Login

russian armor

OKW infantry anti-tank is not sufficient

PAGES (8)down
19 Feb 2018, 11:35 AM
#41
avatar of Esxile

Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1

So uh... I've been wondering if opening these threads means anything at all... I mean, do the mod makers actually take these threads seriously? If they do then I hope a new balance patch will come out soon to fix OKW...


I don't think so, how could they?
19 Feb 2018, 14:14 PM
#42
avatar of dk828315

Posts: 88

jump backJump back to quoted post19 Feb 2018, 11:35 AMEsxile


I don't think so, how could they?

Well, I mean if they even consider reading and telling the other guys in their team to look into what the players are complaining/proposing (if the players make some good points, obviously).

If they don't then this forum section is pretty pointless.
19 Feb 2018, 15:08 PM
#43
avatar of Esxile

Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1


Well, I mean if they even consider reading and telling the other guys in their team to look into what the players are complaining/proposing (if the players make some good points, obviously).

If they don't then this forum section is pretty pointless.


Well, so what are the good points made on this topic. Can't seen one.
19 Feb 2018, 16:07 PM
#44
avatar of FelixTHM

Posts: 503 | Subs: 1

Overpriced stug :O come on, jp4 is the best non doc AT in the game. Plus it costs roughly as much as a SU85, which is much worse than jp4. The only runner up to the jp4 is the jackson, but it is more expensive and still not as good.



Self-spotting, superior penetration, and noticeably lower resource costs indeed make the SU85 "much worse" than the JP4.
19 Feb 2018, 16:15 PM
#45
avatar of dk828315

Posts: 88

jump backJump back to quoted post19 Feb 2018, 15:08 PMEsxile


Well, so what are the good points made on this topic. Can't seen one.

The point is OKW has no proper AT infantry?
19 Feb 2018, 16:44 PM
#46
avatar of thedarkarmadillo

Posts: 5279


It's all a +1 for su 85
Jagdpanzer 4 advantage is armor (only useful against generalist) and target size.



To play devils advocate even with the tremendously higher pen on the su85 the JP4 still has a chance to bounce it at max range while the su85 will always be penned by the JP. so i mean there is that... Su85 should have a small pen reduction since it has that big buff with vet, but the JP4 is a good choice being the only non doc axis unit that not only can match the range of allied TDs but also being one of the few units that will deflect shots on occasion.
19 Feb 2018, 17:08 PM
#47
avatar of ZombiFrancis

Posts: 2742


Well, I mean if they even consider reading and telling the other guys in their team to look into what the players are complaining/proposing (if the players make some good points, obviously).

If they don't then this forum section is pretty pointless.


Balance forums are like public commenting periods: It's there to make you feel like you're involved, but has absolutely no bearing or influence on what is actually going to happen.

It's gives an idea of how the public feels about the changes that are already going to be made or have been made.
19 Feb 2018, 17:29 PM
#48
avatar of jagd wölfe

Posts: 1660



To play devils advocate even with the tremendously higher pen on the su85 the JP4 still has a chance to bounce it at max range while the su85 will always be penned by the JP. so i mean there is that... Su85 should have a small pen reduction since it has that big buff with vet, but the JP4 is a good choice being the only non doc axis unit that not only can match the range of allied TDs but also being one of the few units that will deflect shots on occasion.

Let's actually check it:
Jagdpanzer 4 armor: 230
Su 85 penetration: 220-230-240

It has a 5% of probability to bounce a shot at max range. Even if someone would actually argue it is "a chance to bounce" with a straight face (that would be a showcase of utmost politician skills), IIRC percentages under 9 or 6 % are considered null by the game.

The rest is based on the wrong idea that jp4 can actually make use of its armor against anything bigger than a generalist.
19 Feb 2018, 17:34 PM
#49
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1


To play devils advocate..

JP4 has a very good chance to win vs SU-85 but that does not justify the claim:

Overpriced stug :O come on, jp4 is the best non doc AT in the game. Plus it costs roughly as much as a SU85, which is much worse than jp4. The only runner up to the jp4 is the jackson, but it is more expensive and still not as good.


Su-85 is not "much worse" than the JP4 and the Jackson (only 5 fuel more expensive) is not inferior ("still not as good") to the JP4.
19 Feb 2018, 18:09 PM
#50
avatar of Firesparks

Posts: 1930


Let's actually check it:
Jagdpanzer 4 armor: 230
Su 85 penetration: 220-230-240

It has a 5% of probability to bounce a shot at max range. Even if someone would actually argue it is "a chance to bounce" with a straight face (that would be a showcase of utmost politician skills), IIRC percentages under 9 or 6 % are considered null by the game.

The rest is based on the wrong idea that jp4 can actually make use of its armor against anything bigger than a generalist.




To play devils advocate even with the tremendously higher pen on the su85 the JP4 still has a chance to bounce it at max range while the su85 will always be penned by the JP. so i mean there is that... Su85 should have a small pen reduction since it has that big buff with vet, but the JP4 is a good choice being the only non doc axis unit that not only can match the range of allied TDs but also being one of the few units that will deflect shots on occasion.


Jp4 doesn't just rely on having good armor, it's also one of the smallest target on the field. A size of 17 means the Jp4 can dodge as well as bounce shots.

On top of that, the jp4 have faster reload than the three Allied td.

the penetration is really the jp4's weakest element, and it's still enough to 100% pen the most common allied tank and td.

Both factor combined means the jp4 will reliably win in a td vs td fight.

really, the su-85 need a cost increased.
19 Feb 2018, 18:53 PM
#51
avatar of dk828315

Posts: 88



Balance forums are like public commenting periods: It's there to make you feel like you're involved, but has absolutely no bearing or influence on what is actually going to happen.

It's gives an idea of how the public feels about the changes that are already going to be made or have been made.

OK, guess I'll just silently hide and see how things go... I mean who would even bother to propose changes if the balancers just cover their ears and "Blah blah blah I can't hear you!"...

Double schreck for OKW is nothing but a distant dream...
19 Feb 2018, 19:08 PM
#52
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8


OK, guess I'll just silently hide and see how things go... I mean who would even bother to propose changes if the balancers just cover their ears and "Blah blah blah I can't hear you!"...

Double schreck for OKW is nothing but a distant dream...

Ofc it is nothing but a distant dream....

Modders who do balance patches for CoH said it multiple times, if you love ost features so much as okw player, play ost and vice versa.

These two factions have barely any difference at all now and you people want to mirror them even further to the point where having two will be pointless.
19 Feb 2018, 19:10 PM
#53
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1


Jp4 doesn't just rely on having good armor, it's also one of the smallest target on the field. A size of 17 means the Jp4 can dodge as well as bounce shots.

The difference in target is with SU-85 is 1 (18 even smaller than the Stug's 20).

Su-85 and M36 get x130% accuracy at vet 2 and FF has a mid range of 45(!!!) x110% accuracy from commander and another x130% at vet 3

Both armor (allied TDs will penetrate it reliably) and target size might help JP4 vs allied TD but do not guarantee victory, in addition M36 and Su-85 are more mobile and can break the engagement if they have to.

And JP4 needs to be strong vs allied TD because OKW luck the normal counters of 60 range ATGs and strong AT infantry.

JP is not a bad unit (it over priced and has too much pop as counter to allied mediums) but simply it is not more cost efficient than allied TDs.
19 Feb 2018, 19:54 PM
#54
avatar of Firesparks

Posts: 1930

jump backJump back to quoted post19 Feb 2018, 19:10 PMVipper

The difference in target is with SU-85 is 1 (18 even smaller than the Stug's 20).

Su-85 and M36 get x130% accuracy at vet 2 and FF has a mid range of 45(!!!) x110% accuracy from commander and another x130% at vet 3

Both armor (allied TDs will penetrate it reliably) and target size might help JP4 vs allied TD but do not guarantee victory, in addition M36 and Su-85 are more mobile and can break the engagement if they have to.

And JP4 needs to be strong vs allied TD because OKW luck the normal counters of 60 range ATGs and strong AT infantry.

JP is not a bad unit (it over priced and has too much pop as counter to allied mediums) but simply it is not more cost efficient than allied TDs.


really, you're going to bring vet 3 into this?

the jp4 is the only TD to get a hp boost at vet2, which make the the most survivable TD considering its armor, size, and HP.

The JP4 is survivable, Su-85 have the best gun, Jackson have speed, Firefly have (expensive) alpha strike. They need cost adjustment. The jp4 and Firefly need to be cheaper.
19 Feb 2018, 20:18 PM
#55
avatar of thedarkarmadillo

Posts: 5279


Let's actually check it:
Jagdpanzer 4 armor: 230
Su 85 penetration: 220-230-240

It has a 5% of probability to bounce a shot at max range. Even if someone would actually argue it is "a chance to bounce" with a straight face (that would be a showcase of utmost politician skills), IIRC percentages under 9 or 6 % are considered null by the game.

The rest is based on the wrong idea that jp4 can actually make use of its armor against anything bigger than a generalist.


Well, i mean IN the text you quoted i said that the su85 should lose some of its pen and even still, the fact that the pen on the su85 IS currently so high but, even as small as it is, has a chance to bounce the JP means that its armour is pretty impressive (i was under the impression that small chances to pen were null but any chance to bounce was untouched, as small as it is)

But, against the far more cancerous soviet TD (that being the su76) the JP armour and range really shines. Able to bounce 1 in 5 shells but also needing 6 pens to be killed vs guaranteed to pen and needing only 3 to kill and su76

And being able to bounce mediums more often than not IS a big deal when we are talking the prices were talking for these units.
19 Feb 2018, 21:10 PM
#56
avatar of insaneHoshi

Posts: 911


But, against the far more cancerous soviet TD the JP armour and range really shines. Able to bounce 1 ib 5 shella but also needing 6 to kill vs guaranteed to pen and needing only 3 to kill...


Huh? 5% isnt 1 in 5.
19 Feb 2018, 21:49 PM
#57
avatar of thedarkarmadillo

Posts: 5279



Huh? 5% isnt 1 in 5.

Gimme a sec here, seems i was having a stroke or something while typing. Ill go back and edit for clarity. Sorry bout that
20 Feb 2018, 00:24 AM
#58
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1


really, you're going to bring vet 3 into this?

I did not bring vet 3 into this. A FF has 94% chance to score a "natural" hit vs a JP from range 45 (which become even higher due to collision hits)(75% at range 60). By vet 3 its has 100% to hit a kubel in the same range.

Su-86 and M36 get the accuracy at vet 2 (more accurate than normal shot HVAP at vet 1).



the jp4 is the only TD to get a hp boost at vet2, which make the the most survivable TD considering its armor, size, and HP.

The JP4 is survivable, Su-85 have the best gun, Jackson have speed, Firefly have (expensive) alpha strike. They need cost adjustment. The jp4 and Firefly need to be cheaper.

FF needs to have its mid range adjusted to 30 as the rest of TDs and probably the tulips locked behind Anvil/Hammer (or maybe tulips only for Hammer and 17p only for Anvil).

Imo the TDs should be separated in "heavy TDs" (high penetration low accuracy) and "medium TDs" (meduim penetration high accuracy) and TS readjusted so that mediums tanks are not completely shut down the expensive TDs.
20 Feb 2018, 00:43 AM
#59
avatar of Firesparks

Posts: 1930

jump backJump back to quoted post20 Feb 2018, 00:24 AMVipper

I did not bring vet 3 into this.


jump backJump back to quoted post19 Feb 2018, 19:10 PMVipper

Su-85 and M36 get x130% accuracy at vet 2 and FF has a mid range of 45(!!!) x110% accuracy from commander and another x130% at vet 3


stop contradicting yourself.
20 Feb 2018, 01:21 AM
#60
avatar of jagd wölfe

Posts: 1660



Well, i mean IN the text you quoted i said that the su85 should lose some of its pen and even still, the fact that the pen on the su85 IS currently so high but, even as small as it is, has a chance to bounce the JP means that its armour is pretty impressive (i was under the impression that small chances to pen were null but any chance to bounce was untouched, as small as it is)

But, against the far more cancerous soviet TD (that being the su76) the JP armour and range really shines. Able to bounce 1 in 5 shells but also needing 6 pens to be killed vs guaranteed to pen and needing only 3 to kill and su76

And being able to bounce mediums more often than not IS a big deal when we are talking the prices were talking for these units.

"even as small as it is, has a chance to bounce the JP means that its armour is pretty impressive (i was under the impression that small chances to pen were null but any chance to bounce was untouched, as small as it is)"

Small chances ARE NULL JP4 won't bounce anything from su 85

"And being able to bounce mediums more often than not IS a big deal when we are talking the prices were talking for these units."

Generalist mid pen is 120.
It means 53% of penetration chances, hardly more often than not.
PAGES (8)down
2 users are browsing this thread: 2 guests

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

626 users are online: 626 guests
0 post in the last 24h
13 posts in the last week
32 posts in the last month
Registered members: 50085
Welcome our newest member, Hernanda
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM