Profile of SkysTheLimit

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: OKW best beginner faction?3 Jan 2022, 14:51 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Jan 2022, 13:48 PMBasedSecretary Lmao, OKW also does not have t0-hmg (which means that if your adversary pins you down with early hmg it's 99% gg) The fuck does that have to do with not having a tier 0 hmg? You don't use hmgs to counter hmgs OKW can have trouble with hmgs because of their access to indirect (which has been partially fixed) USF doesn't have a tier 0 hmg either, do they get spanked by mgs? No. Because they have a mortar In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: coh3 cry thread28 Dec 2021, 23:13 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Dec 2021, 18:54 PMGachiGasm I would really like to hear from people who says "nothing new", what actually "new" relic should have brought into the franchise? Maybe they wanted the Pacific? Idk, I don't think it would ever work for CoH, but I can't imagine what other "new" things people need Not to mention, some of the best decisions they made were bringing back some coh1 mechanics, like you pointed out. New isn't always better, and Im excited enough about the new things they have added In: COH3 Central
Thread: Establish retreat point28 Dec 2021, 20:36 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Dec 2021, 17:32 PMVipper You have also failed to post a single reason why in your opinion he should be able to lock VP sectors. Where's your reason it should be removed? Your entire argument is "it's powerful" Perfect example of something that sounds strong on paper but in practice is not even slightly an issue. So this thread isn't surprising at all In: Lobby
Thread: My real problem with COH315 Dec 2021, 19:00 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Dec 2021, 04:30 AMKurobane COH 2 has the same UI on live as it did during its Pre-Alpha period. That is not an excuse. Don't think there was a pre-alpha. And the alpha that we did get didn't come out over a year before the game like this one Shouldn't be a concern In: Lobby
Thread: Making APCBC-HE more player friendly15 Dec 2021, 18:58 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Dec 2021, 18:35 PMVipper (If you are looking for "secrets agendas" and "secret buffs" that is what you will find.) Nobody was looking for anything. Calm down You said that people weren't reading carefully enough, so I said you could've written more carefully too Until you responded to LXs post it was very easy to see this as a buff. It isn't. Okay then In: Lobby
Thread: Lefh 10515 Dec 2021, 17:34 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Dec 2021, 14:38 PMLady Xenarra +1 for blocking base shelling. As an aside can we do something about abilities like Air Superiority destroying structures (esp HQs) on the edge of the HQ sector due to the trail of bombs? Lost a Flak HQ to one such case. Or is that too late now? Probably too late. I would love if they could though, especially for tracking loiters too If the pass starts before they get the HQ and it takes some damage as it arrives that's one thing. Really annoying when a tank you thought they couldn't see suddenly gets wrecked by p47s/stuka when it's already deep in your base In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Making APCBC-HE more player friendly15 Dec 2021, 17:30 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Dec 2021, 08:32 AMVipper How a 17p and JT compare is irrelevant so is weather JT is strong or weak. You are the one who brought up the 17pdr.... In your first post you said to remove the preparation delay, which sounds like making it fire faster. You can write more carefully too In: Lobby
Thread: Making APCBC-HE more player friendly14 Dec 2021, 21:07 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Dec 2021, 18:05 PMVipper 2) The 17p AP round ability which is closest thing to APCBC-HE, and allows the unit to fire thru world objects does to track target for the start of the ability. 3) The ability are similar and cost the same only the 17p's does not come with reload penalty so there are inconsistency both in performance and behavior. Inconsistency? It's a stationary AT gun vs an armored heavy TD. There's a few other differences too btw JT is far from weak so I don't see the problem Jump back to quoted post14 Dec 2021, 18:05 PMVipper Now pls lose the forum warrior mentality and stop trying prove that you are "right". Oh come on In: Lobby
Thread: My real problem with COH312 Dec 2021, 06:44 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Dec 2021, 22:32 PMBasedSecretary My good man that is what I have been saying all along. Is it? Cause I'm blaming Relics initial design, whereas you seem to be dumping more blame on the community balance Relic regularly restricted what the balance team were allowed to touch. Once you know that I don't understand how anyone can really blame modteam Relic basically asked for communities help but then tied one of their hand behind their back while they helped. At least that's how it appeared to me In: Lobby
Thread: My real problem with COH310 Dec 2021, 23:28 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Dec 2021, 21:03 PMVipper And part of the problem was that it should be the other way round. The west front armies that should adjust to eastern front armies since the where relevantly balanced. I mean they certainly tried. They changed OKW completely. Barely resembles it's launch design. USF had some seismic changes too Brits in alpha looked like they were from CoH 6 in 2035, changed at launch, and changed again very much since then In: Lobby