Profile of SuperHansFan

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 833

General Information


Thread: Tiger nerf11 Apr 2020, 12:44 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Apr 2020, 12:39 PMMMX quite unlikely, since the vet 2 scatter bonus was removed and replaced by 30% faster turret rotation... unless, of course, that change somehow didn't make it into the final patch as advertised. I stand corrected, but still it feels a lot more lethal at vet. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tiger nerf11 Apr 2020, 12:29 PM A bugged OP unit gets fixed and less than 24hrs after the patch we have crying threads. it's still as lethal as ever vs inf once you get the scatter bonus at vet 2. And it's not like a vet 2 tiger is hard to obtain. Tightrope himself has proven this in tests, it's not quite as good as IS-2 or KT but it fires faster. thankfully tiger is not the wipe machine at vet0 it was before. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Are the patches making this game progressively worse?11 Apr 2020, 12:19 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Apr 2020, 11:41 AMskemshead This is the problem. Too may people seem to think that contribution equals quality and therefore criticism is unwarranted. I don't think anyone knows who is really making the final decision on any patch and what limitations are placed on those working on the patch. However imo the direction patches have taken over the last few years have done very little to improve the game overall from an enjoyment perspective. Is it more balance across all modes, probably, but frustration when playing any faction is through the roof because every faction is jamb packed with cancer... And before the usual retards rush in with rank references and l2p quips, let me just say I know how to play, I just dislike how the game has evolved. Hell I won't even watch a stream anymore unless its someone like vonivan or someone that is entertaining because the game has just become cheesey boring crap. they are balancing better than the relic sledgehammer approach. Relics old answer to an OP unit was to nerf it in five different ways eg comet. The game will take time to balance after so many years of up and down powerspikes and bizare design decisions (OKW vet 5, old brits having crappy vet but strong out gate, USF tech limitations. Right now we have the balance tema doing a great job AND adding new content in the form of commander redesigns keeping the game alive. In sanders own words they are taking things slow, I know people will point to the tiger last patch but that was actually bugged. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Are the patches making this game progressively worse?11 Apr 2020, 09:08 AM The balance team are doing a good job So you wish last patch never happened? Imagine if brits were left UP and the game was never patched again In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Brit buffs are definitely a start, but will not be enough10 Apr 2020, 07:29 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Apr 2020, 04:29 AMLoopDloop Ah yes lets make an at gun like 13 manpower more to reinforce but also really tough for no reason. The real question is why would you call in a commander glider for an exactly identical MG team you have at tier 0. This isn't USF airborne where you are split by tech. Really the inclusion of a Vickers is strange here, especially at the timing it arrives and how dependent Vickers is on vet to suppress anything by mid game. Commando ATG and mortar would give some diversity, especially if they had different abilities. Obviously costs can be set accordingly. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Poll: USF TD suggestion10 Apr 2020, 07:09 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Apr 2020, 07:00 AMSkysTheLimit It was judged that way because it was their only stock AT vehicle... This thread is literally about changing that M10 is perfectly suited for flanking and killing a JP4. JP4 is specifically meant to counter the Jackson anyway USF might as well be deleted from 4vs4 if their only AT will be m10s and 57mms. There is just no viable way to flank a wall of panthers and JPs in team games, especially maps like redball or hamburg Jackson is the glue that keeps their late game playable. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Poll: USF TD suggestion10 Apr 2020, 05:36 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Apr 2020, 03:33 AMCODGUY I don't understand the continued crying ahout this unit...oh wait I do. The OKW mains bitched and moaned to get it's armor nerfed and the balance team caved so now there is going to even more bitching and moaning until its just an expenisve M10. Because allied TDs can somewhat stand up to axis uber tanks. Obviously this calls for entire roster redesigns, HP and DPS reductions until they're thrown in the old comet trashcan. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Poll: USF TD suggestion10 Apr 2020, 05:28 AM Jackson will be weaker next patch with P4 target size reduction, armor and fuel nerf. 480 health was tried and judged a bad idea as they are just deleted at ease in team games. Jackson should be able to fight a jagdpanzer, lower DPS or HP just ruins that match up. Honestly I think the unit is fine, it just needed a minor turret rotation and acceleration nerf. That would make it more historically accurate too. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What's wrong with UKF?10 Apr 2020, 05:20 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Apr 2020, 03:24 AMdistrofio This premise is false to begin with. Or at least incomplete PD: Bolster says Hi. By unit pool he means selection of different units. This is especially noticeable with infantry/team weapons. E.g they don't have a mortar in their unit pool because an emplacement was supposed to do that job. Bolster is not a unit. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Brit buffs are definitely a start, but will not be enough10 Apr 2020, 04:28 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Apr 2020, 04:22 AMSupport Sapper And patch come live without any further adjustments for ukf despite alll feedback since 1.3 is kind of disappointing. Especially Nothing was did to Hq glider, so now we can produce 2 stock unit at 3 cp. Glider should give commando crewed version of support weapons, ATG could have camo toggle and MG could be replaced with commando mortar team. Then the ability would be good In: COH2 Balance