Profile of Smiling Tiger

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 207

General Information


Thread: OKW (balance preview mode) - concerns and solutions14 Jun 2016, 02:32 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Jun 2016, 02:31 AMSmiling Tiger Whoops double post In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW (balance preview mode) - concerns and solutions14 Jun 2016, 02:31 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Jun 2016, 01:02 AMZyllen last part is false you really need to be knuckle head to lose a medium tank to a single puma. 2 will do the job but the jp 4 and p4 does it way better for cost. and as you say its similar priced to other lv's. then compare the puma to the 222 and the aec who can counter vehicles that are more expensive then they themselves are I agree the jp4 and the p4 are better counters to mediums than the puma but the puma can still kill tanks. I dont have the replays but I assure you ive killed plenty of mediums with a single puma and not 2. As for the other light vehicles countering vehicles that are more expensive that is precisely my point, a 222 can kill a t70 if it catches it on the flank but it cant kill a medium like a puma can and an aec and stuart can stun mediums but they cant finish them off like the puma which also can jam turrets. However I will agree that the AAHT needs reworking and a price decrease because it is very risky for such a high price and clunky performance. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panzer commander vs Tank commander13 Jun 2016, 23:18 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Jun 2016, 20:45 PMButcher The problem lies with the whole OKW Elite Armor doctrine imo. The tank Commanders artillery should come down faster. Never ever have I seen this not being dodged. The HEAT shells should be a passive ability with a smaller effect similar to the Coh1 AP shells from the tank hunter doctrine. And crew repairs are a worse equivalent to the Soviet crew repairs. I lack ideas here though. I just go for it because of the Trolltiger. +1 these are good ideas, I also go for the elite armor doctrine solely for the armor tracking and the Sturmtiger. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW (balance preview mode) - concerns and solutions13 Jun 2016, 15:15 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Jun 2016, 12:21 PMZyllen yeah it is a light tank destroyer. And that makes the puma way to expensive for what it is doing. but maths and logic is not your strong point. Having decent micro still doesnt make this unit good . its just makes them acceptable How is the puma overpriced for its role when it can easily destroy similar priced light vehicles and it can destroy medium armor with good micro and ambush tactics. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW (balance preview mode) - concerns and solutions11 Jun 2016, 16:19 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Jun 2016, 16:11 PMPencilBatRation No, please cut that crap already. The problems with OKW AT are: - The puma is easily penetrated by rifles. - The puppchen has a high tendency to hit ground and is unresponsive. +1 and dont forget that the puppchen dies to anything in seconds. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW (balance preview mode) - concerns and solutions11 Jun 2016, 03:06 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Jun 2016, 01:28 AMFiresparks Light vehicles are a standard part of all faction's build. 222, stuart, t70, and the aec/bofor are all important step before the player get their medium tank. The okw shouldn't be an exception, and they have two great light vehicle. the main problem is really how the OKW have to chose between healing or going into the light vehicle phase. The idea behind buffing the AAHT is to give the OKW a third choice of light vehicle, and to allow them to get healing and not gimped out on their light vehicle. +1000 This is the biggest problem with the OKW. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW base flaks9 Jun 2016, 16:32 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Jun 2016, 13:23 PMMonkey_Man american and soviet 50.cal base emplacement pen my 222. Relic plz nerf Since when is the 222 a tank? Last time I checked it was a scout car and a really good one. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: I don't get why Brits are still receiving buffs7 Jun 2016, 17:40 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Jun 2016, 16:36 PMausterlitz Completely ignored the fact that comet can wipe infantry..panther can maybe kill a single model with difficulty in 10 seconds.The panther gun is dud.And allied TD pen increase only make its armor advantage less relevant. I wouldn't call the panthers gun a dud but it sure doesn't do much to infantry but yeah the comet definitely wrecks infantry really hard to the point where I dont think either of these tanks costs reflect their performance. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW (balance preview mode) - concerns and solutions7 Jun 2016, 12:55 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Jun 2016, 12:36 PMAustralian Magic Personally I love to go for 251/17. It's not about the suppression. It's abot how deadly it can be. When used right, it has easily achieve 20-50kills. My personal best was 68 against double maxims spammers. Tho it require huge micro input. Could you maybe post a replay? Ive been wanting to use this unit for awhile but I never seem to get it to work right when I build it. Im not quite sure this unit needs much changing I really just think it needs a price reduction (and the 222 needs a price increase). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: I don't get why Brits are still receiving buffs7 Jun 2016, 12:48 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Jun 2016, 12:08 PMRedT3rror Comets lose against Panthers. Comets do not always lose against panthers because of their rate of fire, turn rate and accuracy on the move even though they are a more generalist tank. In: COH2 Balance