Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - Soviet Feedback15 Apr 2021, 20:31 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Apr 2021, 18:42 PMthedarkarmadillo Likley feels off simply because of the contrast to soviet squads. Paras are there against 5 man rifles so the extra model offers a lot in means of durability. Also being able to reinforce off invisible pathfinder beacons gives them versatility and makes em feel tougher as you can reinforce even on the front (since the beacons don't cost anything you can have em where you need em) Compare to SOVIET AG are not durable, they are average. All squads have 7 men (well most anyways) and cons can get up to 6. The other smg elite infantry has armour so in the context of the soviet faction AG guards are actually squishy. How they stack up against other units in other factions is frankly irrelevant because it's not the units in the other factions that they are competing for pop cap with. I have no feelings towards AG as I have not tried em in this patch, but a squad that can get 3 lmgs shouldn't be indestructible AG have the same durability as guards (while being cheaper) The slightly better durability than Penal while being slight more expensive They have better durability then conscripts Only shock have better durability and that is because the have to move to range 10 while AG can fight at mid range. They are simply not "squishy, especially compared to other infantry of their type and cost" and they are are as viable against tank as Paras are. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: MG Shift queue's15 Apr 2021, 18:41 PM HMG are bug for quite some time now and some times will not fire. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - Soviet Feedback15 Apr 2021, 18:36 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Apr 2021, 16:12 PMMrBananaGrabber. Assault Guards are very squishy, especially compared to other infantry of their type and cost. They could really use a small buff to make them more viable, especially against tanks. AG are in line with USF paratroopers while being available and being cheaper. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - British Feedback15 Apr 2021, 11:57 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Apr 2021, 11:46 AMHannibal ... Simply replace the command upgrade with a command Valentine and move victor arty to an officer. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - Ostheer Feedback15 Apr 2021, 10:56 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Apr 2021, 10:30 AMGachiGasm It would have been better imo if command PIV used vCoH like hull down or like KV-2 siege equivalent, becomming immobile but maybe increasing radius of aura and RoF. Or its general power should be boosted a bit, because while it provides buffs and abilities its perfomance on its own is mediocre at best and considering it has to be in pottentual combat zones always kinda makes it a bit lacklaster. UKF command vehicle on the other hand while being less potent mobility and ROF vise still retain full combat capabilities, so there is no reason why combat PIV cant be at least on Ostwind lvl of AI capabilities. Also it would be really cool, if we got proper PIV with 75mm cannon as a buildable doc unit. UKF command vehicles suffer a list of penalties: -50% accuracy. +100% weapon cooldown -100% reload speed. The bonus to unit are also much higher. Having that said CPz could use lower XP , pop 10 and a changes to the gun. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - British Feedback15 Apr 2021, 08:17 AM Check the typhoon planes from all abilities they seem harder to shoot down than other planes. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The game slowly moves away from an historical WW2 game15 Apr 2021, 06:28 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Apr 2021, 21:50 PMMr. Someguy Soviets and Ostheer are 1943-1944 based on unit selection and uniforms... Try explaining this to the person who claims that "multiplayer is set in 1944-45." And it really besides the point, strafbats received high casualties through out the war. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - USF Feedback15 Apr 2021, 06:23 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Apr 2021, 06:06 AMEsxile I've been using the ability for some time and I consider it more like a long range with lower impact flamethrower vs unit in cover. Flamer and rifle-grenades have very little in common. Flamer squads have to close in to force enemy units out of garrison/heavy cover. Rifle-grenades are used from distance and force enemy unit to constantly reposition making them lose DPS. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - USF Feedback14 Apr 2021, 21:06 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Apr 2021, 20:56 PMEsxile The original version kept the 60 munitions cost to upgrade it and nerfed their cooldown into oblivion. My point stand, if it was a good idea to make them requiring user input fair enough then why didn't the team just followed with the idea? Instead we've got a declaration that the ability is in fact weak but get nerfed anyway. The reason is explained: "The rifle grenade changes are being reverted due to the lack of user friendliness." Patch notes do not say it is weak: "While it is an annoying weapon to deal with, it is not particularly powerful on its own with a travel time and delayed detonation. We are restoring the Rifle Grenade Launcher to its original form with only a slight nerf to its reload time." The cool down is not a nerf to oblivion either its about 14% longer. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The game slowly moves away from an historical WW2 game14 Apr 2021, 19:15 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Apr 2021, 17:51 PMelchino7 I'm under the impression that it was still godly at close range. I don't remember them having more range and it was mostly it's mobility the selling point. https://www.coh2.org/topic/4304/jaeger-infantry-commander-viability http://hardcoregamemode.blogspot.com/2013/07/guide-coh2-list-of-infantry-weapons-by.html The point of bringing history is the context of OP post (the first one was invis due to flaming). He complains about the current state of the game and that Relic did a better job, when the points he brings out were already done by Relic at that time. It used to have range 40 and damage 27 Probably had some thing like 4.4 DPS at range 40 and 8.2 at 0 so I would call it long range. Moving accuracy probably changes when it was turned into carbine but I am not sure. I personally find history not very helpful especially small arm before weapon profiles where introduced. It was a different system at that time. In: COH2 Gameplay