Profile of Mr Carmine

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1289

General Information


Thread: Stats for usf mortar7 Jan 2023, 13:18 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Jan 2023, 07:40 AMVipper Since we have established that chart are not wrong, in your opinion are M1's stats "trash"? Its not trash. But in the total picture off the faction it doesnt fit. Maybe i am wrong but it has less range then other standard mortars. Why idk. The mg for usf is more expensive and comes out later doesnt supress as good/fast, their mainlines are mid range oriented and more expensive. And beter options are there later down the line. So my question to you is dispite its stats not being trash does it work or better is it worthwhile in the usf faction? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Stats for usf mortar5 Jan 2023, 19:14 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Jan 2023, 21:01 PMVipper Do you have any reason to believe this data is wrong other that the do not agree with your opinion? Because I can't find anything wrong with them. And I actually see the USF mortar and UKF one if available in many in large modes. Tell you what for your next 10 4vs4 game count how many time a USF player build one and share your stats. Noni dont think ots wrong data. I just wanted to make the point that not just because some1 shows data its 100 true or correct. As i said i rarely see usf mortars. Playing 10 games wich happen to have usf isent gonna change that. It doesnt fit the faction in both their current state imo. Usf is to different for a mortor to work like they do for ost and soviets and even those mortars arent as popular as before. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Stats for usf mortar4 Jan 2023, 18:53 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Jan 2023, 09:40 AMVipper That is a nice generalization but it does not really say much in this case. Are you actually saying that these particular chart are wrong? If so what where are they wrong? it happend before that outdated or mis interpeted stats where used. And i am not saying wrong just seeing how the usf mortar is percieved preforming it is suprising to see the charts Do you actually have any data to support you claim that M1 does not see much action? Even more importantly do you how its usage compares to other mortars? i dont need a sheet with data to state something obvious. from what i see in 1s esp mortars have fallen out of favor a bit. The usf mortar i rarely see in 1s or any mode and streams. This probably has to do with its preformance but mostly other reasons such as better options timing/being down a rifle squad Removing smoke riflemen was the correct decision and the game at the time was at bad state where smoke grenades was where being used constantly and there was little counter to them. Mainline infatry should not have smoke grenades in the first place. I agree that mainlines should not have smoke but if that faction is incomplete or have a weird tech path i can understand the need. Wich usf is currently imo. They removed/redesigned a key design feuture without much thought and called it a day. Do you think current rifles are balanced cost to preformance/micro and can they be an actual mainline? Imo no they are not, high cost and high micro for okay isch results. Hence paths etc etc. I dont want an answer to this, just saying. There are also others things that shoudnt be, such as the latest implementation off arty off maps on tank commanders with no noticable downside to the tanks preformance, outright destroying arty pieces 100% of the time with lill risk. One having shared cooldowns on nades cuz its to strong while the other doesnt. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Stats for usf mortar3 Jan 2023, 20:19 PM Opinions can be based in facts. Just like charts/sheets can be filled with wrong data. If the usf mortar is truly very close to gw pm41 or so close you almost cant messure a differnce it would see more action esp vs osther. But it doesnt see much if any action. So either it isent nearly as good or usf has no room for it to operate, because it struggles to much in other eares. I for one think now that removing smoke from rifles and then having the mortar or rear echelons/officers provide smoke was the wrong solution esp since rifles didnt get a significant buff elsewhere imo. The micro and units/recources required to smoke an mg for example is to high for the reward right now. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why don't axis factions get access to demo charges?2 Nov 2022, 21:25 PM The demo stealth nerf should have never happend. The cost should have just been shot up to 150 or even 200 muni so that using it wipe a single squad is far less feasable and economic. Now its just seen by anything with 2 legs and luchs atguns and jgdpzr 4 can be hidden easier wich is quite stupid. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: nerf the fking pathfinder and Howitzer24 Oct 2022, 15:39 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Oct 2022, 12:30 PMVipper Good That is not true if it was just vision a single Pathfinder would be enough. Again one of the issue of pathfinder is that thei are being use as mainline infatry replacing riflemen when that is not their intended role. As for their orientation there is not since their scope rifles are far oriented but the elite carbines are mid to close weapons. They should either be designed as a support unit or as alternative mainline but than they would probably have to lose thing like camo/scoped m1/extra sight. Indeed i said as well that vision isent the only thing. It just contributes a lot just as camo in avoiding damage and also giving situational awarenes. Allowing you to do more damage then you would otherwise. If you take either away they will still surplant rifles i bigger modes imo. If you take both away well i think usf will be gutted in bigger modes if rifles arent fixed. Having a cost to their scoped rifles rifles or stealth would be best. And rifles squads need a way to reduce bleed in the late game. Major tech reducing reinforcement costs would be a good and or squads after major start with 1 bar plus reduced reinforce cost. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: nerf the fking pathfinder and Howitzer24 Oct 2022, 10:37 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Oct 2022, 09:59 AMVipper PLS focus on Pathfinder instead of me. I am not going to follow you in this path that derails the thread. Vision is not the only issue of Pathfinders, its only one, there are others. I dont agree the thread is being derailed. But i agree with focusing to much on you. I will try and avoid doing that. That pathfinders can replace riflemen is because of their vision. This helps immensly in avoiding damage same esp combined with stealth and long range orientation. If iether is changed that wont change much in them replacing rifles imo. Rifles esp in big modes will still be replaced by paths. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: nerf the fking pathfinder and Howitzer23 Oct 2022, 09:26 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Oct 2022, 22:07 PMVipper You are guessing want I want now, I suggest you stick to what I actually post. This is thread about Pathfinder and howizters. If in your opinion riflemen need changes I suggest you start a thread about them. Pioneer and Pathfinders have very little in common, If you are not aware of it I suggest you try to spaming Pionners and what happens. Now you are assuming what annoys me, I suggest you keep your focus on the Pathfinders and Howizters and not me. I am not geussing anything. You are doing excatly that. You refuse to acknolidge anything that is not mentioned in the title of the thread. Even obvious underlying issues. Just "go make a thread about x yourself" every time. This is no way to fix anything. While you also have quite a history of bringing in anything to prove a point. The issue is with vision in general. Vision is very underrated and it actualy makes some units and synergies to strong. Paths and pio's to a lesser extent imo prove larger vision on main stay units being a problem. Packhowi and scott on its own are ok imo. Vision wich pathf bring in abundance make the howi and scott much more effective. Rifles not being appealing esp in bigger modes make this even more problematic. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: nerf the fking pathfinder and Howitzer22 Oct 2022, 18:19 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Oct 2022, 16:12 PMVipper And this is what some other people have to say about riflemen: Bringing another unit in debate is one thing, ranting about how OP pioneers and suggesting nerfs them for several post in thread about Pathfinder is another. Pathfinder still need fixing despite riflemen/pios/HMG-42 and Liz Truss. Panthfinder need adressing yes indeed. But so do lots of other things including rifles. You just want paths nerfed and be done with it. Thats where the issue stops for you. I bring in units or things related to the isseu. The issue with paths is mostly their vision from stealth wich increases the power of scotts and pack howies greatly. And they dont bleed you dry. The issue imo with rifles i stated earlier. I brought up pio's sight because to a less extreme fashion it does a simaler thing yet its fine and stock. I never said pio's are op. They give an already very strong mg an edge to early. I dont find it an issue later in the game. I cant help it that you get so annoyed that as soon as some one says axis units need fixing too. You always jump in to try and disprove and state all is fine or up and do a 180° when it concerns allied units, then almost everthing about them is fine or op. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: nerf the fking pathfinder and Howitzer22 Oct 2022, 15:05 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Oct 2022, 09:19 AMVipper And just because it has been "said" by some people it does not mean it true but not really the topic of this thread. that doesnt mean its wrong. That more then some players avoid rifles after they got wiped is an good indication. The overuse of pathf ties into rifles. You cant just state in a vacuum x unit is UP or OP. Or that is simply an indication of how good USF elite infatry are yes that is true. Just other factions use/replace their mains more then just their stock or doctrinal elite. If you want to talk about Pioneer sight I suggest you start a thread about it since this one is about Pathfinders and howitzers. its sometimes neccesary to bring other units in to establish the claims or disprove them, you off all people should understand this In: COH2 Gameplay