Profile of insaneHoshi

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 911

General Information
Steam: 76561197989687200


Thread: Firefly need to be cheaper18 May 2018, 20:19 PM Jump back to quoted post18 May 2018, 16:48 PMmurky depths A situation where tanks are not at full health and engaging against a multitude of damage dealers, including AT nades and infantry AT weapons. In my experience it is very rare for 1 tank to go up against 1 tank destroyer and slug it out, usually there's a bunch of stuff going on and with multiple units firing. Even if you assume that a snare or shrek has already done 80 damage, again the extra 40 damage from the jp4 doesn't actually improve time to kill. Since iirc the only 120 damage increment that axis has is the puna, in that specific situation the 40 extra damage would be a benifit. But of course there could be possible situation, the extra 40 damage may be a benifit in specific circumstances, but discussions about its performance "in a vacuum " discussions like the ones that are occurring in this thread, the extra 40 damage by the numbers doesn't provide any benifit. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Firefly need to be cheaper17 May 2018, 22:18 PM Jump back to quoted post17 May 2018, 12:55 PMKatitof Should we also include JP4 first strike vet bonus too? That If you include FF vet, I can't see how this should not be included too. No because it's trash. I don't think there is a single scenario where a single 40 damage boost actually improves its time to kill against any allied vehicle.7 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SBP Change Notes17 May 2018, 21:59 PM Jump back to quoted post17 May 2018, 17:45 PMRocket Dumb they took out the change of okw having to build a truck to use flame nades. Just retarded being able to have the best garrison clearer deniers in the game at the very start. What are flamethrowers? Also I'm disappointed to see that the Leigs inconsistent changes are not addressed. Other mortars are loosing vet 3 range bonus for a vet 3 scatter bonus, the Leig is loosing a vet 3 range bonus for a vet 5 scatter bonus, which is very hard to obtain vs vet 3 mortars, doubly so with OKW inflated vet costs. Also the leigs veterancy is at this point been so torn apart and hacked togeather, it no longer makes sense and needs a rework. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Firefly need to be cheaper17 May 2018, 07:20 AM Jump back to quoted post17 May 2018, 05:52 AMFiresparks It work both ways. The 200 damage on the FF "negate" the jp4 vet 2 bonus, but the jp4 vet 2 bonus "negate" the FF vet 3 bonus. Except for the fact that the FF can easily do 80 damage at the click of a button which brings the 4 shot kill to a 3 shot kill. In this one limited scenario, the 240 damage is still a plus. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Firefly need to be cheaper16 May 2018, 19:36 PM Jump back to quoted post16 May 2018, 17:14 PMKatitof It does not make any difference vs medium armor, only vs panther and above. It does negate jp4s vet 2 bonus does it not? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Firefly need to be cheaper12 May 2018, 09:36 AM Yeah it's terrible that a TD with a turret has a slow turret rotation speed espically when compared to the turret rotation speed of the jp4 and the stug. /s You fail to mention that it has strong veteranacy bonuses that directly counter these downsides with a vet 3 Buff, +40 damage, that is unparalleled. Also having a low dps isn't that big of an issue when most of the time you are just taking pot shots at 60 range and the immediately retreating. Also having a mutionions heavy ability that nukes any vehicle causes requires a lot of munitions? Boo-hoo. You paint the cost:benifit ratio to using the ability as much more balanced than it is in reality. No one is not willing to stare the munitions for a good chance to kill a tank, its benifits far outweigh the munitions cost. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Snares12 May 2018, 01:03 AM Yeah axis vehicles have it so easy when they get snared. They can just pop out their crew and repair their engine damage and drive away. Oh wait a sec... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Spring Update - Balance thread9 May 2018, 20:53 PM Jump back to quoted post9 May 2018, 16:24 PMBiggy im talkgig about whole game, not exactly bout snipers. it is about equal units. panters=t34-85=sherman=crmwell in all characteristics and etc but first, if they make equal snipers, i wish to have equal heavy armor as soviet. So you want the Isu 152 aoe nerfed to nothing? Seems fair. Also I'll try to be as polite as possible in saying that the logic you are using to argue balance is stupid. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: different approach to delaying Luch timing2 May 2018, 06:41 AM So like 60 seconds for the research and 60 for the tank? Yeah that seems reasonable. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How can these are so durable?28 Apr 2018, 01:45 AM You need to stop making posts about how difficult it is for you to pick a doctrine that can one click delete buildings. In the first video It didn't actually get hit so there is that too. In: COH2 Balance