Profile of Zyllen

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 770

General Information


Thread: T-34 needs a buff11 Jun 2015, 12:57 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Jun 2015, 12:49 PMThe_rEd_bEar thats because you obviously dont play coh2 or you only play axis, take your pick FFS 12 pages of worthless name calling with each side calling each other fan boys . Red bear you look like a twat at the moment, mate . show me some respect and have the courtesy to bring arguments to the table why the t-34 need to be buffed or needs a role change. otherwise get lost mate im not interested in fanboy calling In: COH2 Balance
Thread: T-34 needs a buff11 Jun 2015, 11:32 AM I still have not seen a single decent argument why the t-34 needs a buff. the best argument so far is that its not an 85 so it sucks. well i can say the p4 sucks just as much then. but the t-34 is fine save for its shitty vet 1 ability. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer's Panzer IV vs Sherman/T34 Costs 10 Jun 2015, 14:57 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Jun 2015, 13:57 PMFul4n0 since the very moment that a heavy hit the field, and that is just a few minutes after t34 hit the field.... Well that depends on the game but i would say 10 min. but the p4 is in the same boat. they have no chance against the is2 and to an extent, e8 and the 85, as well. both factions need to switch to their dedicated TD's. and that's the problem as neither the ostheer or su have TD's in tier 3 and switching is expensive. so its difficult using tier 3 in the face of the callin meta. and heavies should counter medium armour otherwise there is point in getting them. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: T-34 needs a buff10 Jun 2015, 06:05 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Jun 2015, 05:24 AMnewvan I'm sorry that I suck at foreign languages. First one is simple basic geometry drown by myself, anyone able to make and verify it, geometry wouldn't lie. Second - it just example with ballistic formula, particularly this one from state technological university of Belarus, it wasn't made for Panzer IV ammo, but for shells that are close to it's characteristics, you can find same looking graphics at any ballistic related site. Third - from french site, I think it quite relayable source. For the record mate im done discussing the t-34 in real life. But if you are going to enter a debate you have to provide a lot more information then just throwing 2 random charts to me without any context. i cannot be bothered to look up this university. and why should i do your work! you want to discuss this with me do so by p,m. I don't think his English is that bad, i don't think its hard to comprehend him. He is trying to answer you, using evidence, which is a word you have never heard of LOL! and WTF . In: COH2 Balance
Thread: T-34 needs a buff10 Jun 2015, 03:58 AM @newvan Your English is bad mate. i have no idea what those graphs are or where they come from. but we are here to discuss the t-34. But lets get back to the t-34. its fine for cost and what it is doing. but the t-34 and the p4 long suffered from the fact their is no TD in either tier 3. the result is that your utterly screwed by jacksons as the ostheer and panthers as the SU. Thats why the sherman is so popular with the usf. even if a panther rolls out you only need to wait a few minutes to get your jackson on the field. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: T-34 needs a buff10 Jun 2015, 01:01 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Jun 2015, 00:01 AMnewvan Completely false. depending on what gun the p4 long barrel could knock out a t-34 out between 1000-1500 meters. use this as reference http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7.5_cm_KwK_40 You do realize that 45mm on 60 angle is 90 mm for frontal shoot? It's 45/cos60=90, it's school program. Once again this is false. The t-34 had some major issues in the beginning. But most of those problem was solved during prototype series 1938-1939 and first line productions of 1940. False once again. The Germans realised that they needed better tanks after encountering the much better French and British tanks that the German panzers simply could not handle. when the Germans invaded Russia the panther and tigers where already being designed. Which model of French tank? The idea of 30 ton tank was in development from 1937 by Непschel, but it's interesting that first prototypes was build only after invasion in USSR in 1942. And it must be fearsome British tanks was a reason why first serial Panther wasn't deployed in Africa, but on the other front. 1. mate thats the glacis that will never ever get hit with a straight attack and 30 degrees is very generous. 2. considering how many tanks the soviets where forced to abandon in 1941 its fair to say the t-34 did had problems. it did become a very reliable tank. however the 85 once again had some problems with its suspension that was a bit overburdened 3. bis 1 char with 60 mm sloped armour. and the panthers where not deployed in Africa because they simply did not exist. tigers on the other hand where deployed. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: T-34 needs a buff9 Jun 2015, 23:40 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Jun 2015, 21:37 PMTheSleep3r dayum son, where did you find this? su85 are fine when used in formations, not spammed one being a feet away from the another and su76m's are going to get a fix soon but t-34 sure have problems NDA ffs In: COH2 Balance
Thread: T-34 needs a buff9 Jun 2015, 23:34 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Jun 2015, 22:34 PMSwitzerland Daspoulos has never opened a history book that wasn't biased, if at all apparently. The T34 was only reliably killed by the 88 until the heavier Panzers were developed to kill it. The long barreled Panzer 4 still had to close to a range it could hit back, also that by the time of the long barreled variants appearance, the Russians were firing back with the 85mm. The T34 wasn't just good because it was mass produced, It was successful as it didn't get stuck in mud, didn't light on fire by moving even early in its production, didn't freeze up in the climates the invading Nazi Germany found itself in, and yes was also very easy to put together and was a damn good machine (which as much as it makes you red in the face the Nazi's saw that). Just as if production of the Panzer 4 late variants or Panther would have seen the Nazis off much better than wasting so much time and effort on tanks that equated to the production time of 4 of the less complicated Panzers. Hell someone even posted the prototype i mentioned, its a T34 drawn by German designer lol. I think History speaks for itself, especially when the Germans developed new tanks in direct response to the "shit" T34/76. Thanks for the usual derail Daspoulos back to topic, 76 would be fine in a more AT intensive role to encourage its use, with a fuel increase to bring that in line. As has been mentioned here, bitching about call in Meta and refusing to even hear of buffs for non doc units is pretty dumb when its the lack of good solid stock units that is the root of the issue. Oh boy the t-34 is once again similar to the katana vs long swords discussions. it reached mystical proportions and statistics be damned. The T34 was only reliably killed by the 88 peculiar since half the t-34's in 1941 where knocked out by 50 mm long barrelled p3's and only 9 % by the 88 The long barrelled Panzer 4 still had to close to a range it could hit back Completely false. depending on what gun the p4 long barrel could knock out a t-34 out between 1000-1500 meters. use this as reference http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7.5_cm_KwK_40 It was successful as it didn't get stuck in mud, True but not much of an accomplishment considering the soviets knew their territory while the Germans fought in Europe with its much better infrastructure. didn't light on fire by moving even early in its production Once again this is false. The t-34 had some major issues in the beginning. I think History speaks for itself, especially when the Germans developed new tanks in direct response to the "shit" T34/76. False once again. The Germans realised that they needed better tanks after encountering the much better French and British tanks that the German panzers simply could not handle. when the Germans invaded Russia the panther and tigers where already being designed. However the Germans didn't expect the soviets having the t-34 and en mass converted their obsolete p1 2 and 3's into marders and stugs. The problem is not the t-34 but the fact that the su85 is not in the tier making it very vunrabel to heavies TD's and generalist tanks. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: T-34 needs a buff9 Jun 2015, 21:31 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Jun 2015, 21:26 PMThe_rEd_bEar I dont understand you people, you whine that soviets call ins are op and want it nerf but you dont want stock units buffed? Their is nothing wrong with the t-34 however. My focus would be on the su85 and su76 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: T-34 needs a buff8 Jun 2015, 12:35 PM t-34 is fine. if you compare the stats the t-34 is indeed slightly weaker then the sherman and p4 but not by much. dont expect it to behave like an 85 and it will do well. That the su need a somewhat better and more mobile TD to counter mediums is a given but the su85 is fine against the slower heavies. In: COH2 Balance