Profile of distrofio

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2358

General Information


Thread: Civil discussion about OKW29 Nov 2018, 02:18 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Nov 2018, 22:40 PMButcher My only problems with OKW are that 1) it effectively lost its vet 5 bonuses yet still can't build caches, 2) the StG 44 upgrade for Volks isn't worth it and blocks all the squads weapon slots. Yea, OKW need some buffs urgently, if you check https://www.coh2.org/topic/83846/ac-2v2-statistics-wildcard-qt1-qt2 stats, OST and OKW had the lowest winrates... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Civil discussion about OKW28 Nov 2018, 18:28 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Nov 2018, 00:19 AMBonerForest What exaclty is the disadvantage of OKW? There is none. This: Avoid OKM powerspikes, or be ready for their offensives. If you cant predict the enemy attacks you have already failed. All factions have disadvantages. Edit: Yes i used comics sans, sue me if you dare! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Let's speak about OST AT mine28 Nov 2018, 07:27 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Nov 2018, 07:14 AMthedarkarmadillo Usf isn't muni heavy? They have the same 60mu upgrade as Ost does.... But x2. I'm confused USF is muni heavy too, what i meant is, 60 muni for a single BAR upgrade, although they are expensive, they are (bare with me) ""AFFORDABLE"". That or consider that upgrade a really good investment. Maybe i expressed myself badly, my mistake. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW needs some nerfs don’t you think?28 Nov 2018, 07:09 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Nov 2018, 16:26 PMGrumpy I agree with you on both Volks and Obers. I'd also like to see the raketen get a wider firing arc and shorter aim time, possibly in exchange for making it stationary while cloaked. There are too many times that it seems like they should be firing at a vehicle and they don't. +1 RW needs some tweakings, stationary camo should have been implemented patches ago. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Let's speak about OST AT mine28 Nov 2018, 07:06 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Nov 2018, 12:16 PMTactical Imouto Daily reminder that we got Soviet demo nerfed because it wiped 250 MP squads for a little ammo price but its bad for ostheer mines to one shot kill 70FU 260? Light vehicles. And both had the same counterplay You just dont get tired of whining, dont you? You actually love to flame in these forums... To OP: https://www.coh2.org/topic/83749/insta-kill-mines https://www.coh2.org/topic/83161/teller-mines-and-ohks Read that first, this topic was already discussed Also, mineplay "is not that simple" as you picture, try OST first. Finally, OST is muni-intensive faction, mines are not "cheap" as you say, maybe for SU or USF 60 muni means nothing, but its not the same on every other faction. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why is usf at gun so bad?28 Nov 2018, 06:59 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Nov 2018, 19:29 PMblvckdream It´s not bad. /Thread. +1 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Inconsistencies in veterancy bonus26 Nov 2018, 05:46 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Nov 2018, 23:03 PMKatitof ... And how T34 vs P4 bonuses are similar? How SU-85 vs Panther bonuses are? I think vipper is not pointing out faction units veterancy is unbalanced or inconsistent but he used the panther/su85 example to show how some units come earlier in the game and have even less xp requirements and have even better vet bonus than others than came later. I do agree with OP that some vet bonuses are confusing with regards cost/benefit. And sometimes its not clear wether its consistent with a faction design or just the result of consecutive nerf/buffs without taking account the rest of the game. In: Lobby
Thread: Brit chess23 Nov 2018, 07:01 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Nov 2018, 03:11 AMPeenar Battalion I too miss when The British were a true thinking man's faction. hahahaha good one In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviets are OP23 Nov 2018, 06:58 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Nov 2018, 06:20 AMTheGentlemenTroll Penals are most definitely Mainline infantry So, conscript are? let me guess, they clean up the mess after the war ends, no wait, they bring water for the real mainline infantry in the frontlines. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviets are OP22 Nov 2018, 16:27 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Nov 2018, 10:30 AMVan Der Bolt I'd not say penals are overperforming. They are stronger than most mainlines, yes, but they cost 300MP, so they should be stronger. Also, PTRS gives them some power vs vehicles, but only vs LVs. They are bretty bad vs mediums and heavies. Penals are not mainline inf. Also no infantry deals easly against mediums nor heavies, i mean, if penals could, they would be OPAF. I dont understand why you bring that up. Plus, when they get PTRS they drop significantly at AI. AT satchel is hard to use vs carefully playing opponent. If u take T1, you need to fast rush to T3 to get some reliable AT, or backtech to T2 if your resourse control is not enough, or else you wouldn't be able to counter tanks well. Thats something useful, in order to scale up into midgame, AT is neccesary. Also you have gathered many penals squad by the time 2-3 of them have PTRS, so their AI hasn't decreased that much, even nothing at all. I'd say penals are not overperforming, but overused. That's mostly because using cons is much more difficult. I thought about making penals something like osttruppen, it may make soviet infantry play more variative. If OKM obers could be trained at T0 after 1 SWS is called in, it would be the same thing as penas right now. Expensive but effective. Man, they only cost 300, its only 20 more that USF riflemen and penals do wreak havok. Its a little overperform IMO. In: COH2 Balance