Um English please? You talk about proof and then go on to throw out a number without your own proof? LEL btw if the Ratio was 1:3 (Axis/Allies) why do you continue on with allies suffer 1:3? You clearly initially stated Axis Tank (1) to Allies Tanks (3). No suffering there mate. Nothing against you just trying to understand what your going on about.
Sry i was in a hurry. My source is the red army handbook. according to this book [which is written by Russians btw] the soviets lost, give or take, nearly 100 k tracked vehicles to 30 k for the Germans.
Now their are only 3 explanations for this either
1: the Russians where incredibly incompetent which i reject since the red army through leaderless in the early days was still a well trained professional force
2: the Germans had Superhuman abilities . Which i reject as well. They had more experience and better leaders at first but it still shouldn't explain the 1:3 ratio
3: or their was something wrong with the soviet tanks.
I believe number 3 is the most logical conclusion. But their is nothing wrong with the armour or gun of the soviet tanks. so the problem is likely the very poor ergonomics of the soviet tanks. German tankers repeatability have said that soviet tanks where slow to fire and acquire targets. The red army handbook also has a section where soviet tank commanders compared the p4 ausf F with the t-34/85 and came to the conclusion they where equal.
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
