Nope at all. UC are not 251 to begin with. One is a toy the other a logistic vehicle. 251 are a odd unit subject of many discussions already, cloning it will make the game worse.
T1 UC ruins UKF openings, forcing all but IS spam, wich is already being a problem. It also removes the IS carrying to force a HMG out of place. It denies the only flanking tool in the first 3 minutes.
Want a WASP buff? Its ok to say it so but there are just too many assuptions i do not agree with about making UC T1.
Its easier to unlock volks pfaust from min 0 rather.
The only complaint worth mentioning is the UKF IS spam, UC nerfs were aimed towards making UKF players to choose, IS spam with no UC support, or a balanced opening with no bolster.
Edit: Lago's on point, even reducing starting MP for OKM seems a better idea
if the original "role of vehicle" was never changed or adapted kubel would still be a suppression vehicle and brumbar would not barrage things. That line if argument means very little if you ask me
Sometimes forgotten units need more attention then simple nerfs up or down. Tech swap would adjust that, and if you ask me the reason bolster is so popular is because
A: it's an indirect counter vs sniper
B: it's a fuel sink to give you some AI capability. Much needed vs volk spam (current UC costs no fuel, further pushing players to bolster button)
C: current UC offers very little after min 5 due to low survivability, bolster Tommy is far easier to keep alive and manage
Current UC is rarely used apart from against OKW on open maps. WASP is like a unicorn vs Ost because of faust and MG42 with magic bullets more than enough to keep you off until 222 one minute later.
The current timing of the unit makes no sense with how the meta has changed if you ask me. And with these changes you would see MORE change in meta rather than sitting in T0 with bolster upgrade, now you would have a option to tech and rush a unit