Profile of insaneHoshi

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 911

General Information
Steam: 76561197989687200


Thread: British infantry sections26 Feb 2018, 23:09 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Feb 2018, 14:51 PMA table They deserve to be OP because they cost 500 mp and 120 munitions, and only have 2 models with the bren and the other 3 with VERY sh!tty stens. Isn't 500 the combined cost of their actual cost value plus their deploy anywhere mechanic? And if cost justifies OP ness, why are expensive obers perform only slightly better than Bren IS? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: British infantry sections26 Feb 2018, 00:35 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Feb 2018, 16:24 PMcheese tonkatsu let's make volks cant get stg44. cuz they are 5 men squad. do you agree? Yeah because stgs are as powerful as Brens /s In: COH2 Balance
Thread: British infantry sections24 Feb 2018, 19:58 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Feb 2018, 19:22 PMTiger Baron Wait, weren't double brens fixed like double BARs? But yeah... the British are the only Army without non-docrtrinal snares and non-doctrinal mobile indirecrt fire support so I think they pay enough for their late game infantry dominance, but perhaps limiting them to only 1 bren would be enough, I prefer equipping them with 1 Bren and 1 PIAT to deal with both Vehicles and Infantry anyhow, I just wish the PIATs were their CoH counterparts in terms of stats. Do you mean double 1919s? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW infantry anti-tank is not sufficient19 Feb 2018, 21:10 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Feb 2018, 20:18 PMthedarkarmadillo But, against the far more cancerous soviet TD the JP armour and range really shines. Able to bounce 1 ib 5 shella but also needing 6 to kill vs guaranteed to pen and needing only 3 to kill... Huh? 5% isnt 1 in 5. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Heavy Vehicle doctrines and King Tiger19 Feb 2018, 07:26 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Feb 2018, 06:04 AMSmiling Tiger The Jagdtiger would work very well in the Elite Armored doctrine, because unlike the Sturmtiger, it would actually be able to use HEAT rounds which is one of the doctrines best abilities. This would allow the Jagdtiger to once again two shot medium tanks and better kill heavies and soft targets, which will further distinguish itself from the King Tiger. I don't think that this will be OP either, because of the required munitions cost of HEAT rounds and the short time period of the HEAT rounds ability. Why would you need Heat rounds on a JT? It does enough damage as is an there would be much salt. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: OKW infantry anti-tank is not sufficient18 Feb 2018, 04:57 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Feb 2018, 18:35 PMKatitof In my opinion outside of them both being 60 range TDs are incomparable as they serve 2 different sub roles. SU-85 is meant as all-rounder TD with heavy armor counter focus with low mobility, but high reliability, especially against heavies and is a top tier TD for soviets so that reliability is required as there is nothing above it. JP4 is meant to poke primarily medium armor and TDs(given its self spotting without crippling mobility and own target size), it does not need to engage heavy armor, because that's specifically what panther is meant for. JP4 has no vision increases anymore, whereas SU-85 does. Furthermore Su 85 has better mobility. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW infantry anti-tank is not sufficient16 Feb 2018, 19:24 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Feb 2018, 18:13 PMSkysTheLimit I can't believe you still go to these numbers from tests in vacuum when you compare units. 230 armor vs 140 might have something to do with it. Time to kill doesn't mean anything whatsoever, given that you have to pretend nothing else wants to shoot at the TD while it just chips away at a heavy. Jp4 can actually ping mediums/infantry AT trying to rush it which you know, might actually happen if your targeting a heavy tank with a Tank Destroyer. And the SU85 costs 130 fuel not 120. Has since the reload/penetration adjustment. Armour hardly matters since a) allied at has high pen anyways, b) it only really counts vs mediums and if the jp4 is getting hit by those, you've already made a mistake and will soon be out maneuvered. And while I'm ranting, they nerfed it's vet 5 so that it's ambush (a one time) bonus only does 200 damage, which is incredibly insignificant. Compare that to the m36s hvap which does bonus damage and pen and the firefly's vet 3 which is perminant. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW troops compared to SU/UKF/USF 16 Feb 2018, 09:28 AM Dont show the community balance team. They might again think volks and obers are a bit underpowered and nerf them again. /shitpost On topic looks like you skiped obers with lmgs vs bren and double bren. Also it would have been nice to see single vs double brens vs OKW troops. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet sniper15 Feb 2018, 19:44 PM Probibly the best solution for OST is to reduce scout car cost by 5-10 fuel and or actually give it enough armour to stop small arms. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: So, lets talk about the ISU-152 and jagtiger changes.12 Feb 2018, 18:54 PM I think what happened is that a necromancer came and posted in a bunch of old threads, but he got invised. In: COH2 Balance