Profile of SkysTheLimit

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: OKW Flak HQ Lethality12 Oct 2021, 10:56 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Oct 2021, 07:46 AMJulianSnow As stated earlier; if the Flak HQ is used aggresively it can easily be destroyed by a AT-gun, mortar, artillery piece or off-map ability (same way as Axis have to deal with the BOFORs). I don't really disagree. Just don't see the point of it, but at the end of the day all I'm asking for is it take up a tiny bit of pop space In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Flak HQ Lethality11 Oct 2021, 19:48 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Oct 2021, 11:28 AMKlement Pikhtura OKW needs 240 fuel just to get to armor tech or 210 to get obers. So if you remove the gun, the fuel price should go down as well, imo. 240? Not sure why you're including all 3 techs, you only need 2 to get armor Not to mention, the flak HQ has different units in it then when OKW was launched Jump back to quoted post11 Oct 2021, 11:38 AMJulianSnow Also, it's part of the design (also why OKW doesn't have fuel/muni caches). They also use to have lower income. And they didn't have an HMG or a stock medium tank. Volks used to have 1 shreck instead of Stgs Their original design is nothing like the current form In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Flak HQ Lethality11 Oct 2021, 08:34 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Oct 2021, 07:41 AMJulianSnow Didn't know this, don't quite see how this applies to the flak HQ tho. It applies to your point, you said they'd need to be compensated in some other way. One could say they already have, they were given another tool for defending territory that they didn't have when they were designed with the flak hq in mind In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why Brits Armor11 Oct 2021, 02:46 AM Why thread exist In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Wolfheze - Balance10 Oct 2021, 22:11 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Oct 2021, 21:13 PMRosbone I think three factors pushed leaving the fuel where it is: 1) Nostalgia. Keeping the map as close to the vCoh experience as possible. 2) The 2v2 map pool was getting very stale for tournaments. We needed some fresh maps. And the dual fuels are not a problem in tournament play. 3) Variety. Having the fuels together gives players different options. You can play two 1v1s or double the fuels and let the enemy get two munitions. Makes sense, I can respect all of those reasons Im positive about #2 cause the difference is night and day when I'm playing with a friend vs. with randoms. And we are far from tourney level players, but coordination changes everything In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Wolfheze - Balance10 Oct 2021, 18:33 PM I've had a lot of trouble with Wolfheze. I have it on veto when I'm playing with randoms Too many experiences getting double teamed on the fuel side and not getting any support. Both fuels being on one side is a little weird, but doesn't seem as bad with a partner In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Flak HQ Lethality9 Oct 2021, 20:57 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Oct 2021, 18:32 PMthedarkarmadillo Tbh I'd sooner have the gun require muni than pop cap. Ukf have their base howis but don't require pop for them, I'd much sooner see the flak truck pay per use. I'd be good with that. If the base howies didn't already have to pay per use I'd say they need a popcost as well In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Flak HQ Lethality9 Oct 2021, 08:49 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Oct 2021, 22:23 PMZyllen Why? this is not op as you have said it. Those things aren't mutually exclusive. Anything that can have that large an impact on the map should have a popcost Try to explain why OKW still needs the flak hq in the first place? Also I'm under the opinion MG bunkers and FPs should have a popcost as well. Anything on the map that fights should have a popcost (things like mines don't count) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Flak HQ Lethality8 Oct 2021, 18:17 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Oct 2021, 09:44 AMJulianSnow Solution imo could be to make the building AA-only, but then OKW should be compensated somewhere else. You mean like getting a stock HMG? OKW was launched with no mg34 stock, it was doctrinal. People complained, so they got one stock Flak HQ isn't really OP but the gun should really have a popcost. Make the gun a free upgrade after panzer authorization. Only cost is 5 pop or something close to that I dont see why OKW even needs the flak HQ anymore, but if it's not going anywhere at least give it a popcost In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Flak HQ Lethality6 Oct 2021, 21:14 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Oct 2021, 20:16 PMullumulu but..this isnt an issue with the schwerer. its on bofors and other fast shjooting guns too. like ostwind, centaur, okw HT, etc . All of those things have a popcost, and you pay for those units. The flak HQ is a free add-on, and it doesn't really need the ability to kill infantry. To control an area with suppression is more than enough In: COH2 Balance