. But at the same time, no better than Maxim - Maxim has a wider arc. The DShK has better suppression but a very small arc and a slow turning speed. - 120 - almost unused, and therefore there has recently been a topic about it. - Guard - unnecessary. Penaltis with PTRS completely block this unit. I see this unit once on few dozen battles, apparently due to personal preferences. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: State of the Soviets6 Dec 2019, 15:48 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Dec 2019, 15:44 PMT.R. Stormjäger Why though? 7man cons with less rof bonus, 360mp Penals with flamethrower upgrade. Could work. to a 7-person whine, do you want to add Penals with a flamethrower whine? There will be talk of God, it’s 6 people with self-loading rifles and a flamethrower. Maybe would make them Mosin and a flamethrower? Then these are steroid engineers, or maybe then we’ll give them PPSh? Then why would the Shock Troops be needed? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: State of the Soviets6 Dec 2019, 15:38 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Dec 2019, 15:21 PMT.R. Stormjäger Well my point is a design where cons are the defensive unit and penals are a niche offensive unit could work. It would have to come alongside a T1 redesign. And this will remain which unit is currently more competitive than other units. There should be one starting infantry unit, and T1 and T2 should give the game styles: T1 - aggressive, T2 - defensive In: COH2 Balance
Thread: State of the Soviets6 Dec 2019, 15:00 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Dec 2019, 14:54 PMT.R. Stormjäger Grenadiers and panzergrenadiers work though. I think more expensive penals with flamethrowers would work well with conscripts. Obviously this would require an extensive rework of penals and T1 to work side by side with cons build instead of replacing it. They are not starting. They are consistent, you do not lose other units choosing between the Grenadiers and PanzerGrenadiers. At the Soviets, you adjust your gameplay to the unit that is better at the moment and choose between T2 and T1. Grenadiers and Panzergrenadiers complement each other: Grenadiers main unit and ranged, Panzer Grenadiers melee-medium battles and AT support. In the Soviets, this is divided into commanders: the shock troops - CQC. Guard - AT support. In any case, either the Penalties or the Guard are superfluous. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: State of the Soviets6 Dec 2019, 14:53 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Dec 2019, 14:41 PMT.R. Stormjäger Soviets are not the problem, IS2 is the issue. If people want the 7man upgrade scaled back, Penals need to be changed to coexist with conscripts. It means: There must be only one: no matter what roles you come up with for the two starting infantry units, one unit will always be preferable and unit will overlap the role of the other unit, and tug of war will continue. Two starting units are a very bad design. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: STARSHIP TROOPERS TERRAN COMMAND4 Dec 2019, 20:21 PM The animation looks rather mediocre, but the trailer caused a bit of nostalgia. In: Other Games
Thread: State of the Soviets4 Dec 2019, 19:16 PM And again, a tug of war between Conscripts and Penalties, who would have expected such a problem between two starting infantry units? It’s long time ago to get rid of one unit, but this will never happen - because there are no balls to take such a step. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How to make airborne guards better?4 Dec 2019, 13:18 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Dec 2019, 13:12 PMKatitof You're aware that partisans already exist? Plus, falls were deployed for years the same way AGs are now. Its just nomenclature. I Know, that we have an absolutely senseless unit, which was originally conceived as "parachuting" (and, moreover, without explosives, although other dropping units like Paratroopers and Commandos have explosives) - and now it's just a Guard appearing from building. And since a unit cannot work as it was originally conceived - this unit should be reworked. In: Lobby
Thread: How to make airborne guards better?4 Dec 2019, 13:02 PM If the paratroopers cannot be parachuted, then they should be converted into an ambush unit: rework to four people and maybe five people, give camouflage, give the ability to sabotage: destroy a point - the point does not give resources until the engineer will not fix it, or a trap on a point - a unit that will return it back will be blown up, or another ability for active sabotage. Rework weapons upgrade to an ambush style. In: Lobby