Thread: 1v118 Oct 2022, 20:46 PM
1 |
Thread: 1vp18 Oct 2022, 20:14 PM
. |
i think slowing down the sniper shots would be better than just reducing its sight. reducing its sight would make only ukf sniper hard to coutnersnipe |
In Lost glider |
i think roll backing those two or making slightly stronger can fix ostruppen and 5men gren meta a bit.
There are no specific ways to punish covered unit except vehicles or tanks since when support weapons have been nerfed
That's why i concern about scott nerf too cuz usf will have only sherman to deal with that situation. |
1. How about adding +30 or+40 hp bonus at vet3 for m20 to prevent 2 shots death.
2. How about giving riflemen smoke back if he choose commander which has rifleman field defense or to rifleman company. |
1.mortar pit barrage shouldn't share cooldown with heavy mortar barrage, to give him a chance to fight back mortar or isg.
2.feels like raid tommies can't get advanced cover combat buff from mobile assault reg appropiately.
3. how about reducing tulip rocket cost from80 to 60 or 40 |
how about lower down resupply half-track cp from 4 to 3. compaered to other factions' hafltrack call-ins.
and adding vicker-k weapon box on hq for special weapons regiment. |
1. Brummber
You nerf scott and t70 like that. Nerf brummbar like this?
It just walk into the atgs and destroy em with one shot or two.
Nerf its armor. Nerf its damage. Add target number limit on this, not on t70.
Nerf its range to 35 like you did on 105 bulldozer which has slower shell, narrow aoe, lower armor.
2. medic bunker
increase its cost. don't combine ability with command bunker too cheap
|
1. M1918
If it isn't highly rated compared to other droppable weapons. O think ot shouls be remained as 33%. for fairness.
2. M2 50cal
Don't change it. why you guys keep removing differnces btw factions?
Anyway Mg34 and Mg42 has its slow setup time cuz it has a really big cover radius, 120°. And soviet has 6 men.
But without other change just nerfing M2? If you are not happy about m2 movement cuz it is <different> from mg42, why don't you make its radius 120°?
3. packhowi.
it is 340mp, 70 more expensive than okw isg and requires more men.
Shouldn't it be powerful if it is <paired> situation?
4. Scott
It comes out at the final tech and is designed to deal with support weapons, infatries Cuz usf doesn't have non-doctrinal massive artility like panzerwerfer, stuka and katty.
Fine, I can take other changes, but why range 50?
It is damn M8A1 <Howitzer MOTAR> carrier. It is fucking motar not a assault gun like a stug G or brumbar.
if it has to be range 50, make all other mortars, mortar carrier from ost usf range 50, too.
5. jackson
vet2 pen still needs against heavy tank.
And shouldn't vetrang units can't be poweful? why are you making axis tanks can pen allies one easily but why veteran
allies tanks can't? If it isn't no longer need its vet2 penetration bonus, why can't you just leave it?.
6. Wc51
At least give him armor buff and accuracy bonus or nerf to 40, not 35
why so you erase usf traits? You nerfed its ability. why you should erase crew system?
it is worsen version of wc51 before wc51's 45 range change patches.
Remember wc51 came out with guns in that time. |