Profile of SuperHansFan

It is unfair to straight up compare Volksgrenadiers to Conscripts or Grenadiers.

OKW has been designed with worse support weapons, so Volksgrenadiers are meant to be able to fight better independently than their counterparts. They are meant to be slightly more cost effective than other infantry.

Conscripts and especially Grenadiers however, are designed to be supplemented by support weapons.

I have been pointing out this is why Tommies shouldn't be nerfed or at least with a nerf buff the stuff UKF are missing (flamer or flame nades, snare on mainline, mortar or normal snipe aim time).

But then all I get in return is a bunch of vacuum stats on how upgraded Tommies fair vs axis infantry or how their grenade is OP vs MG's.

People need to look at faction balance as a whole not just specific things like Jackson or Tommies etc. But it's a common problem on these forums

I would say remove sandbags from all mainlines

Engineers should be the ones having to construct, but make their construction time faster.

cause people rushed them, now they can't rush with both cp and tech but they will come later cause u can't stall anymore with lower tech and have to build up

If there is a command point requirement it will still be lower than the current 13 or 14 for tiger or isu etc in unchanged doctrines. The TA uptick changes were a kneejerk nerf as the game was a mess with 14min tigers and allied heavies still being command point bound, but still it comes earlier than 15 command points.

So yes they will be coming earlier, this is basic understanding the concept of time. Especially in 2vs2 and up where caches and pocket fuels are commonplace.

> Be gbem
> Compare a 0 fuel mortar to a 100 fuel unit
> Cant comprehend how fuel cost and timings should affect unit strength.

Precision shot was more of an issue on lategame howitzers

It's totally comparible

Personally I would like the stuka changed to incendiary rockets like old vcoh webelewerfer, buff the damage vs emplacements but give support weapons a chance to move before being instawiped

There's also the point that making brens and five man a "must pick" ability limits strategic choice.

Right now if I want to ignore five man and go for a Vickers with four man Tommies to hold off until I go for a commando centric strat I could do that.

But if core Tommy performance is nerfed would these sort of strats still be viable vs a horde of volk spam? Especially stuff like healing changes with having to baby my mg teams back to rear lines with awkward healing restrictions. If tommy healing is that OP just remove it and mirror Brit static healing at the Forward assembly cost with the Otheer bunker. No need for such a complicated and clumsy healing ability that will put off new players.

I think you're making the meta even more dependant and limited on Tommy spam if anything.

No Brit player or allied fanboy ITT would care if Tommies got a heavy nerf and other parts of the faction buffed to Ostheer levels.

The problem is there's no attention to forgotten or neglected parts of the faction after these vacuum tests vs volks and kneejerk nerfs. Pretty sure that's why the old testmod changes got binned, that and relic being stubborn about keeping emplacements.