Login

russian armor
COH2.ORG » Forums » Parlor Room » COH2 Central » COH2 Balance » Soviet September patch discussion

Soviet September patch discussion

  • This thread is locked
PAGES (30)down
New topic New topic    
Crecer13
4 Sep 2019, 15:09 PM
#561
avatar of Crecer13

Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post4 Sep 2019, 14:58 PMStug life
they should come in doc tho :snfPeter:

My main concept:
- Conscripts are renamed to "strelki (rifleman)" or "rifle squad" get the opportunity to purchase SVT-40 after the construction of T1 / T2, maybe get a fragmentation grenade instead of Molotov garbage. Merge deleted
- Penalties are renamed to "Conscripts " and placed in the ability "rapid conscript" get Molotov and merge.
- Guard always synergize with T1. It was always you build T1 and build the Guard, after PTRS Penalties it was gone. If 2CP is late for early light cars. Guard can be built in T1.
- The Shock Troops are getting Explosion package.
Reply Reply Multi Quote
thedarkarmadillo
4 Sep 2019, 15:14 PM
#562
avatar of thedarkarmadillo

Posts: 5279

jump backJump back to quoted post4 Sep 2019, 14:12 PMCrecer13


And what's the point then in the Penals if they have to buy SVT-40? This will be T1 Conscripts with the possibility of SVT-40 purchase. Then it is much simpler and more profitable to simply remove the Penals and transfer the SVT-40 to the Conscripts. This will solve the question of the disgusting design of the two starting infantry units. If we leave the Conscripts as they are and make the Penalts with the purchase of SVT-40, then in the end we will get instead of one unviable tier two unviable tiers.
vet mostly
Con vet is mostly defensive in nature while penals are all about the offense. Could be a really good dynamic if pulled off right.
#stalinwept
Reply Reply Multi Quote
Grumpy
4 Sep 2019, 17:20 PM
#563
avatar of Grumpy

Posts: 1954

jump backJump back to quoted post4 Sep 2019, 14:25 PMStark





This would be interesting if it turned them into the Soviet version of PF's.
Reply Reply Multi Quote
Stug life
4 Sep 2019, 17:26 PM
#564
avatar of Stug life

Posts: 4474

jump backJump back to quoted post4 Sep 2019, 17:20 PMGrumpy


This would be interesting if it turned them into the Soviet version of PF's.
something like:
260 mp 4-3 mosin 3-2 stv , can upgrade either ptrs or rest of stv for 45-50 mun
katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
Reply Reply Multi Quote
EtherealDragon
7 Sep 2019, 06:20 AM
#565
avatar of EtherealDragon

Posts: 1890 | Subs: 1

Would be nice if the new assault guards had their vet 1 ability and veterancy tweaked a bit. They should maybe get smoke grenade and the trip wire flares replaced with suppressing fire or something more useful.
Reply Reply Multi Quote
Vipper
7 Sep 2019, 13:45 PM
#566
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

Since PPsh upgrade is coming inline with other similar abilities imo it should take a weapon slot.
:)
Reply Reply Multi Quote
Katitof
7 Sep 2019, 13:53 PM
#567
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post7 Sep 2019, 13:45 PMVipper
Since PPsh upgrade is coming inline with other similar abilities imo it should take a weapon slot.

Because every buff to conscripts needs to be met with a nerf, because reasons.
jump backJump back to quoted post25 Nov 2015, 11:09 AM$nuffy
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Reply Reply Multi Quote
Vipper
7 Sep 2019, 14:27 PM
#568
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

Actually Soviets should be a special snowflake and have one of the few units that their weapon upgrade take up no slots, because reasons.
:)
Reply Reply Multi Quote
gbem
7 Sep 2019, 14:28 PM
#569
avatar of gbem

Posts: 1979

jump backJump back to quoted post7 Sep 2019, 14:27 PMVipper
Actually Soviets should be a special snowflake and have one of the few units that their weapon upgrade take up no slots, because reasons.


conscripts + T2 builds still remain completely unviable though... conscripts are only really viable when doing a penal transition build but never a T2 build...
Reply Reply Multi Quote
Vipper
7 Sep 2019, 14:30 PM
#570
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post7 Sep 2019, 14:28 PMgbem


conscripts + T2 builds still remain completely unviable though... conscripts are only really viable when doing a penal transition build but never a T2 build...

Does you response has anything to do with the post you have quoted?
:)
Reply Reply Multi Quote
gbem
7 Sep 2019, 14:30 PM
#571
avatar of gbem

Posts: 1979

jump backJump back to quoted post7 Sep 2019, 14:30 PMVipper

Does you response has anything to do with the post you have quoted?


yes because conscripts still need buffs but the modteam doesnt buff them because of penals
Reply Reply Multi Quote
Vipper
7 Sep 2019, 14:34 PM
#572
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post7 Sep 2019, 14:30 PMgbem


yes because conscripts still need buffs but the modteam doesnt buff them because of penals

Taking a weapon slot or not is irrelevant, there is little to no reason why the PPsh upgrade does not take a weapon slot.

1) I have repeatedly posted that imo Penal and VGs need a redesign.
2) I have repeatedly posted that imo the buffing of units should be stopped and some units should be nerfed.
3) I can not help you, you need to bring any issues you think exist to MOD and not me.
:)
Reply Reply Multi Quote
distrofio
7 Sep 2019, 15:57 PM
#573
avatar of distrofio

Posts: 2358

jump backJump back to quoted post7 Sep 2019, 14:30 PMgbem


yes because conscripts still need buffs but the modteam doesnt buff them because of penals

Nerf penals then!

I had never got such a simple answer
Reply Reply Multi Quote
thedarkarmadillo
7 Sep 2019, 18:09 PM
#574
avatar of thedarkarmadillo

Posts: 5279

jump backJump back to quoted post7 Sep 2019, 15:57 PMdistrofio

Nerf penals then!

I had never got such a simple answer

The tricky thing about that tho is it would have to coinside with a con buff and judging by how late the 7th man is slated to come out compared to LITERALLY all other weapon upgrades it's pretty clear that cons are not supposed to be a viable unit. You could probably put cons in t3/4 and throw the upgrade in there and there would be no change from them being in T0. Their placement is misleading I think. They are NOT t0 infantry they are supposed to be late game infantry only viable when elite infantry hits the field and not a second before. At least that's what all conscript design directions to date lead me to believe.
#stalinwept
Reply Reply Multi Quote
Stug life
8 Sep 2019, 16:06 PM
#575
avatar of Stug life

Posts: 4474

to fix cons

an orrah buff might just fix cons, give it 20% RA and 30% CD reduction during it, and they become good but not op , it can eb used both for offense and defense
katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
Reply Reply Multi Quote
Widerstreit
8 Sep 2019, 22:35 PM
#576
avatar of Widerstreit

Posts: 1392

jump backJump back to quoted post8 Sep 2019, 16:06 PMStug life
to fix cons

an orrah buff might just fix cons, give it 20% RA and 30% CD reduction during it, and they become good but not op , it can eb used both for offense and defense


Sounds good, that and nerfing penals a little bit.
Reply Reply Multi Quote
thedarkarmadillo
8 Sep 2019, 23:44 PM
#577
avatar of thedarkarmadillo

Posts: 5279

jump backJump back to quoted post8 Sep 2019, 16:06 PMStug life
to fix cons

an orrah buff might just fix cons, give it 20% RA and 30% CD reduction during it, and they become good but not op , it can eb used both for offense and defense

might be a bit much if you combine it with 7 man. im happy to try it (your numbers are much more liberal than i might have put to it) but it may need toning down a bit
#stalinwept
Reply Reply Multi Quote
Mr. Someguy
8 Sep 2019, 23:54 PM
#578
avatar of Mr. Someguy

Posts: 4928

If we're going to stick with the idea that Conscripts are only for support, not combat, then why not improve their cost effectiveness instead of combat effectiveness? Let's try them at 220 Manpower a squad and see how they do. Ironic that Soviets struggle with manpower, but not OKW, the one faction that should be scraping the barrel for Manpower scraps, it's completely inverted.

In order to improve the effectiveness of Merge, we could also reduce their Target Size to 1, and add a Squad Received Accuracy Multiplier of the same amount. This ensures Conscripts are less of a liability when merging, but still more likely to be killed on their own.


I still don't like the idea that they are only for support, what are they even supporting? This concept has just led to Penal meta because Conscripts and Maxims are nonviable. I still stand by the idea that Conscripts should get a stock PPSh upgrade available to them.
jump backJump back to quoted post22 Jan 2016, 01:09 AMluvnest
all you filthy hotchkiss lovers need to l2p #TeamPanzerIII

> Kriegsbeute Doctrine|Partisan Rework|British Infantry Rework|Soviet Assault Squad <
Reply Reply Multi Quote
Mazianni
9 Sep 2019, 00:03 AM
#579
avatar of Mazianni

Posts: 785

jump backJump back to quoted post8 Sep 2019, 23:54 PMMr. Someguy

I still don't like the idea that they are only for support, what are they even supporting? This concept has just led to Penal meta because Conscripts and Maxims are nonviable. I still stand by the idea that Conscripts should get a stock PPSh upgrade available to them.


The idea of them merging with a penal unit is also a bit stupid tbh
Reply Reply Multi Quote
Mr. Someguy
9 Sep 2019, 00:27 AM
#580
avatar of Mr. Someguy

Posts: 4928

jump backJump back to quoted post9 Sep 2019, 00:03 AMMazianni
The idea of them merging with a penal unit is also a bit stupid tbh


I always thought that was hilarious to be honest.

"You will replace those who have met an untimely end."

...15 seconds later

"IF YOU ARE NOT DYING, YOU ARE NOT TRYING!"

jump backJump back to quoted post22 Jan 2016, 01:09 AMluvnest
all you filthy hotchkiss lovers need to l2p #TeamPanzerIII

> Kriegsbeute Doctrine|Partisan Rework|British Infantry Rework|Soviet Assault Squad <
Reply Reply Multi Quote
PAGES (30)down
New topic New topic    
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest
COH2.ORG » Forums » Parlor Room » COH2 Central » COH2 Balance » Soviet September patch discussion

Ladders Top 10

UKF
USF
OKW
SOV
OST
1v1
2v2
3v3
4v4
  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

Top Tier Teams
VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Einhoven Country Honor
Honor it
9
 Download
Download
1222
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

748 users are online: 748 guests
1 post in the last 24h
16 posts in the last week
38 posts in the last month
Registered members: 48927
Welcome our newest member, janafix
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM