Profile of Mr Carmine

Immobilize is still in the game. It requires specific mines or temporary in case of AEC. I can't remember now heavy engine dmg and engine destroyed is basically the same as thread breaker (immobilization).

Flame crits i supposed you refer to flamethrower crits. I would like if the explosion was bigger since it now only applies when the last model dies and the dmg is low (would just punish blobbing)

There are plenty of crew shock/stuns.

Yeah afaik the obly the riegel mines can do that. It used to be rng with all mines i believe. I dont know of any other mine that can do that atm.

I speficly meant the mollie flame crits. When is was actualy a big threat, and not just a disloding tool, a not very good one at that.

Soviet and other mines being capped at 2 models, for the aake of ost.

And all the crew shock and stun are tied to vet abilities, i meant bouncing is2 isu tagdtiger kv2 rounds cuasing stun on bouncing.

No, the Maxim definitely should not be buffed. Everything has to be done to prevent Maxim spam from becoming a thing again. It's already pretty commonly used in 3v3/4v4 and is a strong strategy despite the individually poor performance of the Maxim. There are way too many lane maps like Whiteball Express, Redball Express etc. that just make it WAY too easy to lock down the entire map with MGs.

So because its used with effect it is bad somehow? People please stop with the mds. All factors from the spam period have been nerfed hard. Now it will become usable for muni cost per use. It doesnt deserve the same mp price as the mg42.

So do we nerf the mg42/43 instead? They lock down an area even better for the same or less mp and less muni.

I didn't say they weren't. I am saying abandons are bad, not RNG in general...


That is literally not true. Whether or not you provide vision for your barrage makes a HUGE difference. The scatter also changes depending on range, so where you fire from/place the arty piece is also very important


The amount of AT sources has nothing to do with whether or not a tank gets abandoned. It can be a 1 on 1 fight or a massive brawl, that's completely irrelevant


You clearly said greedy players deserve that outcome of giving a tank away. I'm saying losing a tank is more than enough punishment


And this is why I'm "foaming". This point is completely invalid and really fucking annoying. As I have already said I love the RNG of coh. The entire game runs on RNG. I am talking about one specific example of it

Telling me to go play a completely different style of RTS when I am talking about one specific mechanic is ridiculous

Yeah sorry i am the one going way overboard here, again my apologies. It wont happen again.

Ml20 off maps etc do indeed benefit from vision, i am not deneying that. it decreases the massive chance they hit nothing.

Amount of at increases the chance to get mgc or abandon, same with low pen and high rof or more units increase chance to pen afaik. The turn around woudnt have been so great if he didn,t push so hard with 1 tank vs 2 meds and 2 atg's into the enemy base.

What i said was het got punished for over extending his single tank vs 4 at sources. Even without the mgc and abandon he would loose the p4 regardless. The soviet player deserved that kill. That it all that happend in the enemy base was made possible by the ost player, if he had p tact or vet 1 blits he would have a good chance to save the p4.

What i do find over the top is that the mgc p4 got abandond as well within seconds of getting mgc. I am all for needing conditions or bigger theshholds to limit such rng, but never outside tournaments remove them outright.

To me such games are more fun and exciting to watch and play then massive rng clean tournament games. Those are mostly decided in the first few minutes, this is why i cant enjoy sc2 streams once behind you dont have a real chance off coming back, its just delaying the inevatable.

Again my apologies for before, you dont deserve my "foaming" rants.

You can ask the MOD, but I would suspect because the Panzershcrek VG blob syndrome.

VG with shcreck had average AI, original PTRs conscripts had average AI but once they manage to reach a critical mass these blob had enough AI/AT to deal with most things.

The design where spamming a single unit is a viable strategy is simply bad for the game.

Spam being viable is bad i agree. Thats why i like whiteflashes idea that all mines should suppress inf, including the entire blob besides killing 2 models.

Though not cheap in the slightest you will need a lot more cons then you would need rifles pfussies pgrens to deal with the same amount of things.
It would also be great if the loose ai for at upgrade was apllied evenly across faction, buts its almost always soviets cant have x cuz reasons.

Main gun criticals and abandons are not fun RNG. Attack ground is fun. Howitzer scatter is fun

A 5% chance for your tank to be given to the enemy only punishes people for being daring. That's not fun, that's idiotic and it encourages boring strategy. It doesnt add something to the game, it removes something

It not being fun or fun rng is a opinion nothing more nothing less.
Howitzer rng is massive rng as well as most off maps, so your contradicting yourself.

It makes people more cautios when they otherwise would be daring. Is not taking away from the game. 1+1-1=1

That 5% keeps me in my seat where i would otherwise tune out because its already decided. I saw a game yesterday where a p4 got mgc and abandoned in the enemy base. The ost player over extended greatly took a big risk and got punished for it. He did play greatly up until that point. I loved that game.