Login

russian armor

Obers arriving earlier

  • This thread is locked
PAGES (5)down
2 Sep 2019, 13:34 PM
#21
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

Now that Hetzer is also locked to Panzer Authorization the truck setup could be lowered to 20-40 fuel. That could be a decent timing.

Ober's timing coming too early is not really as issues as long as they remain less cost efficient than penals. Imo it is the other infantry that should be delayed not ober that should come earlier.

Hezter and ostwind should not require the T4 building to exist.

Their timing could be fixed with CP.

Either all call in tanks should require both CP and tech or the double requirement should be limited to only to Super heavies.
2 Sep 2019, 14:25 PM
#22
avatar of SpaceCow

Posts: 47

jump backJump back to quoted post2 Sep 2019, 13:34 PMVipper

Ober's timing coming too early is not really as issues as long as they remain less cost efficient than penals. Imo it is the other infantry that should be delayed not ober that should come earlier.

Hezter and ostwind should not require the T4 building to exist.

Their timing could be fixed with CP.


Either all call in tanks should require both CP and tech or the double requirement should be limited to only to Super heavies.


I get your point but right now balance wise I think elite infantry is in a good spot. Now we have more Shocks,Storms, Pgrens and new builds with mixed army compositions. Delaying would require changes to timings, scaling and unit cost just to match the balance we have right now. Too much work if you ask me.

Also falls are arriving earlier now, and I'm sure we'll see adjustments to Paras, Commandos and Rangers if needed. That's the design choice the balance team made and it worked great so far.

I agree the timing for Hetzer and Ostwind isn't the best. But I haven't tested those units yet so I'm not really sure.

2 Sep 2019, 14:45 PM
#23
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post2 Sep 2019, 11:50 AMVipper
G43 PF are a good example of how alternative infatry should be designed, their main current problem is that even when upgraded they are the same power level with Penal.

Imo Penal had to buy their SVT also the game would be in far better place.

Obers become only cost efficient once upgunned.


That wouldn't work.
EFA have reduced early game by having to sacrifice capping power in order to built their tiers. OH received MG42, pio and mp boost to compensate.
If you reduce AI in Penals, you are just making the same mistake as when they made them 270mp units from 330/360mp (basically they were 6 man Grens with G43, just eclipsed by Guards at that time).

270mp Penals didn't see use, even if they had hoorah (?) and a flamer. And if you plan to adjust the tier or boost mp as other factions, you are either swapping the strat to sniper or boosting other builds instead.

Instead, there are 2 things you can do to SLOW down T1 Penal builds. Lock down satchel behind molotov upgrade and theme it as something anti garrison and PTRS upgrade behind AT nade and call it anti vehicle something.


Regarding Ober, they were made MP cost inefficient to make the LMG34 not cost 100/120 muni. They have always historically arrived too late and made them OP to compensate instead.

2 Sep 2019, 14:45 PM
#24
avatar of Balanced_Gamer

Posts: 783

The new patch for Obers changes is interesting.

Though what I think I disagree with is locking the MG upgrade once you acquire them.

I dont see why they should really lock it.

What is the point of getting Obers if other infantry units are going to perform better anyways with their upgrades.

MG34 upgrade should be available at the same time as Obers are acquired.

Otherwise, what is the point?


Guess we will have to see but I doubt Obers will be a pick without their upgrade.
2 Sep 2019, 15:31 PM
#25
avatar of BlueKnight

Posts: 320

2 Sep 2019, 15:53 PM
#26
avatar of Grumpy

Posts: 1958

The new patch for Obers changes is interesting.

Though what I think I disagree with is locking the MG upgrade once you acquire them.

I dont see why they should really lock it.

What is the point of getting Obers if other infantry units are going to perform better anyways with their upgrades.

MG34 upgrade should be available at the same time as Obers are acquired.

Otherwise, what is the point?


Guess we will have to see but I doubt Obers will be a pick without their upgrade.


They're still somewhat okay without the upgrade and you can start on getting veterancy sooner. I'd rather have them sooner, even if I have to wait for the upgrade.
2 Sep 2019, 16:45 PM
#27
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1



That wouldn't work.
...

The game was in completely different state, the built at the time included heavy use of weapons teams , including maxim spam while currently people use brute infatry force.

Penal where not being used because maxim spam was allot easier.

If we accept that PF design is the correct one for alternative mainline infatry, the same rules should apply to Penals as alternative infatry. That start weak and upgrade. Else PF should be able to upgrade with g43 from start with no MU cost.

The point I making is that if expensive lethal infatry are available early the game become about first engagements. If one can stop that strong infatry (SP/Penal or what ever else) he win, if that infatry win first engagements the game start to snowballs with little chance of a comeback.

The pace of the game should be set by the stock mainline infatry.
2 Sep 2019, 18:40 PM
#28
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post2 Sep 2019, 16:45 PMVipper

The game was in completely different state, the built at the time included heavy use of weapons teams , including maxim spam while currently people use brute infatry force.

Penal where not being used because maxim spam was allot easier.

The point I making is that if expensive lethal infatry are available early the game become about first engagements. If one can stop that strong infatry (SP/Penal or what ever else) he win, if that infatry win first engagements the game start to snowballs with little chance of a comeback.



I guess Grenadier vs Conscript spam meta were consider weapon teams at that time. You are underestimating the time frame Penals remain useless. 6 months after release they were a meme unit to recrew weapons with and it took 3 years to finally rework them. We've seen maxim spam, conscript spam (with and without PPSH), double clowncar, double sniper, 3 conscript into maxims, Guard spam, double Shock, cheesy wiping Partisans, etc.
EVERY SINGLE UNIT, on BOTH OH and SU, saw use with the exception of Penals and Su76 before their reworks. 3 years. You can't blame game state to a failed concept. It's like developers blaming players for not liking their vision design and not wanting to pay and play their games.

Penals when they were 360mp saw no use because you don't have the mp to build them, on top of having to waste resources in both, the cost of T1 and time you waste with your CE.
Penals at 270mp didn't see use, because you would rather have your CE be in the front and build 2 conscripts from the get go.

Penals will never be a thing, if they are made equally to PFs, Volks or slightly stronger Conscripts.
It's not hard to grasp the concept that SU starts with less man power and have to spend time and resources to build their tiers if they don't want to open up with conscripts.

If we accept that PF design is the correct one for alternative mainline infatry, the same rules should apply to Penals as alternative infatry. That start weak and upgrade. Else PF should be able to upgrade with g43 from start with no MU cost.


Would you build PF if you had to build a SwS truck first before been able to deploy them? That's why the concept is doomed from the start.
For PF to be equal to Penals, the moment you pick the commander you lose 80mp. SP are bound to the base till the SwS is built. And then you spend an extra 60mp to unlock PF. They now arrive as 6 man PF with 6 G43 which just mimic SVTs.

The pace of the game should be set by the stock mainline infatry.


That ended the moment main line infantry cost stopped being 240mp.
2 Sep 2019, 19:01 PM
#29
avatar of Sander93

Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6

Though what I think I disagree with is locking the MG upgrade once you acquire them.

I dont see why they should really lock it.

Well, obviously because the IR STG44 and LMG 34 upgrades are way too powerful to unleash as early as ~6-7 minutes into the game (easily achieved with team games resource inflation).


Otherwise, what is the point?

Fitting them into your build easier, and getting them early when enemy infantry isn't fully vetted and upgraded yet and tanks aren't roaming the battlefield already so they can start working towards their crucial vet 2 as soon as possible. If used from behind heavy cover, stock Obers should quite easily win vs most Allied infantry at that time.

2 Sep 2019, 19:06 PM
#30
avatar of Balanced_Gamer

Posts: 783


Well, obviously because the IR STG44 and LMG 34 upgrades are way too powerful to unleash as early as ~6-7 minutes into the game (easily achieved with team games resource inflation).



Fitting them into your build easier, and getting them early when enemy infantry isn't fully vetted and upgraded yet so they can start working towards their crucial vet 2 as soon as possible. If used from behind heavy cover, stock Obers should quite easily win vs all Allied infantry at that time.



Maybe you are right.

Anyway the changes the Devs made All in all is a step towards improvements. That is really good and important. Good work.

Lets see how it is when it is released.



Does anyone know by the way when it is definitely going to be released?

Hopefully they will release it by this weekend. It would be great since they have stated that it was their last mod preview for the September patch.
2 Sep 2019, 20:02 PM
#31
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post2 Sep 2019, 11:19 AMVipper

Obers are also more expensive than Penal and have more pop. At 340 manpower they are UP for cost compared to Penals, according to the stat you have provided.

I'd compare them to Tommies, against which they are adequately more powerful and more expensive.

Obers become only cost efficient once upgunned.

That's true, but we can't ignore their history of balancing and why they ended up where they are now.
They were supposed to be cost efficient -ONLY- once upgraded.
LMG became an upgrade to allow for stock price manpower to go down, it was basically shifting the cost from manpower to muni.
2 Sep 2019, 20:59 PM
#32
avatar of thedarkarmadillo

Posts: 5279



Volks are being adressed in the patch, so i leave them out of this discussion.




10mp increase is not "being addressed" its a joke is what it is. All of a second of manpower generation and up to 40mp more expensive for a standard build.... The maxim got a large cost increase ontop of its 3 other nerfs last time it was neutered so no volks isn't being addressed and omnio potent all role infantry needs to be taken into account when figuring out how to fit the elite infantry the aforementioned volks make not seem worth it to work.
Obers are a bonus if you can afford it, otherwise volks will more than make up for it by being able to build and deny cover and punish the enemy for closing and be on deck to blow an engine.
2 Sep 2019, 21:12 PM
#33
avatar of CODGUY

Posts: 888

Obersoldaten are just another get out of jail free card for OKW right along with their King Tiger so I don't know why anyone thinks it would be even close to balanced having them available immediately. You don't like using Volks all the time? I guess you've never used Riflemen or played USF then. Tommies will probably be Riflemen 2.0 after the next patch.
2 Sep 2019, 21:29 PM
#34
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1


I'd compare them to Tommies, against which they are adequately more powerful and more expensive.

feel free to compare what you like and if you do not like the penal ober comparison take it up with sanders who made it.
Obers with lmg upgrade are simply UP.


That's true, but we can't ignore their history of balancing and why they ended up where they are now.
They were supposed to be cost efficient -ONLY- once upgraded.
LMG became an upgrade to allow for stock price manpower to go down, it was basically shifting the cost from manpower to muni.

And I did not say that was a problem in anyway. On the contrary I said that Penal should start at lower power level and have weapon upgrade similar to Obers and G43 PF.

PLS do not quote me if what you are going to reply is irrelevant to my post you have quote from.
2 Sep 2019, 21:39 PM
#35
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1


I guess Grenadier vs Conscript spam meta were consider weapon teams at that time. You are underestimating the time frame Penals remain useless. 6 months after release they were a meme unit to recrew weapons with and it took 3 years to finally rework them. We've seen maxim spam, conscript spam (with and without PPSH), double clowncar, double sniper, 3 conscript into maxims, Guard spam, double Shock, cheesy wiping Partisans, etc.
EVERY SINGLE UNIT, on BOTH OH and SU, saw use with the exception of Penals and Su76 before their reworks. 3 years. You can't blame game state to a failed concept. It's like developers blaming players for not liking their vision design and not wanting to pay and play their games.

Imo you are simply underestimating the flamer Penals, you can test them in my MOD and you probably see how powerful they actually are. Combat wise they are more powerful than Assault engineers while costing less manpower.

The fact that they did not see much use mean little about their state. Many units did not see use and they anything but UP.


Penals when they were 360mp saw no use because you don't have the mp to build them, on top of having to waste resources in both, the cost of T1 and time you waste with your CE.
Penals at 270mp didn't see use, because you would rather have your CE be in the front and build 2 conscripts from the get go.

360 mp Penal are ancient history an irrelevant. Flamer Penal where not great before the flamer buff and people probably did not understand their potential after the flamer buff.


Penals will never be a thing, if they are made equally to PFs, Volks or slightly stronger Conscripts.
It's not hard to grasp the concept that SU starts with less man power and have to spend time and resources to build their tiers if they don't want to open up with conscripts.

I doubt there many ways to make penal work without being balanced around being OP but outnumbered. Which does not really balance them out modes above 1vs1.


Would you build PF if you had to build a SwS truck first before been able to deploy them? That's why the concept is doomed from the start.

If they come at penal power level and required truck being built and not set up, easily.



For PF to be equal to Penals, the moment you pick the commander you lose 80mp. SP are bound to the base till the SwS is built. And then you spend an extra 60mp to unlock PF. They now arrive as 6 man PF with 6 G43 which just mimic SVTs.

Again the point is not for PF to come with G43 but for penals to have the same tempo as other infatry and to have to buy the extra firepower.



That ended the moment main line infantry cost stopped being 240mp.

Not really. That ended when for no good reason powerful infatry become easier and earlier accessible and the trends continues.
2 Sep 2019, 22:35 PM
#36
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post2 Sep 2019, 21:39 PMVipper

Imo you are simply underestimating the flamer Penals, you can test them in my MOD and you probably see how powerful they actually are. The fact that they did not see much use mean little about their state. Many units did not see use and they anything but UP

360 mp Penal are ancient history an irrelevant. Flamer Penal where not great before the flamer buff and people probably did not understand their potential after the flamer buff.
.

3 years. Multiple tournaments. 1v1, 2v2 and the occasional organized 4v4 games. Several pro players who are still here and some who are gone. Veteran vcoh player and the ocassional high ranked developer. Yeah, no one understand the unit.
It's not Dhska, it's hard to incorporate into a building cause you need late game tank commander to be meta, secret OP. It was meme tier Hetzer unit level.

I doubt there many ways to make penal work without being balanced around being OP but outnumbered. Which does not really balance them out modes above 1vs1.


And that also applies to many other units, with the difference that Penals are not as great into the mid-late game, which on teamgames, arrives way faster because people can actually skip tiers and key units.

If they come at penal power level and required truck being built and not set up, easily.
Again the point is not for PF to come with G43 but for penals to have the same tempo as other infatry and to have to buy the extra firepower.


I see you purposely skip the fact that the initial mp, building time and tier investment are what keeps the unit in check.
Asking for same treatment on PF as Penals, is asking for the same drawbacks the unit have.

The tempo IS the building time, the mp disposal and the map control. I'm not opposed to mid-game further investment so they have to pay to unlock both satchel/PTRS. Reducing the difference in mp effectiveness with Conscript/maxim builds while slowing them down towards the T70.

Not really. That ended when for no good reason powerful infatry become easier and earlier accessible and the trends continues.


USF, OKW says hi. Then UKF to join the mix. All factions design around spamming infantry to overpower the lack of early options in support weapons. WFA set the tempo to be faster, once they managed to slow it down just a couple of months before their release.
2 Sep 2019, 22:48 PM
#37
avatar of Stug life

Posts: 4474

.

And that also applies to many other units, with the difference that Penals are not as great into the mid-late game, which on teamgames, arrives way faster because people can actually skip tiers and key units.
just so u know, upgraded pfusi and penal have similar dps, and almost same vet bonus, and people consider pfusi quote: "THE BEST SCALING INF IN THE GAME"

so they fall of cause ?
2 Sep 2019, 23:04 PM
#38
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

.

3 years. Multiple tournaments. 1v1, 2v2 and the occasional organized 4v4 games. Several pro players who are still here and some who are gone. Veteran vcoh player and the ocassional high ranked developer. Yeah, no one understand the unit.
It's not Dhska, it's hard to incorporate into a building cause you need late game tank commander to be meta, secret OP. It was meme tier Hetzer unit level.

The game is completely different after 3 years of patches. Once more simply test them in my MOD.



And that also applies to many other units, with the difference that Penals are not as great into the mid-late game, which on teamgames, arrives way faster because people can actually skip tiers and key units.

That makes the unit badly design which is my original point.



I see you purposely skip the fact that the initial mp, building time and tier investment are what keeps the unit in check.
Asking for same treatment on PF as Penals, is asking for the same drawbacks the unit have.

I did not skip any facts because there are no fact, you asked my a hypothetical question and my answer is that I would use PF if they come after SWS being built (which is later than T1) costed 300 had the same built time as Penal and come with g43.

I can make a MOD is you would like to test actually test them.

Again my point that MOD team has decided to make PF an alternative mainline infatry and they choose weapon upgrade to achieved it. They should apply the same design to Penal who are an alternative mainline infatry.


The tempo IS the building time, the mp disposal and the map control.
I'm not opposed to mid-game further investment so they have to pay to unlock both satchel/PTRS. Reducing the difference in mp effectiveness with Conscript/maxim builds while slowing them down towards the T70.

Glad that we agree.


USF, OKW says hi. Then UKF to join the mix. All factions design around spamming infantry to overpower the lack of early options in support weapons. WFA set the tempo to be faster, once they managed to slow it down just a couple of months before their release.

That was problematic only at release and was quickly fixed. Any problem had do with faction design and cheesy and not early small arm balance which has change little. Basic stat of Grens, Riflemen VG has seen little changes.
2 Sep 2019, 23:20 PM
#39
avatar of thedarkarmadillo

Posts: 5279

just so u know, upgraded pfusi and penal have similar dps, and almost same vet bonus, and people consider pfusi quote: "THE BEST SCALING INF IN THE GAME"

so they fall of cause ?

Fussies have 5 levels ov vet, team weaponsupport and forward heals always available which makes a difference. If fussies were copy and pasted penals they would still scale better because by design the faction scales better.
2 Sep 2019, 23:34 PM
#40
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

just so u know, upgraded pfusi and penal have similar dps, and almost same vet bonus, and people consider pfusi quote: "THE BEST SCALING INF IN THE GAME"

so they fall of cause ?


Weapon upgrades and DPS concentration. If you lose them, you don't want to replace them with another Penal vet 0.
PTRS late game are only there for the AT satchel. Reinforce/capping wise, you would rather have a Conscript.

Best scaling infantry are Rifles followed by IS. That doesn't mean you can always make it to that point.
PAGES (5)down
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

SHOUT IT OUT!

No ProfanityNumber of ShoutsRefresh Shout Box
Osinyagov: Suddenly, coh2 is slowly dying, but you can play it, playerbase still big enough
09 Apr 2025, 17:00 PM
Osinyagov: Wow, i remember you from zansi and vali videos, good old memories
09 Apr 2025, 16:58 PM
Beinhard: o7 miss this game and zansi
09 Apr 2025, 14:09 PM
Lady Xenarra: @Willy Pete The lack of April Fools this year is odd lol
02 Apr 2025, 01:34 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone not dead yet. when that happens the font will switch to Papyrus :*(
02 Apr 2025, 00:16 AM
dasheepeh: it was an honor guys :guyokay:
01 Apr 2025, 20:34 PM
aerafield: yeah I already prepared my "Can't believe there's comic mode for the 10 daily visitors even on this April 1st" :guyokay:
01 Apr 2025, 20:29 PM
Rosbone: @dasheepeh I guess that means this site is officially dead :guyokay:
01 Apr 2025, 20:19 PM
dasheepeh: no comic sans font for april 1st this year?
01 Apr 2025, 19:56 PM
Willy Pete: @Lady Xenarra this you? https://i.imgflip.com/3e4thi.jpg
01 Apr 2025, 02:53 AM
Lady Xenarra: Does anyone else think that USF needs buffs? It feels like they’re on life support sometimes
01 Apr 2025, 02:36 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone Ahh I missed that memo. I still think its a bad decision though. Adds frustration for players and isnt gonna make them that much money
27 Mar 2025, 15:46 PM
Rosbone: It is also good they left it free until after the free to play weekend. Points for that.
27 Mar 2025, 09:34 AM
Rosbone: But I agree, the cost to get a full decent Coh game pushing $115 US is not the best idea. Especially when it needs so much more work for casuals.
27 Mar 2025, 09:32 AM
Rosbone: To be fair, it was a thank you to early fans right? They said it was not free for long and it would become a pay DLC at some point.
27 Mar 2025, 09:30 AM
Willy Pete: Re-releasing free DLC so they can charge new players money for it. Brilliant marketing strategy :clap:
27 Mar 2025, 04:31 AM
Soheil: Coh2 still broken server ?
25 Mar 2025, 18:27 PM
Rosbone: Congrats to Relic. Looks like Coh3 has finally usurped Coh2 s the popular Coh. You smell terrific. :snfQuinn:.
24 Mar 2025, 02:46 AM
Nickbn: and again someone else replies. I mean come on guys. Give @adamírcz a chance
22 Mar 2025, 14:00 PM
Willy Pete: @Nickbn you didn't ask a question, and this is a chat box...
20 Mar 2025, 13:11 PM
Nickbn: @Rosbone it's incredibly rude to speak on someone elses behalf, especially when a question is directly adressed to them. I understand your passion for the subject at hand but I want to hear from him.
20 Mar 2025, 10:16 AM
Rosbone: @Nickbn No, I am just saying people should not be using any Relic owned forum since they have proven they ban anyone who says true things about Coh3.
18 Mar 2025, 19:01 PM
Nickbn: @Rosbone do you speak on his behalf? I didn't know. In that case keep us updated please.
18 Mar 2025, 16:47 PM
Rosbone: #RelicModdedEchoChamber
16 Mar 2025, 17:54 PM
Rosbone: @Nickbn True except, the only people on the Relic Discord/Reddit/Steam are brain washed monkey zealots. They wont even understand what @adamírcz is talking about. Anyone else is banned.
16 Mar 2025, 17:54 PM
Nickbn: @adamírcz might be a better idea to voice this to relic directly than to voice it here, in a shoutbox of a nearly deade fansite #justsaying...
16 Mar 2025, 16:36 PM
webdesign-muenchen-w: @Rosbone it is sick
14 Mar 2025, 22:09 PM
aerafield: @adamírcz aren't the first two disconnects free every day?
14 Mar 2025, 19:26 PM
Rosbone: It is so unlike Relic to punish its fans and community.
14 Mar 2025, 12:07 PM
adamírcz: So, I just got a leaver penalty without even getting onto the loading screen because of the game disconnecting, bravo Relic
14 Mar 2025, 10:45 AM
Rosbone: It is an indicator of the very short sighted capitalist view that plagues any company where leadership does not understand the product.
13 Mar 2025, 20:00 PM
Rosbone: They dont care about Coh3 or Coh in general. They are just trying to grab cash by ripping off the small user base they have.
13 Mar 2025, 19:58 PM
Rosbone: Just making mistake after mistake after mistake.
13 Mar 2025, 19:57 PM
Rosbone: It is clear they crapped out an unfinished game. And are now barely supporting it as they make new smaller games. Coh3 is stillborn. It will be meh for at least another 2-4 years. Meaning they killed the whole franchise instead of growing it.
13 Mar 2025, 19:56 PM
Rosbone: For a thing they could fix in minutes. Literally minutes.
13 Mar 2025, 19:53 PM
Rosbone: If I did play coh3 and was mainly a skirmish player, I would be pissed and probably stop playing. And it has been like this since release. Why? I would not tell my friends to buy a game I am not even playing. Lost sales and angered users.
13 Mar 2025, 19:53 PM
Rosbone: I am just saddened how Relic keeps hurting themselves by not fixing 5 minute things like menus. Why anger users with stuff that could be fixed in minutes???
13 Mar 2025, 19:50 PM
Rosbone: I was wondering why people think I was raging. I think it was when I said "because coh3 sucks so bad". That was not my opinion. Just a general feel from top players/streamers. I dont play Coh3 and have NO opinion of it.
13 Mar 2025, 19:48 PM
OKSpitfire: You can rage as often as you like btw, you usually manage to make it pretty funny.
12 Mar 2025, 11:18 AM
Rosbone: So it was a systemic failure across multiple disciplines and check points.
12 Mar 2025, 04:30 AM
Rosbone: Knowing how companies work, I imagine a new hire making the menus. The API they are using is complicated and things were hard to figure out. But at some point QA or management should have addressed these things. Usually within 6 months of starting.
12 Mar 2025, 04:29 AM
Rosbone: @theekvn I dont hate Coh3 or Relic. I just dont understand how you work on Coh3 for like 7 years and the menu system is worse than if a Programming 101 student made it. Feel free to explain it to me.
12 Mar 2025, 04:07 AM
theekvn: + 33% dmg rear hit was best deal ever.
12 Mar 2025, 04:00 AM
theekvn: KT just need fuel debuf from 15% to 50%, Ele arc of fire- aim time improve and they are good to go
12 Mar 2025, 03:59 AM
theekvn: and please Rosbone,I know you hate Coh3 to the bone due to your drama with relic, Still, Can you give a proper point of view instead of raging ?.
12 Mar 2025, 03:54 AM
theekvn: you rather go 76 to unity Whizbang 2.0 or go home.
12 Mar 2025, 03:52 AM
theekvn: also US tier 4 is 145f and Sherman pen 140 nerf is too much.
12 Mar 2025, 03:52 AM
theekvn: Whizbang lock behind CP, meanwhile stuka is techtree progress
12 Mar 2025, 03:51 AM
KoRneY: @aerafield It's possible that it is underpriced for what it is capable of now, no need to go full retard and take it immediately as a massive problem. It costs 60 more MP than a pz.3 and in 2v2 the barrage can be quite strong.
07 Mar 2025, 19:14 PM
OKSpitfire: I do like that they made the Stuka more expensive instead of nerfing it into the ground though. Found it pretty unsatisfying to use before that buff a while back....
06 Mar 2025, 16:35 PM
aerafield: USF already is by far the shittiest faction in terms of countering blobbing and turtling, now they supposedly have one overtuned tool locked behind a BG and it's immediately a massive problem?
06 Mar 2025, 13:33 PM
Lady Xenarra: I think post-2.0 Whizbang buffs, the price is too low esp since the Stuka got nerfed in cost too. Speaking of which, how exactly is one supposed to successfully dive this Sherman in disguise? Med tank spam running into SSFs?
06 Mar 2025, 12:13 PM
OKSpitfire: A powerful, doctrinal unit that outperforms stock stuff? Colour me shocked! :P
06 Mar 2025, 10:49 AM
Willy Pete: Cool you wanna lose your stock lategame arty too then?
06 Mar 2025, 03:20 AM
Lady Xenarra: WTB Whizzbang for DAK instead of Stuka, 5 fuel cheape, 60MP more expensive and next to impossible to dive. :rofl:
05 Mar 2025, 20:27 PM
Rosbone: It is also hard to expect Relic to help Coh2 when they cant even make working menus in Coh3 yet, 2 years after release and at full price+ for DLCs. Thats like asking a fish to do calculus.
04 Mar 2025, 02:58 AM
Rosbone: But this last patch has made good progress for grabbing players. All we can hope is Coh3 gets to Coh2s quality level before everyone abandons the franchise. Its Relic so they will completely f*%k it up as usual. But its a hope/cope.
04 Mar 2025, 02:55 AM
Rosbone: Relic wants Coh2 to fail so players will migrate to Coh3. It is hard to blame them since Coh3 sucks so bad. It needs all the help it can get.
04 Mar 2025, 02:53 AM

Livestreams

unknown 20
Australia 1

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

347 users are online: 347 guests
0 post in the last 24h
3 posts in the last week
47 posts in the last month
Registered members: 53741
Welcome our newest member, Cobell50
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM