Profile of jagd wölfe

This is exactly why nobody on this forum takes you seriously. All you do is scream bias. You do not disprove anyone, you do not provide any good counter arguments. And you call anyone who opposes anything that isnt in axis favor biased.

Literally feminist behavior.

Ohh the irony...

Like i said, I could have disproved you easily, starting from pathetic ostwind and 20mm penetration, that have ridicolous 31 % chances of penetration .
I didn't simply because you don't deserve.
Somebody that post such a poor video as argument doesn't deserve an answer.
You have posted a video of 3 222 (equal to 90 fuel) shooting to a jackson at the closest range possible, like if it was a normal situation that can occurr in actual game, ignoring that jackson can effectively fire on the move as it retreated back to...anything (simple rifles fire kills it).
Then the next video is a jagdp4, titled "it can't take damage unless rear hit", ignoring that 222 in such a situation could easily stick behind the unturretted slow TD, colliding models to stop it and ACTUALLY WIN the engagement with some micro and rear hits (but again that's a retarded situation that will never occurr in actual game, that's why your stupid example was flawed to begin with).

I don't know what is your problem against feminism, and why are you associating me to extremism and such...but is normal for...human beings to not try to use logic to convince someone who talks like a mad man, even more provide cou ter arguments to the most nonsense crap (i won't call those arguments) those 2 videos are.

Oh, the irony.

So, from what I gathered from this thread, the Jackson is supposed to be a counter to heavies as bazookas and AT gun cover mediums. However, I've played a lot with USF lately and to me it seems that the pen (much lower than 100%) and accuracy of the Jacksons just don't cut it against heavies:

KT: 69%/64%/59% | with HVAP: 80%/75%/66%
Panther: 81%/75%/68% | with HVAP: 94%/88%/78%
Tiger: 87%/80%/73% | with HVAP: 100%/93%/83%

So, the only time where the Jackson can, as you say, 100% pen a heavy/largely armored medium is with HVAPs at near range, where paks/raketens/fausts/mines can significantly hinder your ability to push. Not to mention the "high accuracy" that I just don't see in my matches, you'll have to bring numbers in the discussion if you really want to convince me and others of this. I honestly think SU85s and FFs to be better at their roles with higher rate of fire and self-spotting for the former and sick damage bursts, high accuracy and disable for the latter.

About the topic of the discussion, in my opinion the weaknesses of the Jackson are its low armor, need for a spotter to fully utilize its range, need of munis and vet for HVAP to reliably pen heavies, low burst damage compared to the FF. And inability to even touch infantry, but that's a given with allied TDs.

So you are telling me that jackson "don't cut it against heavies"
So i guess that Panther, which has the same exact penetration "don't cut it against heavies", and pak that has lower penetration "don't cut it against heavies".
Also tiger "don't cut it against heavies"...hell nothing "cut it against heavies".
Considering that both allies and axis have 375 armor vehicles and that apparently only hvap jackson can manage to get a decent penetration, well that's a big plus isn't it ?

You had all stats there and decided to post those and provide an argument butchered by the simple fact that you bitch about a level of penetration that axis can't even reach without doctrines.
I'm not surprised tho, you couldn't distinguish clear hyperbole..so i wasn't exactly betting my money on you being a genius.

0.75 moving accuracy ? higher base accuracy than both panther and stug ?
It's the 0.04/0.064 accuracy model (FF, Jackson, su85), the best in game and a wet dream for 90% of axis vehicles.

I won't even dive into ridicolous trash claims..if you think those base pen values aren't reliable you are either high/drunk or highly biased.

That might help but will not solve the issues of Ostheer T4.

In addition the Panther will still not be able to kite enemy tanks due to range, will not be able to chase or flank due to price and rear armor.

It will have to fire and retreat repair.

That's why nerfing armor/range and boosting hp pool and moving/stationary accuracy would succesfully revitalize tier 4 and okw panther.

I tested that in cheat mode. JP4 beats M36 because of better ROF.

If it only had a turret and much superior mobility to benefit for flanking and an ability that boost dramatically its raw dps output, as well as a top food chain penetration that makes it a counter against the heaviest armor and an high moving accuracy that allows it to move and force jadgpanzer 4 to move and lose a lot of accuracy.

And puma is beaten in a frontal 1 vs 1 against any su, it's not like it has a speed and turret traverse to benefit from.

Isu/ele/jagd is too OP, because it frontally kills anything, it's not like it's a sitting duck and can be flanked.

I'm liking this one, let's oversimplify more stuff and look at it at a ridicolous lab made 1vs1 test.

Truth is that jackson is the ultimate YOLO tank now. It has:
1) Full 640hp
2) High moving accuracy
3) High dps
4) Turret and huge mobility
5) 100% pen penetration against anything
6) High base accuracy.

It had low hp, and was a kiter tank with good mobility and alpha strike as well as good pen, thus it had some drawback.

For urban maps it couldn't work that well ? Usf had to use m10, easy 8 or pershing ?
Too bad...it's not like Wehrmacht has been using for ages Tigers and Elephant to survive late game since Panther is (IS) a piece of trash, steaming pile of shit.

It's also funny to notice how much double standards made up the ridicolous patch

-(Community [?]) Jackson is weak in a specific map dependant scenario in which kiters fail to perform as intended
-(Mod team) Hell let's overbuff it and remove any of its weaknesses and drawbacks.

-(Community) Panther sucks badly at any role ever
-(Mod team) Meh it must be teching, let's give it a ridicolous smokescreen 0.6 sec reload buff, while we nerf to oblivion its veterancy and armor.
Let's also DELAY STUG and TIER 3 and smokescreen it as a tier 4 buff.

I can't have an opinion on a non existant unit, because a unit with no role at all may aswell not exist.

1) Long range fighter: It sucks in long range stationary tank sniping, it has a terribly low dps compared to FF, Jackson, jadgpanzer 4...

2) Cqb hunter tank: it won't benefit from it's armor at that range most of the time, the dps is still ridicolously low and moving to actually hunt enemies makes it even worse.

Piece of trash need some moving accuracy AND accuracy buff.