Profile of SuperHansFan

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 833

General Information


Thread: Winter balance mod 2020 V1.31 Apr 2020, 08:21 AM Jump back to quoted post1 Apr 2020, 03:06 AMShadowLinkX37 So let's recap on what cancer will still be in the game after the patch goes through with no more changes. Pack howitzers will still be braindead wipe guns. There's zero punishment for laying your mid and back lines with bunkers with excess resources even though only 2 (3 doctrinal) get no pop bunkers. Falls have basically no counter with brits except MAYBE commandos. Other than that you cannot fight them with an infantry unit. The KT is still a laughing stock. Panther vet is still outdated and has little to no meaning outside of its active abilities against super TDs. Its mobility means little when it can't hit the broad side of a barn while moving. G43 moving accuracy promotes blobbing and has little to no downsides. The jackson will still terrorize anything made of armor. Scotts still require 3 hits and have skill smoke. Skill tactician still untouched. I'm sure there's more I just can't think of it currently besides snipers OP. And please compare the brummbar to the 105 howitzer sherman bulldozer. Dozer sherman >>>> brummbar. Falls are OK now Faust is removed, their FG42 are locked behind flak gun like obers. And before Tommy nerfs Brits still had no infantry counter to vet 2 obers. But now Cromwell is better in AI so you can use tanks. I would like Bren drop rate standardized to a single mg drop rate. At the moment double weapon drops a lot more than a single MG34 for example. It's a death sentence if a couple brens get picked up by jaegers or obers and basically screws all infantry engagements. Axis only risk this if they get a squad wiped not put down to one man where the weapon drop kicks in with IS. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: T7029 Mar 2020, 10:55 AM Vet T70 is worth it's weight in gold late game Maybe it shouldn't be sniping a model every shot at vet, extra LoS is bonus enough for a vehicle in its role If you look at the nerfs to the Luch, the nerfs to the T70 were laughable in comparison. It's still just as lethal as it was once it's vet bonuses unlock In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Should soviet Combat E ngineers be buffed?29 Mar 2020, 03:30 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Mar 2020, 10:43 AMsuora But in practice pioneers aren't very combat effective because they take too much damage while closing in. Even combat engineers beat them if microed properly. CEs and pios are both subpar combat units nowhere near their infantry counterparts, but pios are not suicidal pushovers. Like Royal engineers with a bit of micro hiding behind sight blockers you can jump a mainline squad and win in cqb. Very useful early game. Not calling for crazy buffs, and obviously pios are not cqb specialists that can close in like pgrens can. All engies are in a pretty OK place. But I do feel they all drop a bit fast at vet 3, bar sturms that are beasts late game. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tiger main gun nerf too much? (Winter patch)28 Mar 2020, 15:52 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Mar 2020, 15:31 PMVipper Well do not blame me for your low IQ. And just to be clear it is Relic that classifies Tiger as Super heavy tank and not me. keep on trying. Lets agree with your terms here, for the sake of keeping discussion on the units in question. So what about with upcoming patch post-armor nerf IS-2 vs JP and FF vs KT? Both super heavies yes? Or do you want to call IS-2 super duper heavy in the event JP can compete here at a similar level to FF can with KT. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tiger main gun nerf too much? (Winter patch)28 Mar 2020, 15:34 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Mar 2020, 09:53 AMVipper That is is imply not true A JP firing at Churchill at max range will needs on average 63.5 sec to kill it. A FF firing at a Tiger at max range will needs on average 58.7 sec to kill it without even using Tulips. Note here that the price ratio greatly favors the FF. (calculation are made using DPS by adjusting damage and taking into account accuracy and penetration) You always mention tulips in these tests as if they're a garenteed addition to DPS, but they're not as it's a skill shot. I could also mention JP camo and even HEAT rounds that turn it into argubaly the best cost effective TD against all armor in the game. But I don't because they're not a sure thing in every engagement lile core DPS stats. Unfortunetly for you and imperial dane actually the JP is pretty darn good, it's just so many OKW players get a horn for panthers, command tigers or KT. So JP gets sidelinded when one parked at the back can more than carry its weight against heavies. (especially vs jacksons too which it handily beats 1vs1) And all this for 14 popcap In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tiger main gun nerf too much? (Winter patch)28 Mar 2020, 15:22 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Mar 2020, 09:53 AMVipper That is is imply not true A JP firing at Churchill at max range will needs on average 63.5 sec to kill it. A FF firing at a Tiger at max range will needs on average 58.7 sec to kill it without even using Tulips. Note here that the price ratio greatly favors the FF. (calculation are made using DPS by adjusting damage and taking into account accuracy and penetration) I did three tests with pershing vs JP at 50, 55 and 60 range. and tiger vs FF, JP came out on top every time. JP vs Churchill died first 2/3 times, I know these are token tests but if the JP couldn't fight with heavies then it wouldn't even be competeing with FF here. Of course SU-85 is different when it has no defensive vet like the JP and loses in a 1vs1 vs JP. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tiger main gun nerf too much? (Winter patch)28 Mar 2020, 15:17 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Mar 2020, 18:18 PMDomine Notice also how he conveniently left out that the Tiger is a doctrinal fuel heavy and the Churchill is a much much cheaper stock tank(and not even a heavy at that) According to vippers own definition in old threads calling for churchill nerfs the Churchill is a "heavy" and so is the tiger. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ditch the Sherman Dozer Attachment28 Mar 2020, 15:12 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Mar 2020, 20:04 PMVipper simply removed the thing. On top of everything else one cal upgrade his teammate's Shermans with it. Good, it promotes teamplay and players thinking up new commander compositions. Surely a good thing with how weak USF are in 4vs4 with their paper tanks compared to Sov or Brits In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Should soviet Combat E ngineers be buffed?28 Mar 2020, 09:56 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Mar 2020, 12:24 PMTaksin02 Rifles > Suicide range SMGs But pios can beat rifle squad cqb CE Rifles are still con rifles so you'll lose to volks every range In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tiger main gun nerf too much? (Winter patch)27 Mar 2020, 09:10 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Mar 2020, 17:06 PMJibberJabberJobber Panther was made in 1/40 Ostheer matches and 9/67 OKW matches in WCS. Schwerer was made in 75% of matches and in 73% of matches either T3 or T4 was made for Ostheer. Panther is obviously not a very popular choice in 1v1, even if short matches were excluded. Maybe the IS2 armor nerf + Ostheer tech improvement + Tiger AoE nerfs will change that, otherwise I think Panther could do with a small pen buff. It wouldn't change anything against mediums, but make it the defacto heavy counter for Axis, which Stug G and JP4 can't pull off. We'd have to see after the patch hits. This is more to do with tiger meta, panthers have always been built in past tournaments. Btw Jagdpanzer kills church or Pershing faster than a FF can kill a tiger. Let's drop this "JP can't counter heavies" myth In: COH2 Balance