Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
I thought it was at most 15 range, but i guess it's just visually confusing at first if you look the distance within the end of the barrel and the Katyusha.
Posts: 1954
I thought it was at most 15 range, but i guess it's just visually confusing at first if you look the distance within the end of the barrel and the Katyusha.
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
Are you really comparing a statistical outlier to something that’s very common?
You can’t make decisions on balance based on one RNG roll.
Shit yeah, the issue of my Churchill missing and bouncing and then refusing to fire at point blank range is all to do with the fact that it was unsupported.
Everyone always does this kind of shit when a video shows them something they don't like, they completely derail the point of the video, its laughable.
Churchill video shows the churchil bouncing at point blank range, then a bug, refusing to fire but of course the point you take from it has got to do with high HP and that it "wasn't supported" (it was a dive, to kill a hetzer with a Churchill, who would have thought it wouldn't work? Much like your Panther video, shit happens hence my comparison to yours)
AT gun video shows the RNG even when you make the odds the best you possibly can, and again, shit happens, but we don't all cry about it
Posts: 1289
Jp4 and Stug are med TDs, they are not ment to face heavy targets. And as for AT mesures against meds, you either can use your own meds or AT guns. When it comes to facing anything else, panther becames better chose, because you can dive in and take a lot of punishment.
You never will be able to out-spam allies TDs with JP4, aswell as, when properly played, allied TDs have an upper hand over stugs.
Allies TDs on the other hand can effectively fight any kind of armored unit, equally effective and equally forgiving.
People mostly go for panthers, simply because they are reliable, you know if you are investing in them you wont be fucked up by rng that bad.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
The rof range and pen of the jp4 vs allied td armour will allow the jp4 to out dps allied td's handely. Esp once vetted.
Allied td's them self have med hp and armour. The jp4 will trade well vs them since its fires faster.
stug and jp4 are medium td's indeed. Why should the panther also cover medium tanks? Right now the panther put both out of work. Cuz as you say its more reliable. Its turret higher pen better mobility and higher hp and armour makes it so.
And why does the panther that already puts both stug and jp4 on the side line need a buff of any kind?
Allies cant use their med vs med as effectively cuz of the armour difference.
Posts: 772
Watch the last tournament.
Posts: 1515
Give a hint. doctrinal 76mm m4 with rubbish AOE does not represent 'allied mediums' well.
Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1
And why does the panther that already puts both stug and jp4 on the side line need a buff of any kind?
Posts: 195
Posts: 69
Posts: 5279
why not just gives panthers nondoc smoke and reduce its overall armor so that way allied Mediums can have a fighting chance against panthers, but gives Panthers some protection against Tank destroyers
Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1
because allied mediums are not supposed to have a chance against panthers
Posts: 1289
Because of its hit-and-run nature, panther need to expose itself to the enemy and usually used in a agressive pushes or flanking maneuvers, it wont stay behind the lines and shot. And for hit-and-run vehicle panther misses way to often, considering you need to dodge AT guns and snares by constant movement.
Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1
Its already very durable and fast for its role. Its acc is not bad by any means. Its just not as good as allied td's accuracy.
But they are either not fast have no turret and defenitly are not durable
People just need to stop panthers before it shoots. They just see that shermans and jackson hit more often on the move and forget that those have paper armor to offset that faction boon.
They just want the best of everything else. A clear and cut case of the grass is greener on the other side and i want it as well.
If it becomes more accurate eithers its durability needs to go down by no small amount or its speed/mobility.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
*Frontally that is
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1
You have failed as a player and should uninstall if you actually allowed any kind of med to hit rear of your panther without literally pushing it alone to allies base sectors.
Posts: 1954
remove the Mg upgrade on panther can be an option to off set further buff
Posts: 1289
Allied TDs have more range. You cant compare them to panther, because they can engage any axis armor frontally aside from ET\Ele\JP4 without taking any damage and exposing themselfs.
Also you are overglorifing accuracy buff, it wont make it sniper like tank, it just would make it less frustrating and more consistent to use. You wont even notice this change in the game.
Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1
I am not comparing them directly. Only stating the differences. A fast durable tank needs a weakness or area its less good at. Naturaly that would be acc or low rof.
I you wont notice the acc buff why does it need to get it?
The panther is already consistent in that no med has a chance vs it. Only td's and max range and super heavies do.
 |
|
|
38 | ||
 |
|
|
135 | ||
 |
|
|
57 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
