Profile of Balanced_Gamer

To be honest the current Rak is amazing due to two things, the 270MP and the stealth mechanic. The use of 2 Raks with stealth definitely gives the player more option for strategic ambushes. Also, I dont think Raks have too much problem with penetration from by experience. Yes, raks struggle with Churchill and heavy tanks but you should be able to have some armor available.

Also, the stealth mechanic is EXTREMELY useful for sneaking up on Priest and Kats in large modes.

Rak is mostly extremely useful in sneaking. Rak definitely has good enough penetration.

In terms of supporting however, not so much. Supporting lights in general is just terrible.

For 270 manpower, I would pick every time over the USF AT gun since a way better support weapon. Mostly due to the fact it is far superior against both lights and mediums. That is why I prefer it.

I like the Rekt as they are now. At this point if the community wants to fix the OKW AT gun problem might as well give them a pak!

I like the changes that finally coming to the Rak.

I just they make it from a recon to a proper AT gun. Since that was always the case. I would say make it like USF AT gun instead.


What I explained about Flak Half Track, it is how it currently is now.

Rak and Sturmpio AT sucks in supporting the FHT, simply terrible.

AEC and STUART just goes directly without, often giving second thoughts. Easily destroys the FHT because neither Rak nor Sturmpio can deal with lights properly.

less aoe OHK and more range for autoattack.

The ISG has great range fires really accurate and fast and costs literally nothing for its performance all while volks have free flame nades.

Pack howie is the only reliable way to counter wehr mortar without the mortar half track.

ISG is ok but I would not consider it that good. It is viable.

What is "OHK" by the way?


I think what would be an interesting feature is for Pack Howizters price to be cheaper in manpower and add ammo to the cost.

An example would be: 260 manpower and 80 ammo for instance (something similar)

At least they would hit the field more at the cost of ammo. I think the MP cost is much although it is pretty powerful

I would sooner add more value to the package than make it cheaper because of the reason I mentioned before. Passive vehicle detection? Maybe a snare? Faster mine planting? More mines? Better mines? I'll admit I'm not entirely sure but am sure that a cheaper package would have a negative impact on the game.

It already has a negative impact on it being currently expensive and not being utilized at all by most due to its inefficiency.

Though they should add something in order to prove that its worth for that investment of 70 ammo.

Faster mine planting is not that good an idea.

Snare would suit though a weaker version like the Fusiliers I think would be good. Since every allied factions has AT available with snares. Why cant they have too!

Now is just simply worthless.

The power of the Shrek is that in an instant it will deliver 120 damage without chance of bouncing any core non hammer/anvil allied vehicles. It's a snap shot damn near guaranteed damage. Again, making it too affordable will allow the newly buffed Sturm to be less of a risk for the reward if you lead with multiple. Very bad direction

That is pretty true.

I really do like the changes that are coming for the Sturmpio, finally in terms of scaling and that nade that was hardly ever used. That I am quite thankful for, the changes that are coming.


I think the AT package has to be somehow available and viable.

I mean for 1 Panzerschreck for 70 ammo, you have to admit, it is a lot.

If I compare and contrast the Pzgrens package which is 100 ammo, being only costing +30 more ammo, it is much more worth the effect and investment.

Even comparing and contrasting the Penals package is pretty much better for a cheaper price. Both Pzgrens and Penals packages performing at an efficient rate, with a good price.


Sturmpio AT is just not at an efficent rate nor is it at a good price.

I do not see how you can use much out of 1 Panzerschreck for 70 ammo, price and efficiency, simply not matching.

It should at least shoot slightly faster by 1 or 2 seconds max. Then that would have a punch and effect. For that 70 ammo. Dont you think it deserves that for its price?

Maybe the AT package should be either revamped or given to some other unit instead?