Profile of Smiling Tiger

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 207

General Information


Thread: Hummel in - Hetzer out!20 Mar 2016, 17:18 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Mar 2016, 16:02 PMMissCommissar Regular Hetzer will be 100% copy of Jagdpanzer, so what for you need it actually? Better then add there some other unit. Maybe place there Marder III as cheap version of Jagdpanzer - same power, but less HP and armor? Or, since it's feuersturm doctrine, add there Luchs 2 with flamer gun, there was such modification actually. Of course, for lesser CP. I think the regular Hetzer would be a better idea because the marder 3 has no machine gun so it could not engage infantry but the hetzer does so it could be used as a light assault gun as well as a tank destroyer unlike the marder 3 and jadgpanzer which are useless against infantry and the hetzer would have better armor than the marder 3 but not as good as the jadgpanzer 4 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Hummel in - Hetzer out!20 Mar 2016, 15:49 PM I really like the idea of adding the hummel but I think they should remove the recoup losses ability instead and change the flammhetzer to a regular hetzer rather than simply removing the flammhetzer. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sturmpioneers - Uberpioneers18 Mar 2016, 14:04 PM Sturmpioneers are fine as they are and if you nerf them than the OKW will be even more dependent on volkgrenadiers which is already a problem because if you are not using a doctrine with another type of infantry they are by far the best option because of how much Obers under preform because of the various nerfs and the fact that they come out so late that they have extreme difficulty vetting because they have to fight vet 2 or 3 allied infantry squads with upgrades while they themselves have no veterency. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW needs a rework17 Mar 2016, 16:22 PM I like the idea of replacing the panzerschrek with a panzerfaust but if thats going to happen then either the Raketenwerfer needs severe buffs or the OKW needs something added to deal with vehicles early to mid game because the puma is good but it has very little armor and it can not deal with medium tanks without tons of micro and if you go for a puma you will delay your own tanks by building the middle half track and building a puma so you will have to deal with medium tanks for quite awhile before you get the flak half track up and build one of your own tanks and this will take even longer if they reduce the OKWs resources again like many people have been suggesting so what I think should happen to fix the OKWs potential anti tank problem and the worst OKW doctrine is removing the flammhetzer from the feuersturm doctrine and putting a regular hetzer in the med half track. The unit will have the same armor and health and the same price but it will now act like a better armored su 76 that has no barrage ability but instead gets the cautious movements ability at vet 1 and it will have access to the same mg upgrade that the flammhetzer has just to give it a little AI ability but it still wont be that much. To replace the flammhetzer in the feuersturm doctrine the Hummel should be put in because OKW players have been wanting that for a really long time and it will help a lot with the sim city problem that we are haveing now that the new British commanders have been introduced. In: COH2 Balance