Profile of gbem

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1979

General Information


Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OKW Feedback30 Dec 2020, 02:34 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Dec 2020, 14:27 PMOlfin From what u said , your problem is with the Soviet tech and the T70 , not with P2 being better in killing garrisoned infantry , so I advice u to post your thoughts in Soviet thread not here. or just reverting this dumb buff... the luchs itself was fine before the retarded shooting through cover buff... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback30 Dec 2020, 02:32 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Dec 2020, 21:21 PMblvckdream Only really applies to Ostheer as they can just cheese Soviets endlessly in the early game. It's more fun/playable against OKW. Unfortunately, I don't see how the new patch changes this. the new patch makes it worse... now we have luchs shooting through cover and defeating infantry better than the significantly more expensive (tech costs) T-70... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OKW Feedback29 Dec 2020, 13:42 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Dec 2020, 20:57 PMelchino7 What's the timing and resources invested to get one compared to the other? I'm all in to make T70 equal to the P2, if that means that T3 arrives at the same time as other factions light vehicles. Which would make the Su76 actually good at countering other light vehicles in the same fashion as the AEC/Stuart/Puma before you get too much bleed. Edit: added cost for comparison. You need to discount the -10f and -20f respectively. To make it complete i also added the initial mp + starting unit mp value. its 50 for sov afaik OKW to mech HQ = 15 + 45 (truck and hq) SOV to T3 = 10 + 15 + 85 (t1/2 nade and T3) 50 fuel difference as of V4... 60 fuel as of live... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OKW Feedback29 Dec 2020, 13:32 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Dec 2020, 19:16 PMOlfin Then , if we follow your logic , lets make T34-85 cost more than P4 ausf because it out perform it and cheaper, the T-34-85 does not outperform the P4J... its more reliable since it reliably tanks an additional shot through hp as opposed to armor... but the P4J shoots faster and is better vs infantry also im all in for the T-34-85 to cost 140 fuel... just make it available nondoctrinally at T4... Jump back to quoted post28 Dec 2020, 19:16 PMOlfin and lets remove the ability to cap from T70 and reduce its ability to fight vehicles and make it better against infantry in cover and reduce its cost or maybe just make it another copy of Panzer2 but with other skin. sure... then reduce the T-70s cost to 60 and reduce T3 cost to 40 fuel... then lock 7 man behind T3 instead of mobilize reserves... Jump back to quoted post28 Dec 2020, 19:39 PMOlfin 30 fuel is alot actually. yes and the soviets have to pay alot more than 30 fuel due to retarded sidetechs... which have been only band aided as opposed to addressed entirely Jump back to quoted post28 Dec 2020, 19:42 PMOlfin Not true - they are intended to fight infantry and other light armors such as luchs and 222. do you know what saturation means or does that king tiger profile picture of yours cloud your thinking? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OKW Feedback28 Dec 2020, 18:30 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Dec 2020, 18:13 PMSander93 The Luchs is still considerably worse while chasing or when firing from the other side of heavy cover. Or against vehicles. It's faster. And all this for a mere 10 more fuel. yes the luchs is 10 fuel (14.3%) cheaper than the T-70 while being quite superior against infantry in open (nonclustered) or against heavy cover (post T-70 nerf) in exchange for being worse vs vehicles... but then the T-34 is 30 fuel (25%) cheaper than the P4 but is inferior to the P4 against armor and infantry... but yeah the T-34 is soo OP we need to nerf it!... and then you also have to consider that light armor is mostly intended to fight infantry... having a light armor generalist isnt gonna do you good since armor saturation begins in the medium tank phase/lategame.... having the T-70 perform worse than the luchs vs infantry is nonsense In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OKW Feedback28 Dec 2020, 18:11 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Dec 2020, 18:10 PMVipper Luch and T-70 use different mechanisms. T-70 use AOE while luch accuracy. it should not be outperforming the T-70 period... the T-70 costs more and already got a hefty nerf In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OKW Feedback28 Dec 2020, 17:55 PM have you folks noticed that the new luchs deletes infantry in cover faster than a T-70? might wanna consider tuning (or reverting) those changes... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback28 Dec 2020, 17:21 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Dec 2020, 17:16 PMPip How'd Penals do from the same position? Differing elevation has a severe impact on tank combat. they win if they main gun crit the P4... they lose if they dont... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback28 Dec 2020, 17:11 PM 2 zook RE vs p4 pgrens fared even better... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback28 Dec 2020, 16:19 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Dec 2020, 15:52 PMSander93 I suggest you go and see what happens when a 3x PTRS Penal squad behind heavy cover goes up against a P4. Spoilers: https://youtu.be/P_G_TbdbGHs?t=757 this actually proves PTRS penals still suck... 1x zook on an RE in green can take on a P4 pretty good... so can 1x schreck vs a T-34 in good cover In: COH2 Balance