Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: CoH2 statistics of top200 ONLY.20 Apr 2021, 09:00 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Apr 2021, 08:53 AMleithianz Nope I was about to make a reply about it. As I argued previously, UKF is easy peace of cake IF you know how to counter them. Which is shown is this thread's stat. 200+ players do not know how to counter them. Probably the reason I see many people complaining in this forum about emplacements(which is not usable at all in most cases) & IS. I know it's kinda harsh, but sometimes you need to l2p to win... If you do not know how to counter early UC & IS. or against emplacement(not a big issue in 1v1 I guess), UKF can seems tough to you. Or it might be that UKF ranks are overinflated because there far less people playing as UKF. or it might be some other reason Now what is more probable that 200+ players are noobs? or that a UKF is easier to reach +200 than an OKW or Ostheer player? I will recap and leave here because this debate is not very constructive. UKF seem to be low and they need changes (probably a wider redesign than buff to here and there), but difference in win rates is an indication that something is off. Jump back to quoted post20 Apr 2021, 08:58 AMleithianz 1. this thread is top 200 only stat. I already posted thread about all player. Why keep bring it in? 2. OKW has the highest 2v2 ~ 4v4. While UKF has lowest on 1v1 ~ 4v4 even in all player. How can they are the smae...? And I already agreed on other thread that OKW is showing weak spots on 1v1. Probably because of pg not doing great at late game. (or maybe I did on Kor. community. Sorry keep posting on the both side. But yes I do agree OKW is a bit behind on 1v1 but not by a huge gap) I do not keep bringing it up I am responding to kaitof's bogus accusation that I am making numbers up. As I said we have to agree to disagree (although I am not sure to what). Have a nice day. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: CoH2 statistics of top200 ONLY.20 Apr 2021, 08:52 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Apr 2021, 08:46 AMKatitof You're also trying to tell OKW is closer to UKF, despite the uncontested hard evidence its not anywhere close and is on pair with 3 other factions. Any particular reason why you deflect that? Now check the "hard evidence again": https://www.coh2.org/file/19617/stat.jpg OKW 47.7 winrate UKF 47.5 winrate Can you give it rest with your conspiracy theory already? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: CoH2 statistics of top200 ONLY.20 Apr 2021, 08:50 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Apr 2021, 08:45 AMleithianz God... I posted this thread BECAUSE all player is not reliable to see balance.(Which modders already aruged) Because I myself can win eeeeasily anyone behind 200. Or even 100. It does not mean something is there. It's simply people 200+ is very hard to win against top 200 player. End of discussion. Okay? This is no way to debate in forum Jump back to quoted post20 Apr 2021, 08:45 AMleithianz How can I not see you as biased when you are trying to find something when there is nothing to find. I know I'm biased to UKF (obviously), but I have stats and arguments to back me up. You on the other side seems biased toward OKW, maybe it's just me. IDK. But to me, it seems you are trying to act as to be faired, but clearly not. You already chose your side. Which is fine, that's the whole point of the debate. That simply does not explain why it makes such a huge difference particularly on UKF. But you since you are "biased to UKF" we better agree to disagree. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: CoH2 statistics of top200 ONLY.20 Apr 2021, 08:37 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Apr 2021, 08:32 AMleithianz No 3v3 is where UKF played least games. (around 200) and I'm sorry I played some 3v3 in March. Which probably increased some wr. How sad that one player can influence total faction's wr. And I am with him on the fact that you are trying to ignore the facts from the stat. UKF consistently have lowest wr from 1v1 ~ 4v4. Not by little but by far. If you are not willing to accept the fact, please bring me some data or evidence so that I can understand your side of argument. I am not sure why you think I am not accepting facts. My first line is that UKF are low. Imo you should also not take "sides", this a forum for people to give their opinion not for people to fight. More over what katitof has posted has very little to do with what I have posted. Jump back to quoted post20 Apr 2021, 08:36 AMleithianz + it's not 2100. You added one more 0. It means 3v3 has so little match counted, it gave us what people say "outlier". Yet it is still one of the lowest. When "all players" option is included the total number for games played by UKF in 1vs1 is around 2.100. (1.125+1.018) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: CoH2 statistics of top200 ONLY.20 Apr 2021, 08:24 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Apr 2021, 08:08 AMKatitof You really are going overboard with mental gymnastics to bend statistics into your narrative. Pls avoid personal comments (12 time) Jump back to quoted post20 Apr 2021, 08:08 AMKatitof Perhaps its time to accept that OKW is much stronger then UKF and is on pair with other factions, while UKF is rock bottom instead of attempting to manipulate narrative that can't be contested here? You seem to have completely missed the point. (once more I might add). Try reading more carefully: Jump back to quoted post20 Apr 2021, 07:55 AMVipper Yes UKF seem to be low. It is also worth noting that: Jump back to quoted post20 Apr 2021, 08:08 AMKatitof There is no "hidden OP" here, sample size of almost 900 games is large enough to be accurate and there is no skill disparity games taken into account that would influence win ratios. UKF is UP, OKW is not, accept reality and cope. The fact that UKF win rates drop are increased by 5% when 2100 games are included is an indication that there is something there. It certainly is not "hidden OP" what ever you mean by that but there is something there. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: CoH2 statistics of top200 ONLY.20 Apr 2021, 08:18 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Apr 2021, 08:01 AMleithianz ... And with probably Kor. community agreeing with me, build JLI if you are having trouble vs UKF with OKW. Imo not having any problems but imo it worth checking if there a noticeable gap between UKF vs Ostheer and UKF vs OKW. That might also help come up with more specialized solutions. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - Ostheer Feedback20 Apr 2021, 08:15 AM What should imo be included in the Patch Command tank Lower pop and XP to match Ostwind, fix gun (increase close penetration as a minimum) Reason: The unit dashes less damage than PzIV and is closer to Ostwind pop and XP value should reflect that. Fix CAS commander Reason: too many mu abilities moving Luft commander here could help allot. Stug-E Fix vet 1 ability. Reason: A shot that does 40 damage is simply a joke. Panzer-J Increase XP value and increase rear armor to PzIV vet 2 level. Consider to redesign the unit to have a gun with Less AOE but better penetration to reduce overlap with PzIV Reason: The unit has lower XP value than PzIV The unit has the same rear armor of PzIV and does not get a bonus The unit overlap and could add more to the table if it performed better vs allied heavy tanks MHT 250/7 Increase CD on incendiary barrage and lower scatter Reason: The unit deliver damage inconstantly when using Inc.Barrage. FRS Change aura to a timed one Reason: Passive aura should be avoided when possible Officer Reduce reinforcement time Reason: Take longer than other unit to reinforce MOP Reduce cost of flare it too expansive compared both to Soviet mortar and UKF early warning. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: CoH2 statistics of top200 ONLY.20 Apr 2021, 07:58 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Apr 2021, 07:57 AMleithianz Do you not think the reason behind it is just like UKF shown 3 games out of 65 in ML, they is very low played game BECAUSE they sucks...? I myself quit playing UKF, and went to USF & OST. I simply cannot win with UKF. Jump back to quoted post20 Apr 2021, 07:55 AMVipper Yes UKF seem to be low. It is also worth noting that: It might be worth looking how well UKF do against Ostheer and OKW separately. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: CoH2 statistics of top200 ONLY.20 Apr 2021, 07:55 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Apr 2021, 07:48 AMleithianz .... Do I have to keep remind you how bad UKF is at the moment...? 42.6% on 1v1 40.3% on 2v2 is that still low but fairly in the range of statistically acceptable...? Yes UKF seem to be low. It is also worth noting that: The number of game with UKF is simply very low at that level. (893 game total) There is huge difference when including only 200+ and the all games with the UKF/OKW increasing the difference from 0.2% to 6%. This might be an indication that although UKF are weak they are strong vs OKW. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - Ostheer Feedback20 Apr 2021, 07:48 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Apr 2021, 06:25 AMMr. Someguy I don't quite understand why people see a quick-firing semi-automatic rifle and think "this is a long range rifle". In my experience most people believe this because of misinformation peddled by members of the community who also don't know how the mechanics work. Greyshot did this in his patch note review video where he was confused thinking the Panzerfusilier G43's were long range rifles, so I wouldn't be surprised if he was a source of this problem due to his following. The SVT-40 and M1 Garand are both semi-automatic rifles and they are best used at close-to-mid range. The G43 is a semi-automatic rifle and it is best used at close-to-mid range. I'm not sure why this is confusing. It is worth adding that the G43 DMR on OKW's Jaeger Light Infantry Recon is not an original part of the unit but was added during a redesign, so it's not like it's a misconception stemming from old vs new, because the SAR profile G43 is the original. This was my post #4848 SVT/M1/G43 where meant to use the Carbine profile that is designed for mid to far and serves as the middle ground between bolt action (far) and assault rifle like MP-44 which is mid to close. In: COH2 Balance