Profile of GachiGasm

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: EFA halftracks late game30 Oct 2020, 15:43 PM Bad Idea honestly. No other faction has mobile reinforcement platform that can deal damage\suppresion. Actually, docs aside, the only other faction that has some what mobile reinforcement is USF. At least M5 and 251 are tanky and can take additional hits before getting down. All this will provide is easier way to blob with M5 supprssing everything, and 251 burning the shit out of defences. The only problem is that M5 hit the field way too late and has small window of frontline usage. But both vehicles past frontline usage phase have their usage, M5 being loiter deleter and flank protector, and 251 is a hit-and-run vehicle. All this will lead to - frustrating gameplay to play against. If one want mobile reinforcement that badly, he can always buy another M5\251 and use it appropriatly. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Zis Barrage need longer cooldown28 Oct 2020, 23:02 PM If anyone would want to change barrage without removing it or making more expensive, I would have rather see it shooing like a JT. So at least cover and other blocks, would requre you to possition your zis. In any case, aurgument that soviets dont have easy access to nades, thefor they need Barrage is somewhat true, honestly soviets having grenades would have been much better. Unlike nades zis pretty much forces any support weapon to relocate like instanly, paired with your attack, you are able to breach enemy defences with much less efford then a player who has to flank with multiple squads and throw nades. Not to mention, that stock soviet mortar is still shit, which is tecnically supposed to be way to counter support weapons and deffences. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Obersoldaten and their Timing27 Oct 2020, 23:39 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Oct 2020, 22:37 PMKatitof allowing them into early game means 100% light vehicle play against OKW being forced upon allies, which then is hardcountered by puma. Like it isnt the case already. UKF always gets AEC and USF either sturt or AAHT, let alone soviet T70. If as alies, you skip LVs then you are roflstomping your opponent really hard. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW needs buff?27 Oct 2020, 01:52 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Oct 2020, 01:16 AMthedarkarmadillo Look if you are trying to tell me that the faction designed specifically to be strained for resources is struggling to afford buying everything like a faction that isn't designed to be resource starved I'm not just gunna willy nilly take your word for it. Imma need hard numbers and replays. I've also heard rumors that usf is supposed to mobile and all their units are good on the move from elite infantry hip firing lmgs, to moving modifiers on armour. Now of course both of these things would be a travesty because faction design is a sin and all factions should be able to throw all the grenades they want and slap weapons on every squad and snare every tank and lay all the mines and still naturally have bounds of munitions for everything. I know... I KNOW they call it a tactical real time strategy game but I'd really like it a lot more of they took out the tactical and strategy parts. I don't want to make decisions,hell,if the game could play itself entirely I'd be OK with that. Yeah alright, all cool, but can we make faction strained in other logical ways, for a change? This is retarded in its core, that faction is stripped of essential part of game, not grenades, not snipers, not lack of X thing, but from core game mechanic. Healing is not a simple decision, it what every single faction had to get at rufly same timing. Bad desing is bad desing, and so called "faction themed around something", is not applyable here. Shitty healing came from Panzerschreck volks ages where it didnt matter if you go for med or mech. Right now in 99% scenarios as OKW you want to go mech to have proper lucks+puma combo (from 1v1 perspective), otherwise you gonna have a bad time, going med is either: 1) Enemy way too campy, you need igs 2) You need healing WAY too badly And you know it just as good if you play 1v1 or at least watch decent players play. I understand that you love your concept of so called "decisions" and "faction uniqueness", but ones again applying this to any of core mechanic is just plain bad. Even if you want, it could have been 1 create for a resonable price (10\15 muni) so at least you wont bleed munitions like a pig, which you NEED to spend on upgrading you inf, its not a decision whether you want upgrades or you dont. Lets strip faction from minesweapers and lock them behind something you need to shoot your leg for and lock yourself from 10 things you need to get 1 because you badly need it, and call it "decision making". In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW needs buff?26 Oct 2020, 23:03 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Oct 2020, 21:46 PMthedarkarmadillo Okw doesn't have a healing problem. They have the most stock healing options of any faction besides the brits who despite having the very best in the game keep getting given more.. it just requires resources of you don't pick bghq. They do have healing problem, its not problematic to get heals (if you kept you STs alive), its the fact that its too expensive with a stupid mechanic behind it. Soviets can spend 250MP for perma heal Ostheer 150MP and 60muni US 250MP and 10Fu UKF 30muni(?). But let it be UKF healing is one of the most unfair, if not the most, things in the entire game. All of this are more or less 1 time buy upgrades OKW spend 45muni, for a 3 AOE heals, which force you to heal in a specific moments, where most of your troops are in base in order to make most of this heals. Add to the mix that Volks already have to get StGs to get maximum from their perfomance and get into their small advantage window or stay at least valid, aswell as use nades quite often depending on match up. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [OKW] FlammPanzer Hetzer 26 Oct 2020, 22:44 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Oct 2020, 22:29 PMaerafield Nobody is ever building Obersoldaten before purchasing Panzer Authorization Well to be fair here, why would you want build obersoldaten without LMG, if by the time you can build them, they will face vetted and upgranned inf. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 2 USF bugs 26 Oct 2020, 16:46 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Oct 2020, 22:29 PMSturmpanther replay? Didnt save it sadly. But from my observation I'm 100% sure that: 1) It had close to\less then 160 HP 2) It had broken engine 3) It was behind the frontline with nothing shooting at it 4) When I exited it, bailout voice line played 5) After crew died, it had same amout of HP, I retreated it with, meaning that it wasnt some random shell hit from the heavens, because HP would have changed in this case The only thing I'm not sure Was it still having in combat status when I exited it. Also on I side note, today when I was testing it, trying to recreate this bug, I managed to do something different. Pretty much I lovered HP of jackson to like ~50-100, gave it both engine criticals and left it under sturmpio fire to keep in combat status. One time when I was exiting and entering it, I managed to give it some sort of an "out of controll" status, where it was moving in a direction it was moving, before I click exit vehicle, being completly uncontrollable (I couldnt even select or click on it), and after moving for like 8-10 seconds, crew finally jumped out. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Zis Barrage need longer cooldown26 Oct 2020, 16:36 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Oct 2020, 15:09 PMgbem the jackson is another story... even now i wonder why the devs decided to put the faction with the most kickass earlygame infantry with the strongest lategame tank destroyer.... It wasnt like this originally, I belive jackson was ment to be used as a flanking TD and fast TD, with decent penetration, but design didnt work because behemoths like elephant\KT\JT when didnt care about much about that and pretty much when supported they were unkillable. Point is being that all other TDs lack the turret or in case of FireFly have poor ROF, Jackson retain all of the advantages it had (range and mobility) while got proper penetration of other TDs. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Zis Barrage need longer cooldown26 Oct 2020, 13:57 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Oct 2020, 13:55 PMgbem i think the zis has lower penetration than the pak40 aswell but im not confident enough to put stakes on it... No, it has identical penetration. You might think so, because some of axis units have more armor, meaning that it might sometimes feel like it has lower penetration. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Zis Barrage need longer cooldown26 Oct 2020, 13:53 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Oct 2020, 12:18 PMMr Carmine Its at has been buffed buts its still not as good as other atguns in raw at power. Please, stop bringing this non-sence. ZiS has ~1 second slower reload then PaK, this is the single difference in AT perfomance. They are litteraly identical in everything else. Will you sacrifice 1 second for 6 men crew and AI barrage? I guess its a good trade off dont you think? In: COH2 Balance