Profile of Mr Carmine

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1289

General Information


Thread: New Commander Update Patch June 14th15 Jun 2019, 09:42 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Jun 2019, 08:44 AMVipper That sound about right (maybe they should lose the sandbags if upgraded with PPsh/SVT/PTRS) That would be worth looking at. If volks sections loose their own sandbags ofcourse. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: New Commander Update Patch June 14th15 Jun 2019, 08:42 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Jun 2019, 08:24 AMVipper Panzerfusilliers "The way Panzerfusiliers are deployed has been changed to better match their role as an alternative mainline infantry to Volksgrenadiers. They will be slightly weaker than Volksgrenadiers at the start but have access to the Anti-Tank Rifle Grenades, slightly better combat veterancy, and more powerful upgrades, giving them increased power in the late game. This should make for interesting choices and compositions." PF miss 2 thing that VG have access to sandbags (imo should be removed from all mainline infatry or have speed decrease) The ability scavenger If the role is mainline infatry one should consider adding this options Imo only cons should have sandbags because they are supposed to be the supporting mainline inf. And they lack nondoc upgrades and potent nades. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: New Commander Update Patch June 14th15 Jun 2019, 06:53 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Jun 2019, 23:04 PMWiderstreit They have a better shoot frequenz than Schrecks. Schreck is stronger, that is the deal. Every tank can still outrange them, use T34/76 OP maingun and simply one or two shot the PnzGren. (had that today in 2 games). Lol thats just nad rng mate. And 2 games dont show a problem. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What is people obsession with panthers?14 Jun 2019, 06:40 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Jun 2019, 20:15 PMachpawel This is really good I laughed my head off Super stuff But seriously - I feel panther is ok - it should get some more AI capability (not like HE sherman or other infantry killers), just like I wrote, similar AI performance to a light vehicle. It's just crazy to see players use an expensive and requiring a lot of tech tank as a ram instead of relaying on MGs. It should be a solid anti tank tank but unlike tank destroyers have less range (which it has) with some anty inf capabilities. I don't thing ppl want a tank that auto wins but compared to a some allied TDs and other tanks it just feels strange to use it as neither a TD nor AI - sort of TD with shorter range than other TDs and almost zero AI capability. Like a lot of HP with that can die really quickly when snared. The current allied td preformance stems purely from the fact that the kt is non doc and not limited to one per game. The fact the panthers just bounced off td round after td round at that time did not help either. Now because of the td buff panther and kt feel up. Because they cant own like they used to. In: Lobby
Thread: Panther armor rebalance.14 Jun 2019, 06:32 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Jun 2019, 22:34 PMthedarkarmadillo That would simply make it too attractive of an option and would outshine other units. It would ruin team games (again) because all you would need is panthers Reducing the front armour does nothing against its intended counters while making it weaker against other units. Premium mediums would have an easier time brawling with the panther in exchange for being more durable when flanked? Allied TDs need toning down. Don't adjust a functioning unit due to an overperforming one The king tiger with 375 armour and 1280 hitpoints being non doctrinal is the cause of the current allied td's. And like the panther the kingtiger was fielded nearly every game. While allies already struggled to deal with panthers at the time. Allies did little more the scratch the paint jobs at that time. So if we tone the allies td's down (wich i am not against) how do the allies fight the non doc kt? Do we make it one per game? So if allies need to sacrifice about half their army just to kill it okw doesnt have a new one a click away. This goes esp in team games. Do we make the kt doctinal? Do we buff doctrinal heavy arty again? Just curious because few people seem to think about what would happen if allied td's get toned down, esp to pre buff levels. They dont say by how much and what the should be able to counter. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What is people obsession with panthers?13 Jun 2019, 18:19 PM It a expensive tank both for ost and okw at the end of the tech tiers. And ost t4 according to some is a premium tier. Hence the logic the panther should be the pinnacle of tanks. But total tech cost of other factions doesnt support that to my knowlidge. Its already a beast. It just doesnt get to bounce at round from td,s and field guns as much anymore. For some reason that means its up. Not that it can take a beating, dive in/get away real quick and can pen almost anything. In: Lobby
Thread: SOV: Move T-34/76 to T3 and make T-34/85 non-doc/T413 Jun 2019, 11:51 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Jun 2019, 17:06 PMWiderstreit Because with the current mechanism it is too easy to counter AT infantry. The tank simply insta kills the closest infantry. Such a mechanism is broken. The thread is about making T34/76 arrive earlier, if, then its AI has to be nerfed. Because at the moment T34 is too effective, if it arrives that early. That is what I speak about. Just to be clear. I dont want to make it come earlier. Its fine where it is. Its in the best spot it has ever been and there is no need for buff or nerfs. The t34 vet bonuses give it mobility over durability. And ofcourse the roff vet buff for the main gun is nothing to be scoffed at. But before the hull mg buff the t34 vetted realy slow if at all. It often got destroyed before or at vet1. Now it regurarly gets to vet 2 and sometimes vet 3. To me it was mindboggeling that the t34 sucked at everthing but being cheap. And being cheap is no excuse at sucking at everthing. Because of that (imo small) buff to its ai, its not a total waste of fuel anymore. Or just the single most expensive snare in the game. I just dont think anything is needed for both the t34's. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: SOV: Move T-34/76 to T3 and make T-34/85 non-doc/T412 Jun 2019, 09:28 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Jun 2019, 08:46 AMWiderstreit Maybe you even don't know the bug? It shoots without animation. Next, and it is OP too. Please explain why you think it is. The t34 76 sucks in the at department. It suck in armour and hp departmet. It does not excel in flanking. It does excel in the cost department. It also does do well in the ai department in large part because of the hull mg. But a p4 is still better in ai imo. This is also why they buffed it to begin with. The t34 was only good at was being cheap and die to a sneese a thus free exp for axis. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Panther armor rebalance.12 Jun 2019, 09:12 AM The panther is not only fast, it has high hp, heavy crush, pretty decent armour wich benefits from vet bonusses, high pen to deal with heavy armour quite nicely. It can stay out of harms way quite easely. It can chase realy easely by crushing almost anything. Its only real downside its rear armour and its cost. It still bounces shots frontaly quite reguraly, just not from td,s designed to fight it. And 0.5 moving acc is not a weakness. It was not designed to be the fastest mobile tankhunter with suberb accuracy while also being the tankiest one of the bunch with decent ai power. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panther armor rebalance.12 Jun 2019, 07:35 AM But the panther already 1 ups every non doc medium tank. The only way that non doc mediums beat it if the axis player is outflanked. it hits a mine/is snared. Or allies get enough tanks to swarm it. In: COH2 Balance