Profile of jagd wölfe

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1660

General Information


Thread: OKW is absolutely trash now, rebalance this asap!28 Dec 2017, 21:42 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Dec 2017, 20:26 PMthepwnasorour - Accuracy increased from 0.06/0.05/0.04 to 0.06/0.0516665/0.043333 (to match other AT guns)<---- how am i spreading lies? but I do get your point. I just don't want the rak to have an even better AT capabilities to a faction that has ample ways to deal with tanks (ever tier there is an AT option). If the Rak where to be buffed which i wouldnt be opposed to. I would like it to be placed behind some sort of teching like every other ATG. Both playing against a rak and using the rak is unsatisfying. That's the unofficial balance mod...the change never made it in DBP... raketen has actually an inferior accuracy compared to any at gun in game. Okw has nothing more at wise compared to other factions... 2 TD, a snare, an atg and a light vehicle... Soviets have 2 TD, 2 snares, an atg and a light vehicle, viable handheld at. Usf have 1 TD, 1 snare, an immobilize at mine, an atg (a very good one), a light vehicle and viable handheld at Ukf have 1 TD (the best tank destroyer in game), a premium, an atg (a very good one), a viable handheld at and the best at light vehicle in game... Nothing of what you said is correct honestly...and we are talking about facts... Ps: sturm shreck is not a viable at in the slightest way... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW is absolutely trash now, rebalance this asap!28 Dec 2017, 21:16 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Dec 2017, 20:30 PMthepwnasorour So we are just ignoring the other things that it has that other ATGS don't? I mean if being able to cloak and retreat or have a rotatable turret didn't matter.... Also nothing but pak 43s or JT can shoot thru shoot blockers hence the name "shot blockers" Because having extended vision AND range to 70, sprint, TWP, he barrage is not useful at all. Too much bs here ... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW is absolutely trash now, rebalance this asap!28 Dec 2017, 20:05 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Dec 2017, 18:46 PMthepwnasorour You know that the rackten doesn't hit any ground obstacles right? (goes right through) and they both have (bear with me here) THE EXACT SAME ACC. Jump back to quoted post28 Dec 2017, 19:23 PMA table Probably because said M3, UC or M20 are moving. As we all know, moving targets are a bit harder to hit. It's not like OKW has a snare to slow those vehicles down or anything. That's wrong, stop spreading lies, you and Table. https://www.coh2.org/topic/62083/unofficial-revamp-mod-efa-wfa-brits Raketenwerfer - Can no longer be suppressed - Moves at full speed if detected while cloak ability is active (QoL) - Accuracy increased from 0.06/0.05/0.04 to 0.06/0.0516665/0.043333 (to match other AT guns) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW is absolutely trash now, rebalance this asap!28 Dec 2017, 19:46 PM It's a symptom of balance patch illness. There's no clue of synergy and faction design. Cons were neber intended to stand their ground but were meant to be cannon fodder supported by a good maxim/tier 2 (that have got a buff indeed)--->blind overbuff that will make cons new penals Usf were meant to have a strong mainline at start with upgrade that made rm powerful until elites arrival in late game, which would have been countered by armor (and soft countered by infantry itself) definetly much more powerful in AI compared to axis counterparts for such purpose. Double bar spam is the king now...no reason to ever get m8 motor or another ai vehicle. Ostheer tier 4 was meant to be the ostheer aggressive phase...siege guns..rocket artillery..and ? An offensive TD ? The okw pantger model perfectly worked...with live price pintle mg (useless, the only purpose has been justifing nerfs claiming it made panther a reliable ai source) could even have been removed for old okw moving accuracy... That would have actually given axis an offensive TD...a reason to stop spamming stugs and heavy TD for ostheer. Okw has been designed over a cheap mainline supported by highly powerful cqb squads up to light vehicles..they have balanced volls over that but they kept pricing...thus a lot of people fund those UP and will probably start a pfus meta. The ballance team decided to slap stg and keep those in DBP regardless of faction design.. Typical "experiment over fixing issues" approach completely ignoring this may be aswell last patch. Easy and reasonable solution would have been giving back shreck to volks after first tier...but any upgrade eould have been priced 90 mp and 120 muni..squad would lose 1 men and get RA bonus to make volks vet 5 RA similar to vet 3 RA of panzergrens, and get 2 shrecks..a complete copypaste with volks skin of panzergrens with same exact final cost, including reinforce cost (and don't bullshit, it can be done like frp changed reinforce cost to all units). Sturm would take on a combat cqb role and complement with mid to long obersoldaten... No stg powercreep, no lack of early at because shitwerfer, no shreckblob abuse like relase...take what works and put it on work.. But hey better make up new stuff and keep old things that never ever worked properly since the last moment...we do have a lot of time to test and tweak such changes. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Switching axis secondary weapons of support squads28 Dec 2017, 19:24 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Dec 2017, 16:04 PMZombiFrancis There was a game where you would use volks to cover an mg position from enemy flanks. Enemy grenades could punish this tactic, but upgrading volks with mp40s could punish any rushing flank attempts, let alone throw a grenade. But the fact of the matter is that OKW is apparently supposed to mass infantry without putting team weapons to use. Suggesting that OKW players use an hmg is typically met with revulsion about making OKW a 'clone' of ostheer. It's not, okw is supposed to support a mainline with a strong cqb squads until elite units comes. I don't see how is that relevant to change this anyway...the dps if mp40 is negletible. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: OKW self-healing at vet427 Dec 2017, 08:30 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Dec 2017, 21:19 PM__deleted__ Please leave it at vet 4. Rather make them less combat efficient at vet 4 and more at vet 5 but OKW need at least so-so healing so they are not forced to spent 400 manpower and 50 fuel backteching to medics the moment they go mechanised build. Every other faction can go light vehicle and has affordable medics and weapon upgrades. Having to pay 10 munnition for each heal or paying 400 manpower and 50 fuel for healing which other factions get for 250 manpower (and 10 fuel) is for me nonsence. Sorry, but I have never understood the logic behind it, why OKW cannot a ligh vehicle (which is no longer ap problem right now, because it comes when its counterparts) and healing. If there is some good reason behind it, then tell me please That was the main reason healing was tier locked...healing was perfect at vet 3... But you know "balance"... In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: MP40 Volks Under-performing27 Dec 2017, 08:25 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Dec 2017, 08:19 AMblvckdream It seemed fine when I used the firestorm doctrine. Well...last time i checked DBP relased less than a month ago...and you are unranked in every mode with okw, so tell me more about how you think they are strong. You know..for the same reason you are asking him to show testing... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: MP40 Volks Under-performing27 Dec 2017, 02:56 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Dec 2017, 02:22 AMDoomlord52 Then it's still poorly balanced/designed. DBP in a nutshell. The only reason to ever get mp40 is grenades...but he grenade is the RIDICOLOUSLY overglorified model 24 and smoke has a laughable range to be of any kind of use over the normal lava nade. If i wanted to get a good grenade i would go scarvenge/spec ops and still have lava and stg... @RedT3rror oh please...when double bar wasted vet 5 falls in DBP testing the excuse was that double bar costed a lot of muni... Now a sensibly cheaper squad is simply better than a much more expensive squad with same munitions in.... Jump back to quoted post27 Dec 2017, 02:22 AMDoomlord52 As for Obers, I decided to test those as well (3-5 tests each): Vet 0 Cons w/ PPSHs closing from out of range to close range against vet 0 obers will result a tie (usually 1 model left with almost no HP). Vet 0 Cons w/ PPSHs closing from out of range to close range against vet 0 LMG obers will result in obers winning with 2-4 models. Vet 3 Cons w/ PPSHs closing from out of range to close range against vet 5 obers will result in cons winning with 2-3 models. Vet 3 Cons w/ PPSHs closing from out of range to close range against vet 5 LMG obers will result in cons winning with 2-3 models. Ultimate balance... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: DBP Compiled Patch Notes v1.0-v2.023 Dec 2017, 14:57 PM Just to put this up in the list..can we pin it or something ? In: Lobby
Thread: nerf stuka bombing run.23 Dec 2017, 10:39 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Dec 2017, 10:18 AMKpen97 Both have been nerf, maybe read the patch notes, but hey your complaining about getting one clicked after you have cheesed your way through coh2 lol. XD In: COH2 Balance