Profile of distrofio

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2358

General Information


Thread: Bring back vet.3 +33% barrage range maybe?2 Sep 2020, 12:54 PM +33 barrage range seems reasonable. It still requires micro. It helps with high veterancy vs new mortar squads survival It makes some vet3 mortars more useful for rather tight situations, the ideal scenario for fully vetted units. It should be taken account of the barrage dispersion and aoe though, because if you increase the barrage range it will also increase the spread and that means the barrage will be close to useless with the current settings In: COH2 Balance
Thread: More Ideas about the Universal Carrier2 Sep 2020, 12:49 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Sep 2020, 07:38 AMMr. Someguy Maybe the UC could apply the squad's 'cover bonus' if they're nearby, to encourage dismounting in the early game? I would really love to see more UC+IS combination rather than IS+sandbag. It raises the skill level and justifies the IS power level. This could mean a slight IS buff too. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: More Ideas about the Universal Carrier2 Sep 2020, 12:48 PM I only used manned UC to transport troops under MG42s fire in very early game. I like the OP idea In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SU-85 and SU-761 Aug 2020, 01:45 AM Even when i agree with maret about Su76, there is a slight problem Either Su76 should compete with T70 (wich is great) and the only way to do so its actually giving more mobility and AI to Su76 (also a turret) or it should compete against double ZIS guns, while being also a self propelled unit. To excel ZIS guns, Su76 should get more AT power (roughly speaking) and that is a general concensus, but why would you do that when SU85 already got that job well covered? So the only trick left for Su76 to do is simply survive rocket barrages, the same ones that a ZIS gun would not survive. It is quite costly for that matter, but maybe it can be tweaked into a better unit somehow. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tiger VI Overnerfed?1 Aug 2020, 01:39 AM How not to offtopic: Dont talk about about pershing in a tiger thread. Simple. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Shock grenade30 Jul 2020, 03:24 AM price up should be fair. Its good, but also cheapskate good. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SU-85 and SU-7630 Jul 2020, 03:22 AM i think mostly of Su76 as a premium ZIS gun. Therefore i would like to make it more durable against mediums rathen than breaking the SU85 balance. If Su76 were a little more vulnerable (specially with the rear armor) to small arms fire, it could have as a bonus a "stationary" mode that decreases its target size, ideal for ambushing. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M3A1 scout car scaling30 Jul 2020, 03:18 AM IMO light tiers vehicles are trashables. M3A1 having lategame is good, but not fundamentally important Mainlines on the other side are not discardables, unless we consider ostruppen. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tiger nerf29 Jul 2020, 02:23 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Jul 2020, 17:37 PMaerafield I think it's debatable if its worth to pay an extra 45 fuel and 140 manpower for a Panther that is more durable and has P4 anti inf. I would say it can totally be worth it It actually depends on how easily your investment goes down against TD's. To put it lightly, Panthers at least can stay behind a line of infantry or ATGs to fullfill their role, Tigers can breakthrough though, but it becomes each time more expensive towards lategame when allied AT power outclasses axis krupp stahl In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW IR HT27 Jul 2020, 17:04 PM OKW has the best units ingame. Giving them OP recon is simply OP. In: COH2 Balance