Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
Stug is counter to medium tanks, (the same same SU-76 is) and has one of the lowest penetration of stock Tds.
[actually it is currently over-performing but is one of the few thing that keep ostheer afloat, since Panther is under-performing and T4 in general]
Posts: 450
Not really. If there is a need for it one can increase the TS of Brumbar (first decreasing the accuracy of heavy TDs).
Generally Brumbar is a unit with lots of issues, currently it also completely shutdown by heavy TDs and its role becomes purely defensive.
I would rather see it come out earlier and hold less a punch. Or get its real role of an assault gun.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
So you actually find great excuses for the Stug but not for the Jackson.
Posts: 4474
cause at gun can out range them (as they should)
If it not gonna change much, what do you want to change it?
Then why again Ostheer has Stug? After all they have pak40 and shreck.
Katitof-2018
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
One of the reason the jakson got buffed was to deal with brumbar, elephant strats. Brits and soviets do fine vs them, but usf could not do much last patch. Usf is still worse than soviets this patch.
Also, Brumbars don't have huge issues and are really good. They have high hp and armor, so i do not see your point. All of the good players are still using them.
Posts: 450
Again increasing the the target of the brumbar would leave the balance as is.
Exactly what mode are we taking about where ostheer can have both an Elephant and brumbars?
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
You are a 2v2 player, so you know any mode that is not 1v1. If it it 1v1, why do usf players always pick shermans?
Posts: 935
Because Shermans are more cost efficient than PzIV.
Posts: 450
Actually I have played all modes, but yea I play allot of 2v2s.
Because Shermans are more cost efficient than PzIV.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
If you would play USF you'd know that most Cost efficient is Double Scott.
People use shermans them to pick off lone or capping squads...
Posts: 450
You assumption that I do not play USF is simply wrong, you reply should be addressed at Mr.Flush, who asked "why do usf players always pick shermans?"
All that is great but do not change the fact that M36 should not completely shut down the PzIV.
Posts: 232
Panthers completely shut down shermans. Not saying the panther is crazy viable, but p4 not being able to fight a jakson is nothing new.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Panthers completely shut down shermans. Not saying the panther is crazy viable, but p4 not being able to fight a jakson is nothing new.
Posts: 450
This thread is about making Jackson have a weaknes and not a no brainer to build every game.
Having a way for the p4 to dominate the Jackson would give the unit a much needed weakness.
. 
Posts: 2243
Posts: 42
This thread is about making Jackson have a weaknes and not a no brainer to build every game.
Having a way for the p4 to dominate the Jackson would give the unit a much needed weakness.
Posts: 42
once more: all other tds have a weakness...which weakness has the jackson?
Posts: 2243
Havent seen a Jackson every get an infantry squad wipe hbu? Also they cost a shit ton of fuel and manpower?
Posts: 158 | Subs: 2
it cost 5fuel more than a jagdpz4..which is shit since patch
Posts: 450
 |
|
|
34 | ||
|
|
|
|
26 | ||
 |
|
|
23 | ||
|
|
|
|
21 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
105 | ||
 |
|
|
30 | ||
|
|
|
|
18 | ||
|
|
|
|
7 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
