Profile of jagd wölfe

Yeah sure....

Maybe at your level it works, but at higher levels it won't, especially in teamgames.

Higher than rank 13 ?

[Insert epic facepalm meme here]

When will vet 5 get proper xp requirements ?
The "vet 5 is other factions vet 3" thing must go both ways.

At this moment Vet 2 okw comes at the same time of other factions vet 2.
This means that in smaller game modes is factually impossible to benefit from a "normal" veterancy.

Any hotfix soon ?

From yesterday: Volks in practice

Ultimate balance

What would most likely fix okw..
1) start with normalization of veterancy...xp values should be adjusted so okw units vet up in a realistic amount of time

2) a complete rebalance of mainline considering their role within the faction.
Volks going back to their cannon fodder/cheap/utility unit, removal of stg, cheaper reinforce and base cost. That implies gaining back their old veterancy.
The combat role of volks will be support to early game sturm and late game sturm/obers, they don't need to have smg...they need to be cheaper.

3) a complete rebalance of okw indirect fire, that includes an aoe buff for isg for an higher cost/bigger scatter and a complete rework of stuka that turns creeping barrage into a circular barrage.
The issue isn't how units are placed within tiers...the issue is that half of those are cheesy/useless.
Isg was only good for autofire cheese, now it's only good for smoke.
Stuka wiped crews but had zero anti blob capacity.

4) actual dbp ostheer panzer 4 (stats and pricing), that will highly decrease the gap between luchs and medium

5) a tank destroyer rebalance..jadgpanzer 4 has lost any scaling potential..now it's just the most overexpensive and slow medium/premium counter.

6) a proper 120 muni double shreck package for sturmpios.
Okw needs a decent at option, most of at now is provided by unreliable raketenwerfer and a generalist mine until puma or TD. Other factions have several at measures to scare off tanks. Okw loses the moment it falls behind in resource war.

My point still stands. Moving targets are harder to hit. Light vehicles are on the move 99/100 times, so obviously the raketen has some problems there. It's not unique to the raketen, and please don't try to convince me and others here otherwise.

You can also put the raketen into buildings(unique and very underappreciated), which makes it harder to flank.

Oh, and you also have mines, snares on your mainline, and a panzershreck upgrade on your engineers. That should fill up the reasonable void that the raketen has right now.

Except that is only you saying that...any other user here knows how trashy raketenwerfer is.
No atg miss units like that...not even close.
With extreme low target size..misses may occurr rarely on tergets at the bottom of the atg arc.
The most ridicolous parts is that there isn't such thing as "moving target" at all, accuracy is affected only by the mivement if the unit that is firing...but i DO LOVE how you try so hard (failing) to make it look like you actually have a grasp of basic vehicle/at mechanics of this game.

Putting raketen in building deny cloak and the atg fires on infantry wasting shots, same for sturm shreck...300 mp for something as pathetic as a single shreck squad is ridicolous...
the claim that tools as snares and mines that other factions don't lack should fill the gap (which has no reason to exist to begin with), that sturmshreck is of any use, that raketen garrison is underappreciated (lol), that vehicles are somewhat harder to hit when moving...are ridicolous and only show how short sighted you are with your 2500 4vs4 rank with just 18 matches in.
The real question is why a 2500 rank player feels the need of spreading misinformation based on wrong stats and make pretentious and laughable claims.