Profile of jagd wölfe

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1660

General Information


Thread: fixing okw taking form vcoh6 Jan 2018, 16:28 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2018, 20:52 PMZombiFrancis An mp40s upgrade for incendiary nades is just as much a tactical decision. Personally I believe balancing efforts should try to eliminate the need for such crutches as incendiary nades. I still maintain that the lava nade is a kludge of a solution and actually prevents OKW from exploring any other measure for garrisons. I mean USF has never had stock access to flames and they have to sidetech for nades and smoke while having to go up against mg42s. Mind you I've always suggested that Sturms and isgs have access to stock smoke as well. You can't explore changing up volks nades without improved smoke access. At least the isg has it now. And USF has got the new mortar that was DEFINETLY a kludge of a solution... What's the issue with lava nade, it is actually something unique and adds flavour and versatility that okw needs, it's surely not underpriced and now it's even "dodgeable". If okw had something like pineapple + mortar it would be much more powerful as wipe nades and free anti garrisons would be more strong, and would be another mortar faction. Smoke on sturm would be OP AF, at least if stock: starting smoke on a starting unit ? No defense against sturm rush. Isg smoke was a good change, but that freaking thing has to gain some aoe, i need 5 barrages to even drop 2 models on a garrison. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: fixing okw taking form vcoh5 Jan 2018, 18:08 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2018, 17:57 PMVipper Imo instead of another redesign long lasting issue should take priority over most other things. Those issues include: Pop XP values Vet abilities Vet bonuses Commander abilities Commander design built times reinforcement costs and so on... my suggestion about OKW would be something like this: That's too much of a big work there, several changes to be approved by relic, several new meta/matchup options to test... let's limit ourself to - reduce vet 5 co requirements to other factions vet 3 equivalent - find a middle ground between the trashy dbp volks and pre patch volks by toning down pre nerf veterancy bonuses that got previously removed - buff isg - cut jadgpanzer 4/stuka cost - move medics to base ...and any other needed improvement/buff/nerf/nonradical change. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: fixing okw taking form vcoh5 Jan 2018, 17:57 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2018, 17:52 PMHon3ynuts I think the nonlinear teching is fine, but medics should be purchasable from the Hq after you build any truck, rather than only purchasable after the med truck is up. This +1000000 Frp could spawn medics to btg if those are already teched at main hq. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: fixing okw taking form vcoh5 Jan 2018, 17:38 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2018, 17:11 PMStug life this would just bring back the other problems, volks too strong at vet 5,ober never used cause cost too much/volks can do the same work, strums become op at units with their vet and ability to repair, stuka comes too early for 75 fuel (compare it to kat and pazer w. they both come at the last tier) volks mp are bad only cause of the moving accuracy penality they deal good damage idf they stand still , just buff the moving cooldown accuracy to 1 and reduce the normal accuracy accordingly -Volks already were nerfed with flame grenade cooldown, and -5/10% at vet 5 accuracy/cooldown is a lot, especially since we are talking about a squad 3 men bolt action with average damage and high accuracy/cooldown. Just do the math, it's already a significant reduction as it doesn't apply just to stg and is a lategame bonus whoch applies to already boosted numbers (so a -x% reduction is more significant than it looks). It's not like modders did any kind of math when they simply REMOVED vet bonuses, this is why actual volks are pathetic without stg and mediocre with stg way beyond anything that can be justified by a STILL-NOT-CHEAP at all cost. - pls let's end the propaganda of obers never used, obers were always used, always kept alive to high vet and always proficient. We can look at luvnest/hans/etc build orders, you will always find those. If there's one unit that has never ever been UP at all that's obers. The only modes that never saw obers are 3 and 4s, because of the arty spam (AND IT'S NOT LIKE IT CHANGED ANYTHING LUL) - how the hell would sturm be op ?, you are just getting in double handheld at like any other factions at infantry, including panzergrens, that if anything are just better with better RA with vet and AI utility - 85 fuel then, but stuka MUST be mutually exclusive with isg, unless backteching is done, for obvious reasons. -what's the issue with starting hq medic upgrade transfering to btg with frp ? -volks are simply bad, in dbp without stg 250 mp/25 lose to cons 240/20 at max vet 5 to 3... If volks must be so trash they must be cheaper, is that simple..but toning down vet 4/5 like that is already a good solution. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: fixing okw taking form vcoh5 Jan 2018, 17:07 PM Faction is ok as it is, it just need minimal tweaks/changes: - revert volks veterancy changes to pre DBP and tone down vet 4-5 accuracy/cooldown bonuses to 10% instead of 15/20, revert DB0 buff to vet 3 RA. - give isg an aoe buff (to wehr mortar stats) and add 50 mp to the cost - reduce stuka zu fuss cost to 75 fuel, on line with other rocket artillery (because now it can get one shotted and can't one shot team weapons, and still kept ugly situational creeping barrage (it could keep 100 fuel price tag if it had a circular barrage). - give sturms 120 muni double shreck - cut 10-15 fuel from nerfed jadgpanzer4 - (optional) somehow make mp40 volks less of a meme and more of a combat unit. - restore old obersoldaten cost to 400 mp and restore veterancy 3 RA bonus. The only true issue is healing...healing is locked in the first tier, which kinda makes mech build, now less shocky because of luchs nerf, crippled. I think starting hq could upgrade medics, and the red cross in BTG could be replaced by an okw cross (okw), with a frp upgrade that transfer medics when active. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Penal Battalions Balanced patch from Relic *Sarcasm5 Jan 2018, 11:15 AM DUDE, just saying, penals used to be OP, they aren't..and your cover play was a bit flawed. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: okw grenade unlock3 Jan 2018, 09:43 AM yep In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: [USF] Thompson paratroopers3 Jan 2018, 09:42 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Jan 2018, 08:37 AMtightrope Yeah paras get the elite bazookas from weapon racks. I think it is fine having 2 upgrades available in each commander. As for airborne being useless have you tried the revised p47 rocket strike? It is very strong and obers have received a few nerfs since the old days when airborne was popular making lmg paras stand out much more. Like i said, airborne has 3 upgrades, and normal para can get 2 super zooks. I don't oubt it, but overall recon is just better, and 2 slots within airborne are still wasted on bad abilities, while the others are good but not enough to make the doctrine that good. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: [USF] Thompson paratroopers3 Jan 2018, 01:08 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Jan 2018, 00:51 AMsherlock I see where you're coming from. I can't think of a good reason to not have them as an upgrade other than making them different from normal paras, which in itself could be enough of a reason. It would achieve nothing at all unfortunately, we all know airborne quickly fell off the meta and is the next usf doctrine to need a rework anyway to be of any use. (As a player that used a lot airborne, the only thing that will make those viable is a replacement for team weapons paradrop). Like i said, para with thompson would perfectly fit a doctrine providing a sniper rifle combat squad. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: New Wehrmacht Jäger Infantry2 Jan 2018, 23:00 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Jan 2018, 22:39 PMStorm Elite It is literally zero. It does not land hits. At all. The MG misses, the main gun misses. And it gets blown up by rifle fire. In Tier 2. But no, you'd rather argue semantics and try to deflect while winning without any skill whatsoever with the inherently superior Allied units that require no cover use, no line of sight use, no flanking, nothing, purely by having superior stats. The pathetic Allied bias on this forum is sickening. +1 Arguing about semantics won't change the fact that 222 is ridicolously UP, it should get some decent dps. I don't know if such strawman over it is to avoid the real point. In: COH2 Gameplay