I’m not going to address the other things except for RE as I feel like you’re touched on things that other people didn’t even bring up here 0-0
In a straight up firefight, despite being better than CE, RE has neither the survivability or firepower to tickle enemy squads. e
Why should they? They are cheap, and have great utility. They don't need to be good in combat too. |
No one saying that IS-2 must be soviet verison of Pershing without flaws. IS-2 must be soviet KT with the same weaknesses and strong sides - slow and high cost unit, but powerfull. Now we have slightly cheaper KT with RNG cannon. You better prefer build instead of it 1-su85 and t-34 and got more advantages, than trying to hope that your IS-2 turn the game to your side. KT and Pershing in good hands could do that, but not IS-2. As said earlier, IS-2 give you only good defense state, but very unreliable in offensive.
There is no reason why the is2 should be the "be soviet KT" unless it were to require all tech buildings, we remove SU caches, and increase its cost. |
Bro, in a perfect situation yes rifle out damage volks. You have to take other factors into consideration. Rifle takes forever to fire snare, no sandbag, more expensive to reinforce, no long range damage.
So basically your saying if they are used poorly, they perform poorly.
Bro, that isn't a balance issue, you just need to l2p.
Oh and you are still lying when you say riflemen have 0 long range dps just like when you said volks were more durable. |
Its not really just comparison as ost teching unlocks more then UKF one, hence higher cost.
It also means you'll have only about 90 seconds to counter 222 from the very second you get aec and this early in game time runs fast, its not really hard to play conservatively with one 222 until second arrives, its not like AEC can just dive for it.
Thats true, but if we want to consider side tech, then UKF has ample opportunity to unlock piats and thus ukf cant "being pushed around like children" |
There's one tiny problem with that.
You can literally ram any British infantry to death with 444 because no snares ever. Cover bonus? Lol have fun being pushed around like children. 444 can deal with both infantry and AEC very reliably. Any MP loss inflicted on Brits will be insane while having enough firepower to deal with 1 AEC.
Did you miss the part where he said that resources being equal means UKF can get an AEC while UKF can only get one 222?
So it kinda makes sense that the 444 should be good as it requires more resources. |
Which is not the point.
The point is, it works in its role of non combat support.
Yes,because it's free.
Any minute benifit it brings to the field is a net positive, no matter what.
Compare that to the sturmofficer where you have to make a benifit/cost/opportunity cost decision to call it in. If it's not worth its cost, it does not work. |
Major is purely support unit, its 3 man squad and is wiped by a lucky mortar shell.
Its usable.
Major is also free. |
They also lack proper weapon upgrades and scale similary to other mainline infantries of other factions.
Guess what? So do Pgrens. Its not like they have strong veterancy bonuses.
OT the only reason shocks seem weak is because all others (Ppsha cons, penials and guards) are a bit strong in comparison. |
|
The only tweak that I could see making a difference is changeling or removing the functionally of a vehicle pivioting prior to movement if one clicks close to the tank. I think this inconsistency is a major cause of vehicle issues.
Also if you haven't rebound u (reverse) to a more accessible key, you've already messed up. |
I like the idea of giving it a unique damage buff Vs forward trucks or lefh. It would make the unit a good dislodging tool.
That's a pritty dumb idea. Why not just give it a button to delete all of okw's buildings and be done with it? |
Relic Entertainment
Heartless Jäger 
