260MP 6-man squad sounds too strong to me.
(I know they are shit but cons are 240 and don't have a 160mp unlock fee)
Posts: 5279
260MP 6-man squad sounds too strong to me.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
260MP 6-man squad sounds too strong to me.
Posts: 261
You'll probably lose your head when you'll hear about 240 and 200mp 6-man squads, the cheaper one even coming with its own LMG in mid to late game without any additional fuel investments.
Posts: 4474
cons are 6 men 240, they would be cons without increase target size and 2-3 base stv , if 260 is too low try 270
260MP 6-man squad sounds too strong to me.
Posts: 5279
Are you torlling? 260MP Penals have significant advantages over the cheaper 6-man squads.
260MP Penals comparing to Cons:
20 more MP for 2 or 3 SVT is too cost-effective.
260MP Penals comparing to Osttruppen:
The later has 1.25 target size, they die like flies in mid-late game.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Are you torlling? 260MP Penals have significant advantages over the cheaper 6-man squads.
260MP Penals comparing to Cons:
20 more MP for 2 or 3 SVT is too cost-effective.
260MP Penals comparing to Osttruppen:
The later has 1.25 target size, they die like flies in mid-late game.
Posts: 4474
really wrong comparison, green and volks have about same dps for total squad
Compare the difference between grens and volks for 10mp alone(currently).
Its perfectly reasonable in context of price to performance relations between other squads.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
really wrong comparison, green and volks have about same dps for total squad
try cav rfiel and normal rifle
Posts: 2243
Posts: 4474
we have the opposite here, they have better dura and better dps
Exactly.
They have same DPS, but differ in durability.
Cav rifles vs normal ones are 2 different archetypes.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
And why exactly are you comparing then to ostroppen? The absolute only thing they have in common is squad size. That's literally it.
Can you compare shocks and ostroppen next? Or maybe Obers and partisans?
Oh oh oh what about rangers and 5 man pios?
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
cons are 6 men 240, they would be cons without increase target size and 2-3 base stv , if 260 is too low try 270
Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it
Updates for March 6th, 2014
Cost from 360 MP to 270 MP
Population from 9 to 7
Fast forward
June 21st 2016
Squad cost increased to 300 manpower from 270 manpower
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
....
If you want to implement something new, do something which hasn't been tried before and failed.
Posts: 4474
they would still get the other stv , they just have to pay muni for it like 40 mun for 4-3 stv and get locked out of ptrs
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Now does this have anything to do with Obers?
they would still get the other stv , they just have to pay muni for it like 40 mun for 4-3 stv and get locked out of ptrs
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Get the right commander
Posts: 249
Posts: 2358
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Actually, the only right way to solve obers arriving too late is simply nerfing al assault infantries, including penals, IS and riflemen.
The current earlygame causes too much MP bleed, so much is a viable strategy in 1v1s. Too much early game aggressivity also gives a lot of XP and veterancy, by the time Obers can enter the battlefield they are already being haunted by vet3 infantry, big AoE explosions and medium tanks.
Posts: 2358
60 | |||||
19 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 |