Profile of gbem

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1979

General Information


Thread: Will they address Panzergrens in the new patch?5 Jan 2021, 11:03 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 04:48 AMporkloin m-42, good but doctrinal Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 04:48 AMporkloin Guards,trade conscripts for penals not a substitute for an AT gun Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 04:48 AMporkloin Please remember that OST vehicles and buildings aren't free if you're going to try and add costs to the soviets. SOV teching costs even more than ost teching... adding buildings into the equation hurts your argument even further... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Will they address Panzergrens in the new patch?5 Jan 2021, 11:01 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 06:25 AMmongman well seeing how Soviet buildings are getting a cost reduction in v5 it seems any argument here is null and void there is no cost reduction... T3 is made cheaper in exchange for T4 having a price hike... overall costs remain the same.... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback5 Jan 2021, 08:03 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 07:41 AMVipper Soviet Tech does not need further discount. T1 already give access to sacthels/AT sacthels/PTRS with no additional cost. Soviet tech does not really need more discounts. In addition that would make commander that provide doctrinal support weapons less attractive. The problem lies in the design not the balance. soviet tech is still unnecessarily expensive... molotov/AT sidegrade does not deserve to exist... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Will they address Panzergrens in the new patch?5 Jan 2021, 04:34 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 02:52 AMporkloin 1x T1 (160/10) 1x Clown car (190/15) 4x conscripts (240) 1310 manpower 25 fuel -OR- 1x T1 1x Sniper 3x conscripts 1,240 manpower 10 fuel VS _________________________ 1x MG 1x T1 2x Gren 1x BP1 1x Pgren 1260 manpower 50 fuel In both cases you're looking at 5x mobile squads vs 4x mobile squads and a crew weapon. I was even charitable to your argument and went with full conscripts over a 2nd CE. Soviets will field their army faster unless OST is allowed all the fuel they want. Are you guys just letting OST cap the whole map, and that's why you think they're OP? incorrect since the soviets have retarded sidetech costs +150/15 mp/fuel +200 for medics for ost they cost +150/60 mp/munitions for medics youre also ignoring the fact that the soviets NEED to build T2 for the AT gun if they go T1... thats another 160/15 to the pricetag.... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback4 Jan 2021, 21:43 PM now that you are looking at soviet tech consider reducing the manpower cost for soviet teching... a quick look at the insane MP cost should point you to the right direction In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Will they address Panzergrens in the new patch?4 Jan 2021, 19:40 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Jan 2021, 19:36 PMporkloin Only one of these statements can be true: A) Pgrens are extremely hard for soviets to deal with and imbalance the match-up B) The soviet counters to Pgrens are not worth building fixed it for ya A) Pgrens are extremely hard for soviets to deal with and imbalance the match-up B) the soviet`s INTENDED counter to pgrens are extremely cost inefficient and therefore not worth building no longer mutually exclusive... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Will they address Panzergrens in the new patch?4 Jan 2021, 19:10 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Jan 2021, 18:56 PMporkloin Did you know that Pgrens, which are the topic of discussion, aren't in SOV T1? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Will they address Panzergrens in the new patch?4 Jan 2021, 18:49 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Jan 2021, 18:40 PMporkloin FFS it says right there "Pgrens primarily". At no point is t1 or anything other than Pgrens implied. Can people just not own up to things? SOV doesn't struggle against Pgrens primarily 1) have the sniper and clown car, and 2) can easily control the map through greater numbers you do know that sniper and clown car is in SOV T1 right? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Will they address Panzergrens in the new patch?4 Jan 2021, 18:24 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Jan 2021, 18:23 PMElaindil But then you have to account for OKW vs UKF and USF... This is a slippery slope and too big of a task. OKW struggles hard vs UKF/USF... id say making OKW teching a bit less dumb is the best solution to the problem... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Will they address Panzergrens in the new patch?4 Jan 2021, 18:22 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Jan 2021, 18:17 PMElaindil When you put it like that it seems that adjusting soviet teching costs may be a solution to the problem of early PGs but then you have to think about OKW match-up and it all gets complicated again the solution is to adjust both OKW and SOV teching costs... SOV teching costs the most MP while OKW costs the most fuel... adjusting both then removing those pointless sidetechs for sov would make both factions alot better... In: COH2 Balance