Profile of gbem

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1979

General Information


Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback6 Jan 2021, 17:27 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Jan 2021, 17:24 PMthekingsown10 No tank destroyer should be able to self spot though, its just bad design . It would go a long way in balancing the TD meta . and neither should it be possible to put spotting scopes on an elefant... but here we are... in any case if you really cant deal with the SU-85 im afraid thats on you... a single pak 40 already prevents it from destroying ur armor... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback6 Jan 2021, 17:21 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Jan 2021, 05:38 AMmrgame2 who say i cant? that is besides a pakwall + panther cost tons more. and pak are getting nerfs against rushing sov infantry! im saying su85 is way too cost effective. 60TD are just too dominant in 2v2. su85 30% to 20% vet nerf is the bare minimum. then they had to deduct brumbar armor for no reasons, while free passes to KV and Churchills and BD Shermans! a pak wall + panther? yeah... but 1 pak 40 alone can push off the SU-85 already... thats much cheaper than an SU-85 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback6 Jan 2021, 05:32 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Jan 2021, 05:25 AMmrgame2 su85 is a problem in 2v2, especially laney maps. su85 is dirt cheap for this performance and vet abilities. while it is fixed turret, it is fast to hunt down retreating tanks! while i accept brumbar nerf to its bunker buster, taking another 10 from armor is too much. basically this tip about 60TD! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jChxhrws9S8 if you cant beat the SU-85 with a pakwall + panther then im afraid thats on you... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback6 Jan 2021, 05:27 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Jan 2021, 05:22 AMmrgame2 4v4 is all about fun. nerfing those heavies for 4v4 will make them useless in 2v2. besides countering those heavies in 4v4 is nothing special. soo keeping heavies OP in 4v4 is fun.... and nerfing their counters hard is even more fun... take your fun and shove it some place else... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback6 Jan 2021, 05:18 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Jan 2021, 05:16 AMLetzte Bataillon It lost 10 range on its AI shells, a capability the others in its class never had in the first place. well the point is the JT/ELE/ISU are all cancerous units in 4v4 teamgames... and id rather see all 3 of them nerfed especially when considering that its counters just got some nerfs... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback6 Jan 2021, 05:12 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Jan 2021, 04:28 AMmrgame2 su85 brought in line, the SU-85 was never a problem... in fact the JT/ELE/ISU were all much bigger fishes to fry for teamgames... but only the ISU got nerfed for some reason In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback6 Jan 2021, 04:57 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Jan 2021, 04:49 AMmrgame2 otherwise teching is close enough, and hard to pin down after you account for reinforcement, bigger squad sizes. no not really... reinforcement costs are almost always half the cost of the squad... model per model comparison is really irrelevant when you consider that infantry are balanced per squad not per model... squads with lower model count tend to have lower RA and higher DPS... the same is true vice versa... Jump back to quoted post6 Jan 2021, 04:49 AMmrgame2 doctrine calls in, the soviets have some of the best callins true... but again core armies must be balanced against each other... a faction should not be reliant on doctrines for viability Jump back to quoted post6 Jan 2021, 04:49 AMmrgame2 sov are pretty much king of late games dig-in. mostly thanks to 7 man zis3 su-85 and ram+offmaps... and all of them got nerfs In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback6 Jan 2021, 04:40 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Jan 2021, 04:36 AMmrgame2 Makes sense. I dont see why others are trying to disagree? Sov got the real wholesome buffs overall. The only loss is T70 gets a little unattractive. What more do they want? this is SOV`s tech costs as of patch V5 https://www.coh2.org/topic/107284/soviet-teching-comparison they still tech worse than ostheer In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback6 Jan 2021, 04:31 AM with the death loop semi fixed i think its a decent idea to consider making the maxim a NORMAL 4 man MG... the faction is in dire need of nondoc suppression options and the M5 quad isnt good enough (yet) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback5 Jan 2021, 20:38 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 20:32 PMVipper snip* why are you ignoring my post vipper? afraid that your unfounded claims would be disproven? In: COH2 Balance