Profile of SeductiveCardbordBox

Yeah like its super overrated too.
A long distance troop rushing in is not suspicious at all. But thats none of my business.

They can move through cover in stealth and have a hold fire button for a reason.

Again, factically wrong. Its called conditional probability. You assumed JLI have grenades and that only happens when a player has chosen a JLI AND a assault grenade commander, each being 2/7 of the OKM commander pool.
The chance for OKM to have grenade JLI from a raw pick is (2/7)(2/7)= 8%
That is way too low to consider them having nades...

I said nothing even remotely related to that. I said half the commanders who can bring JLI have infiltration grenades. There are two JLI commanders, one of them has the grenades. Stop trying to be smart.

Also, you didn't even do the irrelevent percentageright. One of seven commanders (you only get to pick one per game) has the JLI/Assault Grenades combo, that's just a flat percentage of commanders, what on earth are you prattling on about. Some sort of nonsense hypothetical question of 'what are the odds of somebody bringing both Scavenge and Overwatch in one loadout?' Even if that WAS a question, people's commanders are not rolled by an RNG system, so you can't just calculate a proability on them. It's a player choice. You would have to do data analysis to get any meaningful conclusion.

nah pathfinder have better dps and can get bars

That only matters if you are firing against a kubelwagen/WC51

The higher snipe point and cover ignoring mean that JLI get kills much faster and their effective DPS accounting for crits is through the roof.

And then they ALSO get be to twicw as hard to kill, and sprint, and grenade volley, etc. Etc.

I remember the Quad use to be insane. Pretty sure it was one of those units buffed into being op and then nerfed into irrelevance.

It never used to wreck units. But it did used to be a suppression monster.

Naturally, when nerfing the Soviets, only a sledgehammer will do.

Suppression is a utility novelty not the only thing needed on HMGs

Gonna print this out and send it to an art gallery.

It's also the only thing I will address directly. If you believe a HMG is foremost a damage tool, there is literally no point dicussing HMG balance with you. There is literally no overlap between what we believe.

I'll be on the side of the fence where all the MG tooltips helpfully inform us about how helpful they are for suporessing infantry.

SO now you've moved from performance to cost you keep changing ur narrative, initially your issue with MG's was they struggled with performance, nothing about its cost. You keep making claims that the allied MG's cant do the basics (while u claim the mg34 does, even though it the worst from the lot, this is a clear contradiction on your part), and that statement is simply untrue. if cost alone is the issue for you then fine reduce the costs.

Allow me to try and explain the conceot of Cost Efficiency to you. It is the method by which price and efficiency are interlinked.

A unit which costs more... does better. That's it! It can be made more nuanced (long vs short range, utility, durability vs damage, cap speed, line of sight). But the core of it is that you get what you pay for, nice and easy.

The MG34 is worse than the MG42. It is also cheaper.

The maxim is worse than the MG42. It costs the same.

The maxim is worse than the MG34. It is more expensive. And don't 'bias'me on this, it is a worse suppression platform.

Specifically, the maxim is so bad that is no longer properly functions as a suplression platform, which is the one thing people actually byy nachine guns for! That's bad.



We don't want 230mp terr8ble machine guns. That just promotes spam. We want the machine guns we have to simply be woeth their cost.




Cost efficiency also applies to MG AP rounds. The DshK and .50 are both more expensive than the MG42 and are supposed to be soft counters to light vehicles. However, the MG42 gets superior AP and does that job better... as well as suppressing better, and being cheaper.