Profile of Zyllen

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 770

General Information


Thread: Riflenades vs. Maxims18 Apr 2015, 13:42 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2015, 13:17 PMBrachiaraidos It's not a matter of spamming maxims It's a matter of rifle nades having enormous ranges and impact detonation and the maximm being a PoS. So your saying that riflenades counter unsupported maxims the same way as usf smoke+ nade counters unsupported mg's. good i believe we have achieved balance. ' As of the last few patches i rarely see maxim spam and if i see them they are purely used as a supportive weapon. So im not unhappy at the moment. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Riflenades vs. Maxims18 Apr 2015, 13:11 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2015, 12:17 PMakula Does anyone find this to be overkill? 2 rifle nades is basically a guaranteed squad wipe.. not hard to pull off at all. I'm not sure how to balance it better but I think Relic needs to give it a look. Dont spam maxims and dont leave it unsupported. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW manpower penalty?17 Apr 2015, 23:24 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Apr 2015, 19:15 PMJHeartless Shrek has small chance to snipe models. Wow I am super duper unlucky since 6-10 engagements its goes off like a Grenade launcher. In fact I have the same luck with Zooks. Both of them will snipe OFTEN the closer you get in an engagement. Now the old PTRS had a LOW chance to snipe models. The whole no AOE thing... Shit happens. last game an at gun managed to snipe 2 grens in a row. now what are the changes for that? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Early game for Ost17 Apr 2015, 20:19 PM The issue is the m20. it arrives far to quickly switch the stuart with the m20 will solve a lot of problems. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW manpower penalty?17 Apr 2015, 17:28 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Apr 2015, 16:05 PMQueenRatchet123 After 20 minutes Cons are just there to screen for AT nades. Rifles get shredded by everything, LMG grens, PGrens ( situational, but they most likely will win), vet 5 volks will beat vet 3 rifles, every fucking tank at that stage will just force stock allied infantry to retreat from their intended counters. You know, the thing that shrek'd volks negate. I bet the next thing u will tell me is that USF lategame is on par with OKW's late game... You want to not float mp as OKW. thats fine, at vet4+ increase the reinforce cost of every infantry unit Also no vet 5 until all tech is researched. That will force u to spend more mp on tech instead of just going straight for panther Holy over exaggerating batman ! grens with lmg's do have an advantage in long range combat but rifles definitely do not get shredded. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW manpower penalty?17 Apr 2015, 16:03 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Apr 2015, 15:57 PMJorad What? What? What? write it plain and simple for me Sry if you cannot understand this then talking to you is a waste of time. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW manpower penalty?17 Apr 2015, 14:52 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Apr 2015, 12:35 PMJorad your post brings nothing here Mature -Better vehicles Flak Halftrack, Puma, Luchs, Jagdpanzer IV, Stuka. The problem is that "efectivnes" of units is determined by "it kills instantly" thus good, "it kills slowly" thus bad. The usf have FAR better variants. the m10 right now blows the puma right out of the water when it comes to cost efficiency . the jp4 trades durability for firepower and mobility. and the luchs still loses to the t-70 despite being a very good infantry killer. The so called more cost effective units is really not showing -And that is why USF (with all its problems) is the best designed faction, because they need their vehicles to survive the mid game other faction dont and that is BS. No technically they only need tanks for AT. and the jackson is awesome AT. -Dont understand you statement Being a punching bag doesnt win you games. damage does. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW manpower penalty?17 Apr 2015, 11:25 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Apr 2015, 06:58 AMJorad OKW float manpower because (my opinion): -some units cost to little pop cap, therefore the mp gain is bigger -Vehicles and tanks are expensive in MP and POP cap, OKW can fight and sometimes win without vehicles and tanks thus more MP -Volks are a cheap meatshield so other units dont get hurt to much. -Damnit i keep hearing that the okw has better or more efficient units im not really seeing this. So which units are so effective? - Every faction can win without tanks safe for the usf. Why do you think that cas is so vilified? - A good offensive can be a much better defence as death units dont do damage. 2 rifles can easily charge into 2 volks and win . try the same thing with regular grens and the only thing you accomplish is losing a lot of mp. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW manpower penalty?16 Apr 2015, 16:36 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Apr 2015, 16:27 PMJHeartless OKW has very efficient units relative to strength survability and pop cap. Its very simple. Soviets can match or surpass their strenght but its very Pop cap inefficient to do so (Guards/STs/IS2) USF can match their or surpass their firepower in certain situations through more spending of resources but lack the Survability so they will always have a higher bleed. AB for example are bleed machines. Strong yes...bleed tons. With Officers and Ambulance just wasting Pop cap. That is in the past. At this moment okw really struggles in infantry battles. im really interested to see their win/loss ratio in 1vs1 now. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF .50 Cal - fragile!16 Apr 2015, 01:20 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Apr 2015, 23:53 PMMr. Someguy Only because the M1919 is imbalanced, it's not a reflection of the entire Allied factions any more than old Obers were a reflection of Ostheer. That would make the ostheer lmg op as well then? because they have the same dps. Every mg at the moment(thank god) will not work unless its in a supporting role. In: COH2 Gameplay