Profile of Stug life

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 4474

General Information


Thread: Relic Request: Remove Redundant Bulletins & Add few new ones24 Feb 2018, 12:09 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Feb 2018, 08:23 AMHighfiveeeee IMO Bulletins are bullshit either way. The only useful ones are the ones for your main line inf, but even they don't matter much because we talk about +2% buffs. And 95% of the things are useless crap either way. Like 'Medics are 5% faster' there is absolutely no use in that. say that to my supressing ostwind bulletin In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: About Jacksons24 Feb 2018, 12:07 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Feb 2018, 05:05 AMRosbone Will a Jackson squish squads like an M10 I like it when they go Squiiiiiisssh. you are around 3 patch behind, they nerfed m10 crush In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Rear armor of some vehicles needs to be reduced24 Feb 2018, 12:06 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Feb 2018, 05:56 AMelchino7 It basically has the same RoF as the Jackson, difference now is just 0.1s. PV role should be anti premium mediums. Give it back old RoF, improve acc and give it 200dmg which would make it good against Su76, same performance against normal 640HP medium tanks but it will dealt easier with 720/800HP tanks as well as heavier ones. a resonable buff to the PV ? neverrrrrrrrr In: Lobby
Thread: Rear armor of some vehicles needs to be reduced23 Feb 2018, 17:53 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Feb 2018, 17:47 PMVipper The case of KV-2 is similar to the case of the IS-2 and since according to developers IS-2 need its rear armor lowered so is the case for the KV-2. Any otherre balance KV-2 might need (like different vet bonuses and abilities) is irrelevant to its ability to to withstand rear armor shot from P4 and it has little reason to have the same rear armor value that Ostheer P4 has frontally. same for isu-152 In: Lobby
Thread: Rear armor of some vehicles needs to be reduced22 Feb 2018, 19:32 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Feb 2018, 19:07 PMferwiner I'm not saying he is wrong, just that his arguments are not convincing enough for me. These 2 units are actually pretty far from meta. So if he wants them nerfed for consistency reasons, maybe they should get something in return not to fall into oblivion completely. like the sturmtiger ? hell it was meta before nerf, now it can't even hit In: Lobby
Thread: Rear armor of some vehicles needs to be reduced22 Feb 2018, 19:06 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Feb 2018, 19:04 PMferwiner I must say I don't get the argument of "If any unit has a single stat better than KT then it must be nerfed". KT is just a tank, not a hero unit. for isu and kv2 he is right but the others are designed this way In: Lobby
Thread: Rear armor of some vehicles needs to be reduced22 Feb 2018, 14:35 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Feb 2018, 13:17 PMwandererraven and if reduce Rear armor = Reduce Some Side armor too (Front+Rear/2 = Side) Panzersherck Able deal Tank easier ? ????????where did u get this formula ? In: Lobby
Thread: Rear armor of some vehicles needs to be reduced22 Feb 2018, 12:37 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Feb 2018, 10:58 AMVipper "Heavy armored Tanks Developer Comments: We felt the risk associated with flanking a Heavy Armored Vehicle was much too great because of the high rear armor. To help balance this risk vs reward we are reducing rear armor on all heavy armor across the board. Soviet IS-2 rear armor reduced from 205 to 140 Wehrmacht Tiger & Tiger Ace rear armored reduced from 180 to 140 Wehrmacht Elefant rear armor reduced from 150 to 110 OKW Jagdtiger rear armor reduced from 150 to 110 OKW King Tiger rear armor reduced from 225 to 150 British Comet Tank rear armor reduced from 180 to 130" It is not a designer choice it is an oversight, because those unit where hardly used. PzIV with 110 penetration has 61% chance to penetrate rear shots vs 180 armor going to 69% at point blank. The chance is simply too low. yes but the draw back of the churchil and kv 1 is crappy main gun and mediocre frontal armor , they are tank made to go inside the enemy line and they are slow too kv8 maybe need lower rear armor but kv 1 and churchill would need a frontal armor buff if u nerf the rear In: Lobby
Thread: Did USF get nerfed22 Feb 2018, 10:34 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Feb 2018, 03:38 AMedibleshrapnel Ostheer got buffed and they feel kinda strong right now, which is crazy because i stopped playing them altogether back in 2016. ????? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Rear armor of some vehicles needs to be reduced22 Feb 2018, 10:33 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Feb 2018, 00:08 AMVipper In the patch that lowered the rear/side armor of most vehicles certain vehicles where forgotten and currently have more rear armor even than KT. Rear armor of KT is 150 KV-1 165 should be lowered KV-2 180 should be lowered ISU-152 155 should be lowered KV-8 145 should be lowered Churchill 180 should be lowered On the other hand the Hezter with its low range and no turret should have its rear/side armor increased from 80. Churchill and kv 1/8 is a design choice to have more rear armor, for kv2 it should be same as is2 and for isu152 same as elephant In: Lobby