Profile of gbem

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1979

General Information


Thread: Will they address Panzergrens in the new patch?5 Jan 2021, 20:02 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 19:45 PMporkloin Ahh yes Pgrens intended counter the AEC or Stuart. do you play the game? cuz T-70/aec/stuart/flaktruck all fare alot better vs pgrens than infantry does... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Will they address Panzergrens in the new patch?5 Jan 2021, 19:05 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 18:57 PMThamor Wrong again, UKF beats grens easily almost any range and even more when they are 5 man squad. yes and i did mention sections beating grens at long range now did i? Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 12:05 PMgbem grens dont even need to put sandbags... unlike conscripts they dont need to close the distance vs the opponent... (unless its sections) Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 18:57 PMThamor Rifles & Conscripts aren't usually forced to stay on long range fight and they shouldn't either do that unless there is some flanking maneuver going on. rifles yes because they have really really good close range DPS and can frontally change any axis mainline and still trade positively... conscripts on the other hand can charge grens frontally for a 50/50 chance of winning and cannot charge vs volks at all... or they can stay in sandbags that they built and either force grens/volks to find nearby green cover to shoot at conscripts with or to retreat idk about you but id say the latter is a bit more ideal... Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 18:57 PMThamor This started anyway with grens not needing cover which is still very wrong thing to say. that wasnt the point... the point isnt "grens dont need cover"... the point is "grens dont need to be able to build cover"... the fact that they can force enemy infantry to come closer to them and fight outside of cover is already a massive advantage on its own... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Will they address Panzergrens in the new patch?5 Jan 2021, 18:47 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 18:40 PMporkloin If you really want to go t2 against pgrens make a sacrifice and build maxims. now i know you dont play the soviets... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback5 Jan 2021, 18:29 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 18:21 PMVipper That are not the only change, look 1220 for the changes. Changes include faster T1, lower cost and better healing, faster T3 with, better Mobilize reserves that is available 40 fuel earlier from t3... Soviet tech is stronger not weaker in the preview The only point I have made is that Soviet tect does not need to become cheaper as some users have suggested. Check post 1183 this is a comparison of soviet teching costs as of V5 https://www.coh2.org/topic/107284/soviet-teching-comparison everything youve said amounts to little since SOV STILL pays more regardless of the changes... stop denying facts vipper In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Will they address Panzergrens in the new patch?5 Jan 2021, 18:08 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 18:03 PMporkloin Right. So ZiS is completely irrelevant to pgren timing, and you only mentioned it because you were pathetically grasping for anything to buttress your broken argument about costs. it is relevant to your retarded point of building sniper/M3/T1 to counter pgrens... maybe if youve never derailed the pgren discussion with your halfarsed "ideas" for a counter we could steer the discussion back to pgrens appropriately as opposed to discussing how retarded soviet teching is... in any case as ive said before pgrens come much earlier than their intended counter (allied LVs) and the influence they exert as an earlygame NONDOCTRINAL elite seems quite insane... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Will they address Panzergrens in the new patch?5 Jan 2021, 17:56 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 17:49 PMporkloin The part in question. You're claiming SOVs need T2 for AT. Why do SOVs need AT if OST doesn't have to build any buildings capable of armor? You absolutely need a field gun for the terrifying armored monstrosity that is the 250? because the zis gun is integral to soviet lategame play... 1. barrage can disloge team weapons and control blobs... 2. as with all facs AT guns are required to repel medium armor... AT infantry will not suffice unless you are some 4v4 player... AT walls are very much meta is any gamemode for a good reason... maybe you would actually be aware of these if you actually played the soviets... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Will they address Panzergrens in the new patch?5 Jan 2021, 17:39 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 17:25 PMporkloin SOV tech costs suck therefore OST tech is free? Could you be anymore dishonest? and youre missing the point... OST buildings arent free yes... but SOV buildings are even more expensive than OST buildings soo adding teching costs does NOT support your point... the only one being dishonest here is a biased porkloin... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet teching comparison5 Jan 2021, 16:19 PM OST vs SOV teching comparison as of patch V5 mp cost fuel cost SOV teching costs no tier skip 160+160+200+280 = 800 10+15+75+100 = 200 OST teching costs no tier skip 80+100+100+200+140+100+100 = 820 50+20+105+40 = 205 SOV teching cost to T4 + sidetech and mobilize reserves (cuz LV skip) T1 skip 160+200+280+150+200= 990(1090 with mobilize reserves) 15+15+75+100 = 205(225 with mobilize reserves) OST teching cost to T3 with medics 150+80+100+100+200+140 = 770 50+105+20 = 175 OST teching cost to T4 with medics 150+80+100+100+200+140+100+100 = 970 50+20+105+40 = 205 SOV teching cost with T-70 + molly/AT + medics T1 skip 160+200+260+280+150+200 = 1250 15+15+75+70+100 = 275 OST teching cost to T4 with 222 and medics 150+80+100+200+100+200+140+100+100 = 1170 50+20+30+105+40 = 245 SOV teching cost to first T-34 + molly/at + medics T1 skip 160+200+280+150+200+300=1290(1390 with mobilize reserves since LV skip) 15+75+100+90+15 = 295(305 with mobilize reserves since LV skip) OST teching cost to first P4 + medics 150+80+100+100+200+140+350 = 1120 50+20+105+120 = 295 its clear that soviet teching alone without side techs already equals ostheer teching costs... soviet sidetechs only increase the teching costs of an already expensive teching system.... judging by the performance of SOV`s earlygame i see no reason for SOV`s teching to be more expensive than ost`s teching... lastly the T-34 comes ridiculously late as a medium tank due to SOV teching... its timing needs to be adjusted... suggestion: 1. make mobilize reserves free with T3 (youve nerfed the T-70 anyways) or 2. split T4 with armor authorization... base T4 grants the T-34 alone + armor authorization unlocks SU-85 katy and doctrinal soviet units... or 3. make T4 require mobilize reserves + reduce T4 cost by 100/20... or a combination of the above suggestions... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback5 Jan 2021, 15:46 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 15:27 PMVipper You have started projecting your own flaws on to other. SOV teching costs without side techs 15+75+100 = 190 OST teching costs without T2 50+105+40 = 195 SOV teching cost to T4 + sidetech and mobilize reserves (cuz LV skip) 15+15+75+20+100 = 225 OST teching cost to T3 50+105+20 = 175 OST teching cost to T4 50+20+105+40 = 205 SOV teching cost with T-70 + molly/AT 15+15+75+70+100 = 275 OST teching cost to T4 with 222/flametruck 50+20+30+105+40 = 245 SOV teching cost to first T-34 15+75+100+90+15 = 295(305 with mobilize reserves since LV skip) OST teching cost to first P4 50+20+105+120 = 295 and thats just fuel... dont get me started on manpower... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback5 Jan 2021, 14:56 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 14:17 PMVipper The what I have said and will say it again is there is little to justify even lower tech cost for soviet, unless you come up with argument why in your opinion Soviet should pay even less for tech I suggest you move on. SOV pays more for tech than ost does... stop being delusional... In: COH2 Balance