Profile of mrgame2

Usf player complaint they don't have a heavy unit. I say compare Pershing and Tiger now. There's your heavy unit.

Tiger may look bigger graphically, but tiny Pershing is a clearly better unit, can we agre here?

Are you sure you're playing the same game?

Yes, why you say that?

Brumbafant sounds fair, and if we use tiger as such, i guess it works. But allies do have good AI heavy

The tiger is probably the most consistent heavy tank. It has stead damage output, good armour and great health. But at the heart its an overgrown p4, use it like one and profit. You still need to support your armour, no matter what the armour is.

Axis stock armour is more durable than allied stock armour and allied doctrinal meat shields are more durable that their axis counterparts. It's not rocket science. The allied players are dedicating their doctrine to having something that can take punishment while the axis factions have that luxury by default.

In your comparison of jackson/ Pershing vs panther/ tiger did you happen to factor in health? Or just offensive stats? What about armour?

I disagree its a p4. I guess here lies in old/misjudged mindset. I would love if it has the same vet bonus p4 gets though.

I stand by my brumba-fant example. Painfully slow turret is not supporting for its level.

Like i said, tigers seen a long period of unused, and it dropped back to under used in last week games and i wonder if this week games we see more tigers again.

Yes i consider everything from range, pen, speed, crew repairs, abilities, vet bonus, target size. It just felt usf combo is clearly better

Hey guys, i just realized remember, tigers weren't use for a long period before the aoe/cp changes. In fact i started trying tiger after watching earlier wc19 games, where it seems fun to micro a tank with AI. But last week games, we see less tigers already.

I guess we all sub consciously knew tiger has a little too much short comings, which imo mine stated here could be of help.

Tiger does both AT-AI really well. I find that it can consistently drop models per shot and due to its higher rof can quickly force squads off. It also has pretty solid dps so it does well in fighting other Heavies. Really the biggest issue for it is TDs. But those units are designed to counter heavy tank play.

Yes of course the 60td has been a gripe since they started. We all in agreement allies are better fighting heavy then the other way round.

Since im been practicing tiger(ace), i realising allies may most probably have the better heavy/callins too. Damning combo.

Tiger gun may work fine in smaller 1v1 but in bigger team games, its super slow tracking, combine with lower pen, is wanting. This is a fresh perspective i give from a lower level player. Its rof also comes in vet2 and it isnt the fastest anyway. There are little supporting evidence to require heavy micro and lack of vet.

I believe its another unit leftover in old wehr is gold mindset.

Even sanders ttk is2 vs tiger example dont take in chance to pen, no? At a low 50-50 chance, is tiger gun that good? If you can't aim, what's use of rof?

If anything, tiger feels closer to a brumba-fant. Better AI than AT. Eaiser to counter than is2.

Something like pershing is even better AI, and has enough similar stats to outperform tiger at AT. It even got a hp buff recently and 'high' tiger hp becomes less good reasoning.

Jackson + Pershing or panther + tiger. Hmm, i say again, allies are better, especially once late game vet bonus applies