Profile of jagd wölfe

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1660

General Information


Thread: Ask the Strategist!20 Jan 2018, 23:25 PM Hey...it's me again 1) The new usf mechanized doctrine: best faction to use against ? What teching to complement it ? Captain or LT ? 2) New fallschirmjaeger, when and how to use those over obersoldaten ? Are they worth if i alreafy teched to tier 4 ? In: Strategy Desk
Thread: Ask the Strategist!19 Jan 2018, 23:02 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Jan 2018, 22:56 PMJae For Jett Mech HQ works, but battlegroup is almost always preferable. Consider going mech hq when youre against usf, especially if they go lieutenant, but otherwise battlegroup into t4 is probably better. If you do go mech, then you should look to backtech as soon as possible, the ideal time being when you have enough floating manpower (around 500 since you need 100 for the truck, 200 for the tier itself, and 100 for the medics; youll want extra manpower after that for reinforcement). That is to say, get healing up before you go schewerer or else your either unnecessarily bleeding a lot of manpower or muni. As for your second question, either works. Honestly, going tier 2 for maxims is probably preferable. Maxims allow you to cost effectively deal with infantry while your cons (and possibly your zis) take care of the light vehicles and tanks. Thanks In: Strategy Desk
Thread: Ask the Strategist!19 Jan 2018, 22:43 PM Hey guys, 1) Current OKW meta regarding teching ? Is mech hq still viable (when ?) ? When shoild i rather go btg to tier 4 ? And when i go mech should i backtech for isg/healing ? Before or after schewer ? 2) Soviet tank hunter doctrine: good tank hunter build order ? I'm not sure if it is better to go double cons and tier 1 penals/sniper and then upgrade ptrs on cons or simply stick to conscripts. Thanks. In: Strategy Desk
Thread: 1-2 sec lag after the last server maintenance19 Jan 2018, 17:36 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Jan 2018, 17:30 PMAndy_RE UPDATE Hey guys, So, our web team deployed a new battle server yesterday which has the potential to resolve the issue. Apparently, players who have reconnected to COH2 in the last 10 hours or so, should be connecting via this new server. We will be monitoring the situation today, but If you have experienced a recent improvement since logging back on, let us know here. Thanks all, Andy Thanks for your support guys In: Lobby
Thread: Opinion on Ostheer Panther in new patch (1v1)18 Jan 2018, 13:45 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Jan 2018, 12:55 PMKharn I think for simplicities sake we should just have the Panther mirror the other late game TD's, slow turret, slow reload/RoF, high accuracy, high pen. The added benefit the panther has over these other TD's for its increased cost is generally having a butt-ton more armor than the rest of them, and the ability to blitz which increased RoF. They shouldn't touch a panthers AI. Perhaps if it takes on a sole TD role the price can be adjusted a bit. But I'd be very careful. The panther used to dominate in the tank game, but those days are definitely behind us. No point in that, axis have turretless TD for suck roles. I agree that panther should get the 200, high pen, low rof damage model, but it shouldn't become another tank sniper that would most probably make stug and jagdpanzer redundant. The most reasonable change would be designing such 200 damage TD in a way it complement those TD. Reduced armor (270-290) and range to Heavy tank (45) for more accuracy and on the move accuracy (0.75) would make it similar to an armored m10 expensive and with better durability and damage. That's the only way to make panther balanced. Any rework that will make panther perform in the intended long range TD work will either make TD redundant as Panther will be just better or panther too bad to be used In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Opinion on Ostheer Panther in new patch (1v1)18 Jan 2018, 10:08 AM I still don't know why they haven't yet implemented a 200 damage/rof model and buffed his base accuracy and moving accuracy. 1) 200 damage means that the panther will still need 4 shots to kill TD and mediums, but be better in its intended anti premium/heavy role 2) 200 damage models means a slower reload, so Panther can be accurate and reliable both stationary and on the move without obliterating mediums.. Cut the frontal armor to 280 (and add back 10% armor that would restore previous armor at vet 2) and generalists/premiums will be even more effective when closing in (AND add the new damage model lowering the general medium/TD TTK). But WHATEVER.... Jump back to quoted post17 Jan 2018, 16:40 PMDangerous-Cloth Then it still most likely won't work due to high cost and the tier it is in. Tier IV is almost a liability in 1v1 when rushed. It is literally a tier for when oppertunity arises, which it quite often does not. Now less than before tho, after that teching rework. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Opinion on Ostheer Panther in new patch (1v1)17 Jan 2018, 13:38 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Jan 2018, 13:11 PMDangerous-Cloth It's ai potency is neglicable when considering it faces 5 to 6 men squads imo. Considering other heavy tanks with more ai killing power face 4 men to 5 men squads and only 4 men squads when facing Ostheer, the Panther is really lackluster, espeically the Ostheer one. It's not just this.. 1) All mg's need to face a target, which is rather improbable most of the time since you will be constantly on target vehicle only 2) Unlike aoe based weapons mg's are directly affected by scatter drastically and highly dependant on the range far more than main guns he shells, and you don't want your panther to get a snare... 3) The panther "generalist" requires a 60 muni upgrade to have the supposed "generalist" performance..but it's not like firefly is reliant on tulips to do it's at job 4) the dps coming from mg's is, like i already said, directly affected from accuracy far more drastically than main gun's. Lategame maps are full of covers and craters that reduce incoming accuracy of infantry...this doesn't affect..let's say...Comet dps that much, but the Panther generalist...well... But obviously "panther generalist and panther no micro" meme from balance team served its purpose and now even okw panther is trash. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Give Assault Grenadiers Faust16 Jan 2018, 19:30 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Jan 2018, 18:07 PMFelixTHM Amazing. 55% of current voters think Ass Grens are fine right now. It never ceases to amaze me how incredibly biased and unreasonable people in the COH2 community can be. Or maybe it's because they don't realise Ass Grens are horrible because they've never seen anyone use them? Pretty much this. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Coh2 USF rifle company and E816 Jan 2018, 19:27 PM Infantry/Airborne(or recon)/rifle In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Give Assault Grenadiers Faust16 Jan 2018, 17:04 PM Why ? For a faction as OST a 6 men squad sprinting with snare would simply be OP. The reason it isn't used is that 1) it has no late game AI scaling 2) the doctrine hardly synergize with the faction. The ass grens would imply that you will skip tier 2 in favour of tier 1, use grens with faust as long range fighter and use ass grens for cqb, as in any case panzergrens are just better for utility and performances and if you build tier 2 you'd better stick to them. But is impossible to skip tier 2 as stug comes too late for you to not get swarmed by enemy lights without pak.. That's why the ht with panzergrens could be replaced with a puma call in. Getting a puma call in in second slot and buffing ass grens performances/combat veterancy would make the doctrine and ass grens far more viable. In: COH2 Balance