Profile of Princeps

The reinforce bunker is too expensive to use. Which is why i always suggested to make base bunkers 50mp and put the other 100mp of the cost on the upgrades. You would keep it equal on the MG, but you could tweak numbers for the medic and reinforce bunker.

1000% This!

Reinforce Bunkers would be usefull if they had a "retreat Flag" option.

I'm a 2vs2 Ostheer player in top 100 and I have some experience with Bunker so may I share with you all?

Reinforce bunker is a joke: Building it close to frontline and will result in Penal / Infantry Section with Arty grenade closing in and destroy it, you will just lost your MP and even squad trying to repair and hold it.

if you somehow managed to preserve the bunker till late game, it still result into a heat position that enemy will always fire arty / rocket => Losing even more MP and squad.

Rather than going Reinforce bunker, you better of getting 251 halftrack:

Show Spoiler

I'm more MAD losing my halftrack in late game than losing my Ostwind because it's a pain in the ass getting that sweet 251 vet 3 again.

Rather than going Reinforce bunker, I think MG bunker are way better investment compare to it.
MG Bunker ( a slight off topic )
Show Spoiler

1000% THIS ! and if u want/need u just can upgrade to Flamethrower halftrack. so 250 is a Must have as OST player.

Or maybe it is because Assgren and Ostruppen are too good early game when associated with the HMG42.

Stuff

Theyre only good in the early game... that thier point. no one rly wants Ostruppen to fight allied late game inf.

The core design of OST as a defensive faction is long gone. U simply diddnt want to lose ground against allies. Everyone plays agressive to make up ground. The COH1 tactics are long burried my friend.

The way I see the last few pages is like this

WTF

What's wrong here is axis players want an allied Big Mac (5 man double upgrade mainline inf) yet still want to keep all the delicious sides the allied players don't have (sniper RoF, MG42, Pgrens).

That's unfair and would break balance.

u mean like inventing more untis for Brits because they want the "burger" or Mortar for each faction?
Or snares?

Its funny that if allies lack something, its like "unplayable".

But when grens struggle against overbuffd allied inf.... "l2P u got all your tools"

Last tournament no one builds grens, everyone searched for ways around it.
But hey its ok.

And all the "delicious sides" allies have, are not there or what?

Infantry section have their RA changed from 0.9 to 0.85 -> LITERALLY UNKILLABLE TERMINATOR HURR DURR REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Double the Gren damage -> reasonable buff.

Wehraboos be wehrabooin, as usual.

sure that was the only change Brits got #allied Fanboys

yes and why not double it and look what happens, like allied buffs were coming in that way.

U can nerf it later.

Brtis got raw battle performance buffs and Grens... here u can save up to 200+ Mp during a entire game that will definitv help u to win battles.

There is a huge difference between tweak level changes like they did and I'll thought out sledgehammer changes like LITERALLY DOUBLE THE DAMAGE OUTPUT. why even stop there? Why not give all members an lmg? I don't k ow why you are being so reserved with your modest suggestion of doubling the damage of a 240mps 60 mu upgrade.

yeay like the "tweak level" changes for brits ... or for the M36 years ago... or all the other funny things.

here is the funny thing about the 240+60+60 variant... in game u can do this just pick up another Mg42 from the ground. And what then? your grens shredd anything the see longerange with no why to keep up with double bar units... oh wait

We are talking about giving the actuel worst core unit lategeme relevance and a compansation for there weakness. And not about making Obers double MG vet 2 untis...

Whats the point on Buffing thier MG42 and let it cost 80 Mun?
Or make them 5 Men for 260MP .

The concept of being a low number, immoblie fireing squat with not great firepower is not rly good?

From my point of view i would pay more for the initaial cost and have better battle performence in the late. Consider that OST has no Uber call in Units for the late .... besides Stormtroopers.

And u mean reserved like 3tripple Elite zooks... or double grab waepons on all inf ? or just invent more units to fill roles the faction never had... or just add mortars because resons.



while OKW "pls gib cashes" NOOOOO!

PS: we all know that no one rly wants double the dmg on any unit from one patch to another.... but somehow people dont understand the point.

Don't get toxic with me. It's pretty clear what I stated previously; swap the calliope and the scott and then nerf the calliope a bit.

Sry, but idk what that should do? scott is 100 Times better than calli.
especially agasint raks. sometimes u get 2shotted.

so pls calliop stock, from my point of view this would be a nerf.

Rak is just too cheap for what you get. 2 raks can be really deadly with their increased range and larger crews, plus the retreat. Yet, they cost only 440mp.

Too cheap for a T0 AT gun... well ok

Price is not a problem, forgiveness for being overextended vs infantry is.

Like every SU weapon Team with its 2000+ people and merch if that is not enough!

the issue is that flanking isn't always possible. You get put on lane maps like red ball and minsk pocket and poltawa and cry in a corner.

oh no maybe than u have to use ure brain to get "around" this strength of your enemy.
USF has the most arty options in game... so pls if ur are not able to deal with the worst Pak in the game pls delete! btw idk want u want? just running wild with USF supreme inf an shred everthing with jacksons..