Profile of Balanced_Gamer

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 783

General Information


Thread: 70 ammo for just 1 Panzerschreck still, Why?14 Aug 2019, 15:29 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Aug 2019, 15:16 PMDangerous-Cloth I know, that is why we can't lower their price. But not lowering their price means we can't really lower the price of the shrecks either, because they are better. I know they can be put on any squad, but that doesn't beat the point that they are worse than a shreck. I have used your argument myself in the past, but on the point of shrecks being 70 muni for one, I think it is fine. It definitely does not deserve to be anywhere near 70 ammo just for 1 Pzschreck. If take SU AT package which is 60, it provides 2 PTRS being not equivalent to the 1 Pzschreck but being nearly twice as efficient. Why? Because in 7-8 seconds PTRS does around 240-280 damage while Panzershreck does 120 damage. Only a second after would deal 240 damage for Panzerschreck but the PTRS would deal even around 300 damage. I do not see the point at all in keeping it 70 ammo when its clearly not the best. Sure better than bazooka, but not that much better than the PTRS package. Does not justify at all. It should simply be 60 ammo. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: RAKETENWERFER, Stay or Change. What say you?14 Aug 2019, 15:23 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Aug 2019, 15:07 PMGrumpy I think camo on the move should be taken out for all units. The raketen got much better after the last changes they did to it (IIRC, they eliminated some of the colliding with terrain). However, I still have times when a vehicle will drive through a large part of the firing arc and the raketen won't fire. I don't know what stat affects this but I'd rather have it improved than getting a 5th man. You do make a point about rather getting the Rak to actually shoot or even react properly instead of getting 5th man. I have been experiencing that already too many times to even keep track of it. The arc Range I think and Width improvements might even help contribute into solving this issue since Raks is totally limited. Could explain why it has those kinds of problems. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: LELG is overperforming by ALOT14 Aug 2019, 15:05 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Aug 2019, 14:50 PMblancat pak howi is fine also Leig is fine Do not touch them anymore I think so too Jump back to quoted post14 Aug 2019, 10:35 AMblvckdream Leig is very OP I admit. Maybe make it a bit more expensive and same AOE as trash USF Pak Howi. After all we want a balanced game right? What is OP about the Leig anyway. The only thing that I notice it is good at is static positions and static units. Other than that, it is not as great in contrast to most other mortars since it provides more kills from what I have actually noticed. LEIG provides only damage and not so much kills as in contrast to most other mortars from my experiences. What I do know is, in order to get kills with LEIG, you actually need 2 since its AOE is what is actually hindering it. Not only hinders kills but vet also. I may be be wrong about the way it performs but that is what I think about it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 70 ammo for just 1 Panzerschreck still, Why?14 Aug 2019, 14:59 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Aug 2019, 14:55 PMUnit G17 This argument again... Note that zooks can be equipped by any squads in any amounts. On the other hand only sturms can equip schrecks, and having more than 1-2 sturms is generally a bad idea. Point stated. Good response! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: RAKETENWERFER, Stay or Change. What say you?14 Aug 2019, 14:55 PM That MG post, some decision were pretty irrational. I actually think that both MG34 and mostly Maxim should get some improvements. Back to the topic: I think changing it simply into a pak38 would simply fix the problem since Raketenwerfer is simply rubbish overall. But I doubt that since they are not willing to add more units. I think the only alternative is to make changes on the Raketenwerfer. I mean who knows, possibly they have Pak38 in stock and could replace it. Hopefully. Why I suggested 5 man is because of the fact they die rather easily, which is a huge problem. They have to camo, in order to get close, and getting closer means increase substantially their overall received accuracy. They already have the worst RA modifier meaning they will die the fastest. Really the worst support AT weapon designed in game. How crazy is that. It needs either a replacement or a complete revamp because it is simply poorly designed. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Remove coh2 in-game chat14 Aug 2019, 14:44 PM There simply should be a report button available. I have encountered some players who were pretty toxic and insulting. Report button (although its unfortunately not available in Coh2, have to report in forums instead) should shut them up like most games do which is a pretty good system. Like "Heroes and Generals" report player for a particular purpose and someone will check to see what kind of activity they have commited. A report button that is accessible should be available. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: 70 ammo for just 1 Panzerschreck still, Why?14 Aug 2019, 14:31 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Aug 2019, 14:06 PMMaret It's easy to make same changes for Sturmpio too. 1. Start unit is volk 2. Sturmpio could build only after first building will be deployed. They have mp-40, not stg-44. Becomes cheaper to 260, stats decreased accordingly. Get faust instead volks. Could get bolster upgrade +1 man. Could been upgraded to heavy sappers or at-hunters (only 1 upgrade). 3. After T3 (mechanazed truck with wstuka and p2) will be deployed, you can purchase for them upgrade that increase speed of repair and will get them 2 stg-44 with stun grenade - heavy sappers. You can't make repair station upgrade. 4. Can get AT-package - 2 shrecks, at-satchel instead faust, ability to detect armor in mini-map. Lost all engeener abilites - At-Hunters. Great idea you should create a forum about this exactly. I like the idea since it fulfills Sturmpios designated role better. Reduces Volks spam in this way since it would be removed from them. It is better this way. Your idea is simply rational and ideal. Great job! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: RAKETENWERFER, Stay or Change. What say you?14 Aug 2019, 14:26 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Aug 2019, 13:59 PMgbem ohh and never trust poll results... note how many axis noobs voted the MG-42 as the worst MG ingame... kinda proving how much bias exists in the forums... That is unfortunately true. Especially some allied fanboys. It would be great if many could come up with rational ideas and conclusions instead since these responses often bring better results for games. ______ Love all of your guys ideas so far! Very Rational In: COH2 Balance
Thread: RAKETENWERFER, Stay or Change. What say you?14 Aug 2019, 13:45 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Aug 2019, 13:28 PMShadowLinkX37 Poll count D: but yeah it's frustrating. I'd like changes but idk if they're even considering it on the balance team. :/ I really hope they do though. Is it not what most people in this community want. Change the Raketenwerfer if I am not mistaken? Jump back to quoted post14 Aug 2019, 13:18 PMgbem the rak is both frustrating to use and to fight against... on one hand its useless as a lone AT gun as it pretty much melts to a medium under a few hits on the other if you get two of em you can easily hunt down and kill mediums abusing that retarded camo system... i suggest the rak be reworked into a proper AT gun... a pak 38 with USF AT gun stats + TWP or some other ability available at vet 0... I feel you also. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 70 ammo for just 1 Panzerschreck still, Why?14 Aug 2019, 13:41 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Aug 2019, 13:30 PMMaret You need: 1. First brit building 2. Bolster squad upgrade 3. Build at least one squad of royal eng (1 sturmpio you have from start) 4. Build T4 5. Make Anvil 6. Purchase sappers upgrade (they will get lmg's with armor + repair speed boost, but debuf to movement speed) Only after all these stages Royal engeeners will get speed of repair like sturmpio have. What I saying is, what Royal Engineers can acquire, is far better off than Sturmpios only repair upgrades. Royal Engineers in the proccess improves combat capabilities against AI making it way better than Sturmpio since it can not even scale on like they do. Thus Sturmpio AI capability is rendered useless in contrast. Repair is just one part of it. The rest, All the Royal Engineer has. Better AI and AT support after 10 min until the end. Better Survivability if purchase Bolster. Improves also repair making nearly as equivalent. All in all, makes the Royal Engineer far better off. Anvil makes their repair speed better than just 5 man at the end. Royal Engineers will get the same repair speed or faster late game but everything else, AI , AT , survivability is what they will have early that Sturmpio will never even get. The huge difference is, Royals Engineer can scale. Sturmpio cant. In: COH2 Balance