|
Hi Owners/Admins,
What say to a Christmas drive where members put a few coins in the XMAS stocking that goes towards server expenditure and running costs?
I've always wanted to contribute somehow, but my artistic talent is null and void, and I'm not good enough for a promotion, though I'd still like to contribute.
I would wager and say there are others like myself out there.
So, what say to a banner/thread about donations?
Cheers,
S |
After testing the game for continuous months, by myself and our fellow balance testers from our high-tech state of the art labs, we have compiled a beautiful state of the game report. We have examined a wide variety of issues, bugs balance problems, underperforming units, overperforming units, middle performing units and neverperforming units.
Never in history such a large scale, beautiful state of the game have been prudoced by our coh2.org members. So I felt it is apporpriate to post it on the library. I will post the overiew tommorow, but no promises, so don't have yhold your hopes up high.
I beg our lovely and beautiful moderators to smash any kind of disrespectful and dehumanizing comments and protect the liberty of individuals on this forum.
Such lovely courtesy!
Are you able to share the report with us now OP (seeing how its tomorrow)?
PS: Where are these labs located?
I'm waiting for the first shitpost, and I think I know who it's coming from.
I havent seen anything, so I'm going to say me?
|
Ontopic:
You are entitled to your opinion that we should be ashamed of ourselves for even considering giving comparable AT options to both tiers, and experimenting with that in a balance preview mod. However, no matter how hard I try to scan your comments for useful feedback, all I see is ranting.
What is your proposed solution to the T1 problem?
In the most recent history, Soviet T1 has been through 3 different iterations
- Current iteration, where you have Flamer Penals, and Flamer Penals are really really worth it. Especially if you have guards/ your teammate can provide AT
- 1-year+ ago, when Luchs was locked behind T4, and 222 had 240HP with a need-to-buy autocannon upgrade. This meant that there was no light vehicle threat to worry about.
- Pre-buff Penals, where Soviets had to worry about 320HP auto-cannon 222 and T2 Luchs. That was a ~6-month period when Soviet T1 was not seen-of or heard-of.
Good observation Smith.
I will endeavour to give constructive feeback next time |
@OP Nope, bad idea. It would butcher Ostheer's map control even further, since you NEED and mg42 and can't spend the manpower on some other capping units.
As for other suggestions for removing cloak from rakettens. If you do so, you need to remove the raketten. The thing can't do much without its cloak.
The problem with maxim spam is that there are 6 guys in a maxim weapon team. If you have 3 or 4 maxims in buildings, you are in a bad world of pain. We must be careful with nerfing maxim, it can be cast into horribleness easily again.
Cloth on the ball as always |
So THAT's why it does no damage...
What is it?
You need LOS?
I cant see the pics  |
#TeamBigFuckingGun
Lul, with a crew of 2000 |
Panzer fusiliers are one of the cost effective rifle infantry in the game even exceeding regular grens . also their g43 upgrade is better then the grens and im not talking about the extra g43 and vision but that the g43 of the pzf (while having slightly less damage then gren g43) does a better job at increasing the damage then the gren g43.
also the JT's barrage ability is as powerful as a isu152 HE attack i beleive
+1 on this
Onces PzF get vet 5 they get sprint, and combined with kubel+breakthru, there goes half the map in 2 minutes.
As 4v4 primary player, that Jagh makes short work of everything.
|
|
OP, you are kidding right?
Just keep your distance man |
dont really give a rats backside about its RA cuz from gameplay experience it has the worst survivability out of all the AT guns. And whats so good about its damage per model? you want to go attack a rifleman squad with your rekketen?
isnt tier 1 suppose to be like a risk reward tier, you go for it to have better AI at the cost of AT. If soviets need AT, then do what ostheer does and tech up. It stupid enough that penals are getting some form of AT and now people want a buffed m-42 in it lol.
Fuckin A!
+1
Yep.
Not to mention with its rocket projectile it hits the ground in probably 60% of its shots.
+1
People don't really want anyting overpowered. All they ask is a solid tier they can go for instead of maxim spammy T2. Right now soviets are absolutely only faction without any tech choices. I don't count T1 as a choice as it is too easily countered and nobody uses it seriously.
Well thankfully YOU are not the 1 000s of other people that play this game.
I have one games with nothing but T1... And Im pretty retarted when it comes to SU
Why is access to one of the better AT guns in the game at T2 not enough? Please just stop this agenda of giving Soviets more and more AT.
I really feel like you guys are just f-ing with stuff just to f with stuff.
lol, play OKW much?
Fuck Oath
+2
|
My proposition:
I smoked some stuff and thought I should post
What do you think guys?
OP, srsly?
You want an AT gun in tier 1 that has both AI and AT?
I think current M-42 is ok.
Nice RoF, low damage, good vs light vehicles.
For late-game purpuse it might see some vet ability which increases damage/penetration for XX period of time.
+1
Can we actually try new penals first and then start discussing around lil at gun ?
Tier1 was never meant to have AT gun. Its mobile tier that give you good AI and early game pressure so you can field tanks on your own as counters to enemy tanks.
+1.
Have tried, didnt like, dont want to see PTRS penals
Wrong. Conspam gives far better early game pressure than T1 and Penals. Only thing that I can see giving good early pressure is Conspam + quick m3 Clown car.
Wut?
Conspam is countered by 2 MG's.
Said 2 MG's get raped by clown car strafing and penal or engy flamer
I see this modding balance thing going the wrong way lol
+1
It's already turning into a clusterf*ck
Let's not get confused though. Soviets need nerfs, not buffs and core design circumvention.
Penals need nerfs overall, not buffs.
The M42 is a highly valuable tool and performs right against its intended targets.
+1 on all sentences
T70 gun performance.
Raketen garrison ability.
Possibly canister round, mentioned above me.
As said in the other topic about the M42.
RIP historical accuracy... No AT gun in the world can fire canister shot...
|
Australia
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
