Profile of SuperHansFan

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 833

General Information


Thread: Maxim Sustained Fire12 Dec 2019, 10:33 AM Somewhere out there a wild vonivan is dreaming of what could be with a sudden Maxim buff In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The recent Infantry Sections nerf12 Dec 2019, 10:27 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2019, 08:39 AMStug life But how ? Total tech cost is actually 5 higher for axis And for getting to certain unit with side tech is the same or very similar example : Okw to get LT needs 70 fuel , ukf to get to aec + weapon upgrade and nade (so same stuff) needs only 70 fuel , for tank again it's similar (osther is the same as it's 70 for LV ) Okw to get to tanks needs at minimum 200 fuel with healing , USF to get to tank with upgrades and healing it's 215 fuel while getting LV and smoke For LV again it's similar Btw blvk literally said that ukf needs to spend resources to get upgrades while okw and oat just pay munition, so no most people did say thing close to it considering they followed that band wagon until I responded Do u maybe mean the weapon are worse for the allies ? 2 Stg have as shown before worse DPS than bar and occupy 2 slots Lmg 42 is a bit better than bren but it cost 25% more Lmg 34 cost as much as 2 elite bren but with much worse DPS Sherck are better that's true but they either come with expensive squads or are overpriced on Sturm and all the unit that have them can't use snare unlike rifle or RE with Zook/piat So where do u put more resources to get equal performance ? It's more u get better performance for equal or more price depending on the unit or upgrade I don't know why the hell you are deflecting obvious issues with UKF contrasted with Ost or OKW by bringing up BARS or USF here Nobody is arguing BARS or rifleman upgrades or tech is overpriced. In fact if Brits had BARS or StG profile weapons instead of lackluster brens and cover gimmicks a lot of their issues with underpowered IS would be gone overnight. Stay on topic or you're just digging your irrelevant argument into a deeper hole. It's already deep enough which is why so you have so many replies saying you're wrong. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The recent Infantry Sections nerf10 Dec 2019, 15:05 PM I witnessed the most depressing example of how terrible IS are dragging the faction down today Tightrope as UKF vs some no name 100 or so Chinese players OKW. Tightrope made some great plays with his AEC taking out luch and even a P4 but it basically just meant nothing because the OKW player could frontally charge squads into British infantry and walk all over them winning every engagement with brainless micro. Tightrope tried going for extra sappers for extra CQB punch and snares for the sniper but they were just vet pinatas for StG volks So the result was basically no map control as his sniper and MG was zoned out and swarmed by multiple (superior) infantry squads. If top players getting rolled over like this by noobs and the likes of Hans saying Brits are unplayable then I'm not sure what warrants some serious buffs to infantry options or at least a rollback of the changes that have broken a faction in 1vs1. The initial changes didn't work, and the 10mp decrease and vet change accomplished nothing. Something else needs to budge or Brits are basically limbless at this point In: COH2 Balance
Thread: State of the Soviets6 Dec 2019, 16:44 PM Cons are not the problem, they easily get out traded by the pfuzz meta as last tourny showed. Even late game and 7man they struggle vs vet pfuzz and obers Where OKW players struggled was when T70 started doing damage, the unit is broken and no FHT or quad does not even come close to the wipe potential. It's just a no brainer unit and was rushed every single game. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: State of the Soviets5 Dec 2019, 05:31 AM Soviets should not have such a powerspike with the t70 and the last tournament showed this. Soviets can lose an m3, lose squads, but the moment the T70 hits the game can completely fall into their favor as you risk your sturms or capping units being wiped if you even DARE sidecap the map. The closest you can get to the T70s wipepower in situations like this is ost 444. But multiple vehicles are a lot harder to keep alive than one t70 tied to a hotkey zooming around the map. Vet 3 gives it a wipe autocanon AND great recon late game. The vet 3 really is borderline broken compared to other lvs Nerf it and buff Maxim In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The UKF solution5 Dec 2019, 05:07 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Dec 2019, 13:14 PMThe Spycrab Any suggestions as from experience their unit roster feels at times underwhelming? One infantry unit and one engineer, both which are rather lackluster and on certain maps you just get bullied vs axis infantry in cqb. It doesn't help brens are basically a downgrade in cqb DPS (point blank they do less than rifles, and two lmg models spinning around to target has an extra effect on that too) yet you need them to trade at medium or long range vs axis inf. Yet vanilla riflemen can hold their own vs sturms and charging stg volks and even recently got a buff to help in these exact engagements. Meanwhile Brits have two perfectly good units with unique character models and unique voice lines (airlanding officer and commandos) locked away in doctrines. Reworking sections, five man and creating a new unit non doc (using existing Air landing or commando assets) that fills the pgren role would give the faction some much needed flavor. And you could make the faction something different then buffing sections into rifleman clones In: COH2 Balance
Thread: UKF absent from tourney play again22 Nov 2019, 09:12 AM Obviously when it comes to top level play when even seasoned ukf players are picking soviets or USF instead this is an indicator to where UKF balance is currently. Tommie 10mp decrease or not let's face it their in a pretty dire place right now. A couple of token 3-0 stomp fests in the early rounds aside. But lurking the forums it seems like there's not much discussion to WHY Brits are weak at current time. Some would blame it on sub par infantry options, lack of mortar or real heavy tank in a heavy tank meta. This thread is intended to shine a spotlight on just what the issue is so the balance team can get a better idea of gripes from players and overview to the problems that exist. Hopefully a few top players can throw their hat in the ring and explain why they avoided UKF in competitive play In: COH2 Balance
Thread: About IS20 Nov 2019, 11:21 AM Brits need an extra infantry unit and a mortar in their roster and they would finally be perfectly balanced. Some kind of ober like unit but having to tech brens To keep it relevant Jump back to quoted post19 Nov 2019, 21:57 PMT.R. Stormjäger No dude, Sections don’t have to be better because Pgrens are stock. By the time Pgrens hit the field Sections are 5 men with a Bren and grenades. Any actual points besides the “muh UP sections”? Fully upgraded Tommies by the time a pgrens are built? I'll have some of what you've been smoking If you said obers you would have a factually correct sentence there In: COH2 Balance
Thread: My Proposal to change Allied TDs4 Nov 2019, 09:02 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2019, 17:57 PMLago He's right in that a Vet 3 Sherman 76 with level 3 Radio Net and Combined Arms has an absolutely mental rate of fire. But it's so difficult to assemble that combo that I'm not really worried by it. Yet what you just posted is flat out wrong Combined arms does not stack on top of veterency In: COH2 Balance
Thread: My Proposal to change Allied TDs3 Nov 2019, 11:34 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2019, 10:19 AMVipper The analysis is simply flawed Both units have a armor value which is similar Churchill with less HP There 4 commander with Tiger and 2 with Ace out of 22 commander, do the math Soviet have 2 commanders with IS-2 2 commander with KV-2, 2 commander with T-34/85, 3commander with KV-1. UKF have 3 commander with Croc and 1 with AVRE USF have 1 Pershing, 1 Easy8, 1 Dozer, 2 with dozer upgrade 2 soviet commanders with ISU-152 The M1 with Sabot has higher penetration than the Pak, better ROF, wider angle. More specifically about the Jackson Stock sherman is one of the most cost efficient medium tank that can also be upgrade with dozer in to doctrines bringing close to OKW PZIV levels. Pak and Zis is also behind a specific tier and they do not provide a "free squad", M1 is the cheapest stock ATG, M1 has 72% chance to penetrate the Ostheer PzIV at range 60-70. 4 commander have access to super bazookas and some of the best AT infatry Not really, Easy8, Sherman dozer upgrade, Sherman 76mm, M10 can fight PzIV Persning can fight everything. I&R pathfinder barrage is devastating to slow moving Tanks Panther is a more expensive TD so of coarse the Ez8 "unreliable", try facing 2 Easy8 with Panther The same. 76mm Sherman is dirty cheap and its vet bonuses are simply OP, Try a vet 3 76mm with radio net bonus and see. You keep bringing up doctrinal USF tanks vet 3... Maybe you should take a look at how vet 5 P4s absolutely ruin infantry and hey why we are looking at this vacuum why not elite armor HEAT shells where it clubs 76mm Shermans too and drops arty on AT guns too. If 76s rolled out at vet 3 and were non doc like a P4 you would have a point, but they don't. If you're gonna make a comparison to something like OKW P4 you could at least compare it with the doctrinal goodies it gets. Then there's the issue USF tanks are a lot harder to keep alive on average compared to axis armor to reach those vet levels. In: COH2 Balance